Member Info for BobsSocks

Https://app.superbio.ai/copilot

Turns out it is a wrapper for,

https://copilot.microsoft.com

AKA ChatGPT

Unfortunately it has become unresponsive so I guess you lot have run it out of free credits.

"Firstly it is not Mr Nag it is Professor Nag and a highly elite Professor at that. Even if you have a lack of respect man at least respect the esteemed position he holds."

Thanks. I can assure you that I have experience of Academia. To me he is Mr Nag or Rocket RonJon.and asking you as investors in CPAI to throw his version of someone else's Spaghetti at the wall in the hope that something sticks.

With a pitch like this...

"Scientists and researchers can submit models and tools directly to superbio.ai. We will compensate researchers fairly as well. If you contribute to the community with a model or tool that’s widely used, Superbio.ai will generate passive income for you!"

I doubt the man has much to offer but rather relies on others coming up with the bright ideas that he made his reputation on previously.

Https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/08/08/openai-announces-gpt-5-please-microsoft-dont-kill-us/

Notice how Mr Gerard explains the numbers and graphs to you. Obviously he is trying to get in lower because he does not know the proper flim flam words. Well actually he does.

Anyway there you go. Open AI supposedly with cash on fire hose appears to have hit a dead end, apparently along with the rest of them, and yet Mr Nag can rock up with investors in CPAI taking the place of Softbank and Microsoft to boost a few giveaways to Agentic Status.

Lucky little CPAI and you.

My question remains.

Why does R42, apparently a high powered investment company, need your pennies for Nag to pretend to be an Accelrationist?

"See you all bright and early for some more entertainment if nothing else."

Excellent to see you here rallying the troops.

Presumably when we get the next upturn the commander will put in a personal appearance but it is good to know that we have not been forgotten and might hope for an exit point at a later date.

Others would do well to follow our angel as they spread the message elsewhere where faith is also wavering and new recruits are ripe to be picked.

We have not been forgotten.

Beg pardon. Patch.

"The ignorance of your comment is extraordinary."

Sorry about that one. I have no personal experience of Amway but it is good to see RocketRon has seen fit to grant us a Franchise.

"Or perhaps you're a trader....."

No worries. Your pitch is safe.

"The fact Ron is looking into niche markets for CPAI in a already huge AI wave in the next 5 years, gives me great confidence in holding."

Good spot. I also think that investors in CPAI should feel blessed that the management hooked up with RocketRon and he was generous enough to send some of his best projects their way. 🚀🚀🚀

I am reminded of the lecture given by no less than Richard Feynman where he commented on seeing a particular car number plate and was quite amazed at its uniqueness.

I certainly believe that we are seeing the same here.

America and no doubt Silicon Valley must be full of property development companies just gagging to get into AI and yet RocketRon chose us. We are truly blessed.

"Call it a pump all you like, but £200 million valuation is actually a possible scenario on revenues of £20 million per annum with a revenue mutiple of 10x, which is on the lower end of the standard revenue multiples for AI applications, where it can often go all the way up to 20 - 40x or more.

Therefore, the above valuation would require around 43k people to subscribe to Author42 out of a possible 10 million or 0.43% of the potential user base. And this is not including sub-licensing agreements."

Oh dear. I had just settled down for a nice kip in my woodwork.

43K subscribers for a revenue of £20 Million per annum so that's £465 per subscriber.. Hang on... is that Gross or Net? Let's say you net 30%. Now your up to £1,500 per subscriber. ISTR you giving some tier model where people could get a taste of the goodness for just £19.

Now everyone is paying £1,500. What happened there?

Perhaps you need to go back and pluck some different revenue numbers out of the air before you you pluck pluck some revenue multiplier numbers out of the same air. Do try to make sure there is any sense to them.

"So true Fyoz, he clearly cannot understand the basic concept surrounding CapAI's business strategy.

Why should shareholders be diluted by £2 million? Well Bobssocks, back to basic maths, as a shareholder, if one of the projects gains traction and becomes successful with a potential valuation in the 10s or 100s of millions, then as I stated before, given the current agreement for each project this value will effectively transfer over to CapAI. So, if say Author42 gains a valuation of £200 million, CapAI's market cap will quickly follow suit, and if CapAI'a market cap is close to £200 million also, then buying the whole IP for £2 million shares would be 1% dilution. "

Thanks for the big number lesson. Things always look much better when you use big numbers. 1% of £2 for a lottery ticket is 20p but 100% of a winning lottery ticket is all of the winnings for that ticket. Happy days if you hit a triple rollover. I have to admit I am not very good at analogies.

