Member Info for BobsSocks

"Where does this say news next week then?"

Will was paraphrasing.

Words were working on an update with the hope it would be seen next week.

"Bob. You like shorts. Try mdai. I’ve been suffering there."

AFAIK Bob spends a bit of time on clothing purchases. After all he did pick us. Perhaps you should use a tape measure and buy the right size rather than taking a guess and chafing your tackle.

"We hope it’s chips…"

As I understand things chips are kind of on the back burner at the moment. Assuming there is any the recent focus has been on the AI efforts.

"Wow. No chips?"

Possibly a bit early. We had spudz in 1586 and Oliver Twist was written in about 1838. Apparently the first printed mention of chips in the UK was in 1856 which is 18 years later. Also we had to wait until the Bronze Age in the 1950's before crinkle cuts came along.

Ooops. Beg pardon. KK just did a NoBox(1) and garnished recent events with a load of rubbish. I made up that last bit.

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly7PONiKGUs

"With all due respect Bob, the evening before last you were talking about licking armpits, your balls, having kips and drinking gravy. LOL"

With no due respect because non is due given it was late you were probably tanked and likely missed that the post was referring to actions performed by my Cat.

Has NoBox(1) been trying to teach you how to quote people out of context? He does seem to be doing a good job given your uncanny ability to be just as rubbish at it as he is.

As an aside. When you are not playing out your fantasies here do you wander up to strangers in shops and accuse them of being someone else?

"FFS, you people are mad and very sneaky - the email you've uploaded is fake. Nice try though 🤦🏻. Enjoy yr Sausage, Chips and gravy you nutter."

As a service to others I have just applied a paint stirrer to my brain and can now translate this for you.

Forgetting the fact that it was me that pointed out the disparity in the signatures and the usual torturous efforts to attribute writing style...

KK is now saying that it was me that faked the email and it was me that set up the AHS X account. Then it was me that uploaded the fake email to the AHS X account.

It amazes me how the World manages to function with people such as this within its framework. The level of constructed nonsense they need to support their World View must be close to disrupting the whole fabric of society as we know it.

It is now advising others to listen to themselves.

"Does this Poster have a Life ?"

Looking at the hour apparently not. I was going for Cumberland Sausage and Chips Wiv Gravy a couple of hours ago but I got distracted.

You appear to be upset at my interpretation of the companies messaging however I can assure you that even if I were to be invested I would still have given the same 'constructive' advice.

Please enjoy your crayons. If I remember my childhood they taste better with a mud and orange squash dip.

Request to Mods.

I see you have not removed the post from NoBox(3), ThePain, PhilDePain, claiming that I called him a Paedophile.

NoBox(3), possibly the previous incarnation, says they have copies of those posts and has previously threatened legal action against myself on the basis of their content.

My accusation was that, in accordance with my own experience, the nature of questioning and general manner used by NoBox(3) is similar to the methods that would be used by a Paedophile.

Should NoBox(3) wish to pursue legal action against myself then I am quite happy for you to release my details to his legal representative along with a record of the relevant posts. I shall request the same and a wider search for myself.

Thank You.

Https://twitter.com/JamBoneKoolPain/status/1766034340884959452

Yo Mods. It's out there. Why bother deleting it?

https://imgur.com/0aFuCaG

Let's assume that this and all of the others that have been blarted are 'legitimate' and originated from the same person.

The messaging does not link up and, according to Brew, the person delivering that messaging face planted themselves on technical questioning.

I really get the impression that this person does not speak with any technical knowledge of the company and, assuming the PR department that they are apparently part of were responsible for the, cancelled, videos because simpleton investors were asking too many questions and they were meant for prospective clients needs bypassing.

They should never have been in the loop in the first place.

I seriously hope that FG pulls his socks up, they might be kindred spirits, and, assuming he does have something to report, loses the crayon pushers advice about telling stuff to people with car analogies and goes full on tech hardcore.

After all even the dregs, some of you do not qualify, on this forum appear to have a level of understanding that is closer to Alice and Bob rather than Jack and Jill.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_and_Bob

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_and_Jill

Now whilst I do not presently believe the man I am literally begging him to cast off the chains of the crayon people, including those that eat them on this forum and elsewhere, and take the opportunity to shine in this next RNS with his precision propelling pencil.

Sounds like you're having a Clive Dunning Kruger moment.

The Sleeper Awakens

It looks like NoBox(1) has woken up one of their old accounts over on ADVFN and is now claiming to have received the one true email.

Don't bother denying it.

