Member Info for BobsSocks

Hours of fun. I think I'll save those for future searching for the next time NoBox(1) strings a bunch of words together and does not link to a source. More pavement munching.

"Bob, do you know what I'll just believe her for the sake of this board."

Aw. No Fun. Tell you what I'll just download all of the RNS's from here,

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/investor-relations/regulatory-news

goes back to 10th May 2023.

Then I'll stick them in a directory on my 'puter and do...

pdfgrep -R 'scientist'

on them...

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4643438/how-to-search-contents-of-multiple-pdf-files

Two files...

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/images/QBT_-_RNS_-_RD_Update_Quantum_Computing_-_LKG.pdf

That's the one that mentions Dr Grover.

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/images/QBT_-_Bitcoin_Mining_Update_Method_B_10_May_23_-.pdf

"The Company’s R&D work is both designed and carried out by a team of senior researchers, including scientists previously working as full tenured professors at leading European universities."

Ooops. No mention of there being 20 of them and this goes back to May 10th 2023 which begs the question as to whether they are still all there.

Perhaps NoBox(1) needs to try harder. As we know it is prone to stringing a bunch of words together without providing a link to evidence that they actually exist whilst claiming they are gospel.

I suppose, for the benefit of doubt, I could double check and also download the next page just in case but its not looking good for NoBox(1)

Maybe it was referring to a holiday video.

"Bob do i really have to go back that far to find it....... I like to live in the present, not the past."

If you don't NoBox(1) will continue bending your ear about it for the rest of the week. Then again if you do and it does not favour NoBox(1)'s opinion it'll just start trying to make it fit before giving up and ragging you about something else.

It's a bit of a no win situation but we all know that.

Damn right and when you find it tell everyone else the date. Oh hang on. Don't do that if it was more that about a year ago. Can't have people thinking that was then but what about now?

Looks like that sort of thing does happen. Sometimes it goes the other way.

I almost signed up for an MSc but it turned out the Proff's previous student had left something roasting in the lab over a long weekend and ended up with something strange so he wanted another student to work out what had happened.

"Do QBT have 20 world class scientists on their books?"

Dunno. Sounds like NoBox(1) is on my case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion

https://physicsworld.com/a/room-temperature-superconductor-lk-99-fails-replication-tests/

Ooooo. Are NoBox(1) and NoBox(3) ganging up on you now. That sounds a bit like bullying. Perfectly acceptable if you are a NoBoxer. Apparently death by moderation if you are correcting one of their errors though.

"I only have ONE ( 1 ) account and I am not here to cross examined by you .."

Silly person. Of course you are. The NoBoxers regularly gang up on someone asking one of there own questions saying it is not allowed and it is none of their business but it's perfectly acceptable for them to do the same. Good grief they even do it in the same message.

"Stop asking my mate hard questions. That's trolling that is.

Why are you here day in day out? Are you invested? What's your agenda etc, etc"

For a change.

I'm still worried about the level of difficulty they ran the tests at to determine that Method B made it 2.6X more likely to solve a block. Specifically did they also train their AI model at that difficulty. Without going through the numbers because they are mindbogglingly big just assume the training set was reduced to 1 billion-billion-billion-billion-billionth (etc) of the total data set.

So they rock up to a Miner and say "Wow look at this. Kool Huh?" So the miner says. "Interesting show me more on the live network." So QBT say "No problems just lend us 2,000 of your rigs for a couple of months." and the miner Uhms and Ahhs but finally says yes so they start testing and Method B fills its pants with wrong guesses because it suddenly finds it has to deal with trillions and trillions and trillions (etc) more numbers.

My wet finger says this is what has happened and now they are left with trying to find a plausible excuse they can squeeze past the nomad.

I dunno. Is it avoiding your questions by talking about tonight's curry?

"My Response Pain will be for you to list the reasons right now that you are positive on."

Now. Now. As we all know the proper response to a NoBox is to answer all their worthless questions only to be told that your answers are not good enough and then be asked them again at a later date.

Is NoBox(3) drunk yet?

"Jambone I only have the ONE account."

Good luck with that one.

Pope: "I'm Catholic."

NoBox(1): "No your not. What about reading The Beano on the Toilet?"

Pope: "I like The Beano. Reading it does not make me not Catholic."

NoBox(1): "On the Toilet it does. See. Your not Catholic."

Pope: "But I am!"

Bear: "You got Beano's"

Pope: "Why Yes."

Bear: "Come and join me in the Forest and we can get away from this idiot."

Pope: "Good Idea."

Bear: "Let's go then. Don't forget the Air Freshener."

"Can I clarify whether "exsolved gas" (the term used by NHE) is the same or different as "coming out of solution" (the wording used by He1)?"

Don't know. Exsolved Helium seems to refer to Helium released from Magnesium,

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-023-01182-7

or perhaps some other mineral. The gist appears to be that it is absorbed into the magnesium oxide, replacing the oxygen and then subsequently released due to geological action.

As such it might subsequently migrate elsewhere and become dissolved in water, or brine, and therefore NHE might be referring to the original source but, as is the case with HE1, be collecting it after release from the magnesium oxide in a different location.

What's that about?

"I think last of the stock at 0.35p is being scooped up."

I wouldn't be so certain about any short term rapid movements. A lot of stock may have been bought up recently at lower levels so the traders will be getting out and taking their profits on any rise dragging it back down again. There are also likely to be a bunch of LTH's glad to wave goodbye to the back of this based on their past experience. On top of that there are also doubts surrounding furute funding.

It's not my intention to come across as being negative, my few pennies are sitting here for the long term, it's just that I can see many reasons why this might bounce along at this level for some time before confidence builds and it starts to move. Fingers crossed it will happen but predicting huge rises in the short term is likely to result in disappointment.

Someone just bought 1.75 Million. Nothing happened.

For Chrome LSE recommends you faff about under the bonnet so you can delete all of your cookies, also trashing your settings on other sites, and that will supposedly fix the the problem. I also moved over to Firefox.

Depends on your browser.

Firefox with No-Script, Ublock-Origin and Privacy Badger will cure most if not all of your ills. No-Script will likely need tweaking.

Ah. I did just have a quick check on Hemo. I get the impression Pharma stuff is like that. Years of nothing but raising for research and then, if you are lucky, bang! Much harder for the average punter to work out whether any company in that area has prospects.

Gosh. Did HEMO say they thought they were funded to revenue and then raise?

NoBox(1) will be along in a moment to give your head a wobble. That sort of thing simply does not happen on AIM.

You're probably just trying to get in lower.