Just one question if I may?

Why would R42 clone an AI model for CapAI that turns out to be worth £200 Million then shrug and take £2 Million, as share dilution for CapAI investors, in return? I realize I might be missing some sort of profit share.

However whilst you have stated that Ronjon is some sort of Silicon Valley Mega-Guru whilst I am just a low level day trader you also seem to be saying he is some sort of thicko who cannot spot something worth £200 Million.

Without resorting to number sophistry how does that one work?

"Just proves you lack the ability to understand basic fundamentals of how AI & coding works."

I guess they just load up the transform with as much information as they can or according to their budget, perhaps selectively, and then tag some guardrails on top of it or the ready made one you borrowed from someone else such as only answer questions specific to the biological sciences and definitely not about high energy physics..

As long as no-one feeds the troll here is one last add.

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/CPAI/strategic-alliance-with-r42-3rqxxlr2yzfelbq.html

"Projects Under Review"

Read the list for yourselves. Given Super Bio is a general purpose Science LLM and some of those projects are Science Based with the others being Creativity based I would be inclined to suggest that this is an example of "Same Dogfood. Different Packaging"

As such I have no idea why CapAI or rather their investors should be diluted to the tune of £2 Million for each one.

Sorry. I thought I had died but someone resurrected me....

"So if CapAI decides to buy all successful IP's at £2 million each, that would mean R42 gets £6 million in shares in CapAI. "

So. Not real money then. Just CapAI shareholders getting diluted. That seems to be a common theme amongst these AI Plays.

Of course it is real money once R42 sells the shares back to the PI mugs. They just have to be convinced that the metric for success has any validity. For the moment such metrics do not appear to be in place or at least not well defined but given the quality of posts of some both here and elsewhere it should be an easy drive by.

Still. I suppose for some reason it is a legitimate business model in the sense of wealth transferal.

Harpies and Sirens.

Oh thanks for the link to Ronjons SuperBoi AI. In case he had not realized it also does high energy physics providing similar answers to those offered by Grok 3).

"Do you just do biology or can you do high energy physics?

I can assist with a wide range of scientific domains, including both biology and high energy physics. While my primary focus is on scientific queries, I am equipped to provide information, context, and literature support for topics in high energy physics as well as other scientific fields, provided relevant resources or documents are available. If you have a specific question in high energy physics, feel free to ask!."

Which kind of gives me the impression that Ronjon has just packaged a general purpose science based off the shelf LLM as being the answer to protein folding but forgot to tell it not to give the game away. On the other hand with such clever marketing Ronjon can pretend his stuff has value to life sciences over and above what he actually has. It appears to be working.

Hmmm. If I try to prod it in different directions then it gets a bit stroppy. I can however see some validity to the effort. Whilst Grok manages similarly convincing answers no doubt its model costs more to train and run than something more focused. I guess that's a win but the idea is not exactly ground breaking in the sense that no one would have thought of that one.

Perhaps he used Author42 to come up with the idea for him. "Use a generic science LLM but market it as having a specific focus. SuperBio, SuperPhysics, SuperChemistry. Very clever.

In parting I would suggest that people take a closer look at the relationship between R42 and CapPAI.

R42 is supposedly an investment company and yet they have not invested in CapAI. They are asking shareholders in CapAI to invest in what appear to be pet projects developed or selected by Ronjon. This is Brewsters Millions level stuff. It seems R42, or Ronjon himself, have touted for shiny AI entrepreneur wet behind the ears dreamers to float their ideas to R42 but rather than investing themselves they have chosen to farm out some of the plums to CapAI.

It's another one of those "Why are you selling your dollar printing machines for a dollar rather than printing them yourselves." scenarios but written as "Why are you farming out these new super whizz AI tech Slam Dunk Winners to some nothing company in the UK when you could invest in and develop them yourselves and keep all of the profits?" Maybe CapAI is just getting first dibs on the rejects.

Just a thought.

There you go folk. Your green box count will now go down :)

"Yet you yourself do not provide any actual evidence"

Good point. Perhaps I am being lazy. Speaking of which,

https://market.us/report/ai-in-publishing-market/

You quote the headline CAGR of 30%. That seems a bit lazy for a numbers guy. Perhaps you can give us a breakdown specifically related to "Content Creation" because I can well imagine that, other than the numbers not being there unless you blow the cash, certain sectors will be above that headline figure whilst others will be below. If Cloud is 50% of the breakdown and doing a CAGR of 50% there is not much left elsewhere.

