Member Info for BobsSocks

"What I was talking about is producing hour by hour rolling statistics, based on QBT'S calculated ranges and comparing winning hashes as the data becomes available. I would expect a good proportion of winning nonces should land within QBT's calculated ranges, if the software works as advertised."

OK. That sounds slightly different and more credible but you have just removed the rigs from the experiment and destroyed the experiment. Again it is not Science. Furthermore I could roll a Six Sided Dice with two ones, two twos and two threes on it to select nonce ranges behind closed doors and announce the results via an Oracle and claim that works. You would still be waiting a long time, 20 years, to get a poorly significant result.

"I don't think it'd be that difficult to do."

No doubt I will be slated for claiming that I have a Joint Honours Degree in Science but you have just suggested that they use the results they used to train their experiment to prove their experiment will produce those results when they run it again.

That is not Science. That is just Silly

"Any answer? From anybody?"

One on One it can't but I really doubt that it is worth explaining why because Jambone will deliberately miss the point and carry on spouting garbage whilst many others have got board with having it explained to them over and over and over again. However just in case someone new looks in,

https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_network_hash_rate

https://m.bitmain.com/product/detail?pid=00020231025110633223f8vE5pxQ06AB

524.52MTH/190TH = 2,760,631 rigs solving 1 block every ten minutes. 27,606,310 minutes for one rig to solve a block. That is 52 years and that is even before you consider that a prospective client will want to see a statistically significant result.

The only way, one on one, that they will see anything is if the difficulty is drastically reduced, number of leading zeroes drastically increased, and this is what QBT have suggested previously. The big swarm of flies in that ointment is that doing so blows statistical significance so far out of the water that the oceans are no longer on the planet.

I find it incredible that a supposed scientist would consider emitting such a mish mash of words in support of his ideas for either public or professional consumption. Another 43 seconds wasted to make yourself look clueless when twitter gives you at least two minutes, another 77 seconds, to produce a robustly credible explanation. If I was the boss of the company that employed this guy and his PR team I would have sacked them ages ago.

The video is a PR nightmare

Https://twitter.com/QBTOfficial256/status/1750428296809193901

"Our Market, there are three catagories. That's miners, mining rigs manufacturers and pools. The first approach with the miners is always the analysis of our lab results because they find it hards to believe how we can increase the probability of hashing and then the next step is to see live results, which is exactly what we are doing now. The turning point for a prospect to become a client is to see that one mining rig without our methods compared to one mining rig with our methods will show the improved performance that we have obtained in the lab. "

Reasons Later. Hexam, as is usually the case, is nailing it.

Only lost 10% in a day, spread plus costs. Nice to be part of the club :( This really is going nowhere for a long long time and that's assuming it does not go bust. Reasons later.

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Cfz33QIsdY

I shall now not spend the rest of the night working out which five letter thing I need to take care of.

Time for bed.

Sounds like a load of rubbish and Tony would probably recommend Bran Flakes these day.

Https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Case/PublicationNumber/GB2611321/Documents.

It is possible that despite the last gasp effort to ask for and then fail to fulfil a request for an extension they have in fact abandoned this one. They were previously advised by the Examiner,

https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Document/ApplicationNumber/GB2113962.1/16b26341-fe3a-444f-9221-3f1901aa4961/GB2611321-20230921-Exam%20report%20%20Standard.pdf

that there was a conflict with the PCT application, which would cover GB as a contracting state, and if a GB Grant were to be made it would subsequently be rescinded on grant through the PCT.

Certainly sucks to be me.

Grumble Grumble. I'll have to start lashing out and blaming everyone else for my rubbish trading skills.

"Hey Bubs! Coming from America I was just wondering about what sort of currency you use in the UK coz 1.7 Rubles wouldn't be worth getting out of bed for but if it was Douchmarks then I might take a punt. By the way. Where is London?"

Anyone know what that means?

"it must be the Meds!"

Nah. I've been telling these Fusion Johnnies forever they should throw away their rubbish and rebuild it according to my technology...

https://twitter.com/QBTOfficial256/status/1747891576150385094

Unfortunately I forgot to get myself an AIM listed company and change my address in London...

https://twitter.com/QBTOfficial256/status/1749703514807324727

So I could look credible.

"Not true....QBT is AI and has a Quantum Computer future."

Sorry mate. If you do not think I used Quantum Physics and Sums to implement my controlled nuclear fusion generator in Python then you do not know why the Lawson Criterion, as chased by all the others, is a dead end.

"Bob, it’s 2 lots of recorded videos, one as you say around October and the latest batch recorded sometime before Christmas."

Looking forward to seeing a source for the timing of those videos. Perhaps we should all know who has provided you with that information beyond FG taking his tie off.

"In that case Rob can you show me the competition? Anyone else got anything that is 160% more probably in wining a BTC block?"

Well... No but last time I ran a simulation of my three phase controlled nuclear fusion generator I got a simulated three cups of tea without a spell checker and the AI said it was very tasty.

"so we know this batch of x videos was recorded before christmas so a month or more ago, so…."

Some of us think it was towards the end of October and presented to to others in order to snaffle the placing money.

"1. are qbt into testing now for live periods data?"

According to them that is the plan. All they need is a victim.

"2. how long will that take to get initial data"

For something of statistical significance and based on QBT's 1 on 1 figures my guess would be 1,000 Rigs for One Month.

"3. how long for comprehensive data"

It's statistics. If I ran QBT on 1,000 rigs for One Month and saw a significant result I would commit all of my Rigs to QBT. That's probably why second place Vinanz missed out. They only have 270 Rigs and LendMeGas.

"4. do we expect a deal announced on or before the data is released to us as i’m sure the big miners will know before we do"

Probably best not to announce the data. After all it is much easier to claim a 2.6 figure 1 on 1 without mentioning the statistical stuff so idiots on investment forums will say Wow! Just say you have signed up someone with 10 Rigs.

Those seem like perfectly reasonable answers but...

"before the trolls get ****ty these are perfectly acceptable question for those invested so jog on!"

Last time I saw a piece of Gammon dishing out racial abuse on the street I intervened and was told to Jog On. I didn't. Sorry about that.

Oh Dear. It looks like Hexam did not Green Box you. Better go in for the Bonus Kill and point out to others that he is still replying to your posts. What a numpty. He does not realise that being reasonable is futile.

"Apologies Hexam."

Oh well played Sir. Top Marks for getting in the last word after being Green Boxed.

"Hope you don’t mind me bringing your post back up?"

Not at all.

Paid = Record

{definition section}

end;

var

Paid_Bashers: Array of Paid;

Paid_Rampers: Array of Paid;

implementation

There you go mate. All we need now are your details including inside leg measurement. Naturally we can assume you, and your mates will have to be assigned to the Paid_Rampers array. and proceed on the basis of Nym: String[40];

Tell you what I don't know how to implement it so I'll just assume that you and your mates are Paid_Rampers. Got a problem with that? Go suck it. I deny your denial.