Chris Heminway, Exec-Chair at Time To ACT, explains why now is the right time for the Group to IPO. Watch the video here.
Https://boingboing.net/2024/03/11/community-attempts-to-use-sand-to-stop-the-ocean-and-fails.html
Of course. Our Community would not be so silly.
"Oh, Ive got no idea either, green box after excited green box no doubt. nevermind"
That's a bit of a shame. I was relying on people mentioning them in order to check what was happening.
Then again from what I have seen to date it does not look like the messaging has changed.
"Highest ..... Up Volume in a year today."
Good stuff Ay? Last year they has to release a whoops RNS having blown the gaff on Twitter,
https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/images/QBT_-_Market_Update_20_October_23_1.pdf
That was followed by a Placing,
https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/images/QBT_-_Placing_30_Oct_23_final_-.pdf
and the Volume went totes ballistic.
It looks like this year they will get to release an RNS having engineered the gaff via LSE, again self inflicted, and we'll watch History unfold. Fingers crossed it does not repeat because if it does there will be burned ones.
"Perhaps GSA got wind of it being positive and thought it best to close their short."
My theory would be that they were trying out a newb and let them have a play. Someone more senior has stepped in and shut down the risk. Not that they know anything more than anyone else does. Just being sensibly risk averse. I would have gone mad and shorted it harder but I guess things don't work like that if it is not your money.
Well Done all. Don't forget to larf at me. :-) However I'd take a guess that that +50% rise is going to prompt a question about what caused it from the authorities. If so then they may have to release either a "No Idea Guv" or a "Well It's Like This Guv" tomorrow.
Https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Case/PublicationNumber/GB2611321
https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Case/PublicationNumber/GB2611321/Documents
https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP22793447&lng=en&tab=main
https://register.epo.org/application?number=EP22793447&lng=en&tab=doclist
DYOR ETC
It seems some people have a problem with messaging. Why try to get the good news across under such a childish title? Presumably the message isn't worth much or has no real substance.
OK. So it's only day one. But having created the rumour of an RNS, whatever the source, the longer it does not come the more this is likely to drift down. That would be a bit ironic. Those apparently trying to talk the price down to buy in lower get their lower price as a result of those who started the rumour. Of course any such action might be moderated as a result of the no show.
If and when the RNS drops it will be a fudge saying something along the lines that the Lab modelling achieved similar results when testing with a Miner. They will give no details of the nature of that testing but they will go on to claim that they have identified limitations in the method when asked to scale to the present network difficulty. The solution will be implementation of a more sophisticated AI model which will require building and testing and that will take more time and involve more cost. In other words a fund raise.
They will not tell you why it did not scale but, ignoring the fact that they are likely to have been dealing with false positives the underlying reason may well be because as the difficulty increases then so does the search space. As a result an AI model developed at lower difficulties will no longer match to that space and need both scaling and retraining.
Of course if any of the above made any sense or even turns out to be close to being true then that should beg the next question. If the model fell over when it had to cope with a higher difficulty how are you guaranteed that a new model trained for any particular difficulty will not fall over when the difficulty changes again. Are they going to be continuously chasing the end of the rainbow?