Fine. I'm not giving hard numbers, I can't afford $6,000, but I'm not trying to imply that numbers mean more than really do in order to make a hollow point. Again this is just the "Oooooh look. A big market. If we get 1% of it we will be $Millionares. Wow! 2% and we will be Double $Millionaires..." all of which ignores how that share will be captured and from what level you are starting at.

How about a bit of Pie in the Oven rather than Pie in the Sky?

"Whilst companies exist within the niche sector Author42 is targeting, you are acting like it's a highly over saturated market when it isn't, there is still significant scope for market capture in the AI author/writing sector which has a 30% CAGR showing there is room for growth capture in this targeting niche."

The market is already established. It would be nice to see data that suggests that it is not saturated but without that all you can look at is the dynamics of other companies which indicates that competition is in place against what is already there. That sounds like something that is close to saturation and once again R42 is a new small player with an unknown product.

"Grammarly is not a co author story teller, like Author42, it's just a glorified spell/syntax checker."

Great. If it is so good why is someone from R42 not already on the top seller lists? RonJon comes across as someone who has a flair for creativity. Have R42 published any examples of the type of output their tool produces or are they shy about doing so given the level of fail that has resulted from other company's efforts...

R42 supposedly has a film making AI in the pipeline along with a whole load of other sound alike creativity tools. Perm words from list, Game/Book/Film/Comic/Play/Concerto, to make up new AI thing. Here is Part 4 of Google Failing....

https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/07/19/google-veo-fails-week-4-the-final-faildown/

"If you had bothered to read, it is thought that around 45% of current authors/writers are using some form of AI to help or supplement their writing in some way."

OK. Got that. Anything else you would like to highlight?

https://www.authormedia.com/do-45-of-authors-already-use-ai-author-update/

https://www.author42.com/

As an aside perhaps they should have a look at their server configuration...

https://author42.com/

Your Authormedia link gives use cases that appear to compare to those offered by R42. One tool covering such use cases is Grammarly. Perhaps it would be better to look at what the competition is doing...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammarly

Which should make for a more exciting value narrative for those dreaming about future wealth that might come their way by investing in R42/CPAI. The problem with that one is that R42 is a new kid on the block whereas Grammarly is already established with a large userbase that will prove difficult for R42 to capture. However you might like to drool over its 2022 valuation of $13 Billion but that is based on investment. Does R42 have backers with such deep pockets or are they stuck with CPAI for funding, that's you that is.

Also,

https://getlatka.com/blog/grammarly-revenue/

Their own revenue growth is slowing as a result of competition. ChatGPT is specifically mentioned. Again in as much as Grammerly is already established others are eating their lunch whilst R42 does not at the moment have a seat at the table. Those thinking about jam tomorrow might have to revise their timescales or even wonder whether it will ever arrive.

"Below is a comprehensive analysis of the potential gross revenues Author42 could generate for CapAI, based on capturing 0.1%, 1%, and 10% of global authors, including professional, self-published, and aspiring authors, with monthly subscription pricing ($19, $49, $99, $199)."

Sorry but this is just your typical "If I buy a lottery ticket..." type analysis. It goes hand in hand with companies making statements about Total Addressable Markets being worth $Trillions. There is nothing substantive that indicates that any of the market might be captured. Just numbers plucked from nowhere.

I've had a quick scan but other than estimates based on number of active authors the big missing detail is how many of them are actively using AI to support their work and beyond that how much of their income or addition to it can be attributed to the use of AI. Without such numbers or a comparison with a company already operating in the same area your analysis is worthless.

"It is unknown if Author42's beta will come with a subscription request to access, if so, then Revenues to CapAI will likely follow immediately after it's beta goes live, which is likely only a couple to a few weeks away, if not possibly less."

Excellent. Thanks for shortening the timescale to Proof of Concept. 1 Month it is. Looking forward to Barnes and Noble signing up their first AI enhanced Author with a contract for a sting of Trilogies and it hitting the top sellers list.

"Think the windows shorter than 12 months. Isn't it 8 months to see if they can get todays RNS'd product to work and 4 months min for yesterdays news."

Missed that.

It is nice to see R42 admit to an earliest fail by date... Why invest now when you can wait until the "31 December 2025" to see if they can not only deliver what they claim is on the tin but also their definition of what represents a commercial product. Perhaps wait a bit longer to see if it can actually be commercialized.

Just saying. After all I get the impression that some may have bought into the hype and are presently nursing losses. Do try not to get caught again.

"Don't forget my pants."

Also some getting a life advice and helpline numbers would be nice. I think we have done agenda but, apologies if I missed it, there is still the trying to get in lower one.