You spend at least 30% of your time on here accusing others of doing the same. Another 20% asking stupid questions then refusing to accept the answers. 10% of which say things are made up with the majority of that 50% involving conspiracy theories and insults.

40% of the rest of it are carefully crafted misrepresentations of what the company has said. All of them deliberately posted without links to supporting evidence such that for the 5% that actually contain a modicum of truth that someone else has to dig out for you results in demands for apologies.

Your remaining 10% consists of massaging your own ego or that of your mates by agreeing with them that everyone else is in some way defective and, assuming I have my sums correct, the remaining 0% comprises actual meaningful content.

BTW you are literally the reason why this Planet is running out of Emojis whilst Emoji counseling clinics are overloaded with PSTD cases where innocent Emojis have found themselves next to your Drivel.

Note to NoBox(3) No-one wants to engage with you despite your insistence that they do because,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYYo49R_ZS0

HTH EO&E DYOR GLA

I reckon they will have to pull out all of the stops for this RNS and even it they do then if there is no underlying substance they will not recover.

Obviously the measure of that will be how the market reacts. After all nothing that is said here has any influence.

Having said that we shall probably have a good indication of the prospects from the resident soothsayer in terms of which words have to be moved, removed or added to the RNS along with how much padding has to be done with misquoted or misunderstood events from the past.

Rumbles abound that ARGO could be a lost cause.

"The share rose to 3.6p on nothing."

It didn't though. As NoBox(1) has repeatedly told you it rose in line with BTC only it didn't do that either.

It rose because they 'accidentally' blarted out the SaaS solution on Twitter(X) and were forced to publish an RNS the next day.

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/images/QBT_-_Market_Update_20_October_23_1.pdf

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChart.html?sharechart=QBT&share=Quantum-Block

They even managed to get that one wrong,

"In addition, QBT has revised the Method A and Method B product descriptions on its website,

by stating that they are now available as a SaaS platform (Software as a Service) and have

added two animations visualising the data obtained by running Method A and Method B on its

GPU testing platforms in time lapse."

Revised descriptions stating that they are *now* available...?

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/products-services

"Method A *will* be available as a SaaS (Software as a Service) client-server cloud application"

"Method B *will* be available as a SaaS (Software as a Service) client-server cloud application"

Hopefully the RNS next week will not be another disappointment full of qualifying, forward looking, words but will contain meaningful data about what has been achieved and how it has been achieved.

"Quantum Blockchain Technologies, the leading provider of blockchain and bitcoin mining solutions, is pleased to announce the completion of extensive live testing on the network of their SaaS solutions for improving the probability of solving and winning blocks. A single rack server was used to deliver pre-seeds over a period of 4 months to 500 mining rigs distributed across the US in farms operated by four of the major market players. Statistical analysis of the results demonstrated blocks were solved with an enhancement in probability of 2.7 with 3 Nines significance confirming previous lab testing. All parties who took part in the tests have now signed binding agreements to implement the companies technologies on a profit share basis which, at the scale of testing, would generate revenue of $1.5 million a month for the company. This figure will scale linearly as more rigs are on boarded."

Anything else is just pants.

"I'm going for 7p."

Sounds good to me Brew. The Trolls will be going ballistic over the weekend with their FUD campaign in an effort to put people off but we all know its coming. Happy days.

"I asked specific technical questions."

Sounds fruity. Hopefully having been prompted they will provide some meat. Fingers crossed anyway. I guess we sit an wait.

Backtracking?

"For example, the sale of his AI company. There is no doubt a company existed that was sold. However, I have looked and can find zero information in terms of who owned the comapny, who he worked with, what it was sold for etc."

Bits and bobs here,

https://www.startpage.com/do/dsearch?q=Francesco+Gardin+AISoftw%40re+filetype%3Apdf&cat=web&language=english

"Bobsocks, my email is genuine, I have no intention whatsoever of playing your silly little games which you seem to get so much perverse pleasure from, for one I wouldn't trust you one inch with any personal information, just ask CTW if it's true ffs!"

You have a link to an official website with a contact e-mail on it. You don't have to trust me with your personal information.

What you, or AHS, choose to do now has no bearing on the situation beyond providing corroborating information as you see fit.

LSEG has copies along with the background information which may or may not cause problems for yourselves should they decide to investigate further in respect of the possibility that either of you have published misinformation.

Assuming one or both of you have not published misinformation and you did receive those e-mails then, as far as I am concerned they included, disparate but nevertheless, Market Sensitive Information and I have explained as much to LSEG.

That is now out of my hands and subject to consideration by LSEG. I see no reason to bother your source.