Member Info for BobsSocks

"All I can say Bobbysocks..."

You seem to have adopted an adversarial stance towards myself. If that is the case then please say so directly rather than firing what appear to be warning blanks.

"Bobsocks if you read the link you would see that is covered in the article about those with multi IDs who play it both ends. If you are not one of those flipfloppers I wonder the purpose of your response 🤔"

The response was to point out that whilst most if not all of these articles frame things from a "basher" perspective the words could quite easily be used to describe a "ramper". Whilst you mention that the article mentions those who play it both ways at the moment I cannot find such a reference. The whole thing screams "basher" so maybe I missed that.

In respect of playing things both ways that probably goes on as well as there being pure bashers and pure rampers. My experience of such articles when they are quoted at me they have come from those who I would consider to be rampers. In this case certain posters on QBT. I hope you can see how a ramper would misuse such an article to score points.

As is the case with bashers they produce little to no content or links to supporting evidence, their claims are easily discounted and, having nothing, they resort to threats, insults and personal attacks. It is hard not to respond in kind and in some respects I am still learning.

In respect of myself being a flipflopper I will form an opinion about a company as I have initially done with QBT, distinctly unfavourable, and more recently both with PREM and HE1 and generally stick with it but that may change.

In the case of the latter two I am late to the game so have not suffered as much as others may have done so whilst I might understand an sense of caution I feel the expression of negativity, some of it extreme, at this moment in time is misplaced.

Looks like NoBox(1) signed up with another account and went to trash another board I am posting to. NoBox(2) has also put in an appearance.

Obvious signs of attention seeking and jealousy there. It's not my fault that there are other companies available for investment that are streets ahead of this dog both in terms of progress and credibility.

What a pathetic little pair of NoBoxes they are.

I did wonder about CanUDance. If you check my posting history you will find that I am considered to be a basher on QBT. Make your own minds up as to whether there is any justification.

Jambone(1) and Suthy(1) are part of the Ramping crew over there. I have recently filtered them and set up Ublock-Origin to remove the green boxes. They have become NoBox(1) and NoBox(2).

It would seem that they are missing me and have chosen to leak onto this board. Today NoBox(1) published a stripped down copy of my rebuttal to CanUDance on the QBT thread removing the context.

NoBox(1) spends most of its time accusing others of being Multi-ID Shorters trying to get in lower so it should come as no surprise that they would sign up with another account in order to stalk me and try to trash a company that is streets ahead both in terms of progress and credibility compared to the dog it is trying to ramp in order to hit its exit point having been caught on the last spike above 3p.

Apologies for dragging in the infection.

"If you are a basher you will deny the contents of this link, if you play it both ways you will also deny it."

OK. But... Don't forget to flip the context. I have always found when reading such articles that it is legitimate to swap 'ramper' for 'basher' and you will find that the result is just as valid.

I see NoBox(1) is pulling its usual trick of giving incomplete copies of posts from elsewhere in order to put a different spin on the context. Rather like it does with the limited information QBT manages to release.

What is it about these people who claim to be such butter wouldn't melt good chaps then go about the place publishing such twisted and poisonous constructions?

Perhaps NoBox(3) can step up to the plate and give us a quick analysis of the underlying mindset. After all NoBox(3) does seem to have personal experience of such behavior and is prone to self analysis before descending into deflection.

Looking at the level of posting and names being dropped I'll take a guess that NoBox(1) has crawled out of bed. Must be extremely worried about the lack of updates from the company.

"Shorting stock perhaps.....Reg"

Nope. As I have repeatedly explained before I don't like Jambone and his creepy clan and I do not rate the or believe in the company. If you need to invent other excuses to reassure yourself with the same old and tired accusations then it would be pointless trying to convince you otherwise.

I have to agree with Jambone here.

This stock has had the bottom kicked out of it by a few persistent posters continually trying to spin the ongoing lack of news by making unsupportable claims as to what has been said recently and in the distant past. Unfortunately this has backfired on them because not only has it raised the expectations of the gullible who have become disillusioned it has caused other more cautious people to look into what information is available only to discover that it falls far short of the claims being made raising doubts about the company and suspicions that these people are trying to manipulate the share price upward in order to exit from their previous mistakes.

Of course it does not help that the company PR has been of such a poor level to have given them the opportunity to do this. Furthermore not only is the company failing to rise to their expectations they are also failing to deliver on their own plans in a timely manner. Unfortunately this appears to be a continuing theme in terms of delivery and whilst many might expect that from a company listed on AIM it would be nice if once in a while a company would break that mould. This doesn't seem to be the one.

That's OK. At least, if only for a while, I had won something.

"Well done, boy, you just overtook Joe, the unemployed driller, as the biggest fool on LSE, and trust me that took some doing."

Uhm. Are you replying to the wrong person?

"Hydrogen is an explosive gas, what are HE1 doing about it? It's a very important question."

I think I may have explained why they don't have to do anything about it at the concentrations they are dealing with.

Canudance may have raised a regulatory problem but I am waiting for them to link to evidence of that.

"BobSocks, thank you for your research, unfortunately, any explosive gas emitted from underground in unquantified amounts is subject to massive regulatory rules!!"

Did you notice how my research came with linked evidence. Strange to say your does not. Why would that be?

Furthermore, and someone might wish to float the idea with HE1, there is a thing called Forming Gas.

I do enjoy a bit of research.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forming_gas

"Forming gas is used as an atmosphere for processes that need the properties of hydrogen gas. Typical forming gas formulations (5% H2 in N2) are not explosive."

The above concentrations are described as being typical. HE1 have a 2% H2 in 96% forming gas once they have extracted the Helium. They can bottle and sell it as is without problems whilst they sort out dealing with pure hydrogen.

Bonus!1!

"Hydrogen is an explosive gas, what are HE1 doing about it? It's a very important question."

That's better.

Helium one has a mixture of Helium, Hydrogen and Nitrogen. Hydrogen need oxygen to ignite so it's not going to blow up down the well. Ignoring for the moment that the well and the likely extraction system will be closed, no oxygen, the hydrogen is at a concentration of 2%. You need 4% in air for it to be an ignition hazard. It is in fact less hazardous in air than hydrocarbons by virtue of the fact that quickly it floats away.

https://www.aiche.org/sites/default/files/docs/pages/the_elemental_-_hydrogen_flammability.pdf

https://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/pdfs/h2_safety_fsheet.pdf

Again given HE1 will have a closed extraction and processing system there is no immediate hazard until they choose to collect and concentrate it. For the moment and until they appraise themselves of the problems with such collection they can just let it float away or flare it off.

There is simply no basis to your scare mongering other than ignorance.

"BobsSocks, please enlighten me and why I should not short this £81 million wannabe daytime shopping channel company."

I was talking about your misplaced fear of Hydrogen. Do try to keep on topic rather than flapping off elsewhere.

I do have to say that Woooo Scary Hydrogen Fetish Person does not appear to have much knowledge about hydrogen and its relative hazards especially in regard to the circumstances surrounding the HE1 discovery. They are in fact quite ignorant so I would not place much onus on any other comment they might be prepared to make.

To help those who may have missed them and save digging.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fKY0QZeqPo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uixd2MojT8o

I think he also said he had run the mill up to 40 tonnes per hour. Ignoring whether the rest of the plant can keep up, maybe it did but at reduced efficiency due to reagent problems, isn't that Name Plate?

Seems like a much happier and more confident bunny.

Let me guess. Lots of introspection. We are worried. We are wasting our time. Questioning motives and lives. Still holding.