Member Info for BobsSocks

I do apologise. I forgot to quote the person I was responding to.

"Lie after lie after lie from the trolls, they really are putting g in a shift tonight 😂🤡🤡"

Why don't you like being called for what you are? It's obviously got nothing to do with shame.

Why don't you like being called for what you are? It's obviously got nothing to do with shame.

You have been Jamboned. It will become relentless unless you change your tune and you absolutely will not be able to suppress despite your protestations

Not wishing to cheer you up, it sounds like you might have some heavy losses, I am in for a little £750 punt and have already lost 20% over the weekend. I am here for the spike, that will never come because Jambone and his mates are not very good at ramping but irritatingly proficient at insulting others. I might live in hope of company news but if and when that comes it will be caveated to the extent that it is worthless so I shall just watch my money disappear.

As I say it's not much but I do feel for you. Jambone is likely in the same situation. Reading his past posts it seems likely he got buried during the last spike to about 3.7p and is heavily under at the moment. Then again I get the impression he has always been some sort of fantasy tin foil bloke with little to no grasp on reality. Likely before he was castrated in the most recent decline he was still talking up this dog and dreaming of exiting at £10 plus and slating other for doubting him and the company.

Of course you will recognise from my own posts that I kind of live in my own world. I really think the company is a zero that has repeatedly proved as much and none of its claimed technology does what they think it does. At best they have made some major scientific errors in their analysis of results. Slightly worse they won't look for or accept those errors. Worst they know it doesn't work but hey, there's always the next rainbow and hunting rainbows can be profitable. Also works for punters too if the company is not too close to the end of the rainbow where, once again, there will be no pot.

Try not to stress yourself over Jambone. I did and probably still do too much. Best to ignore it for your own sanity or, if you can get used to it poke fun at it. Don't think you are hurting a person. It gives out so much more than it will ever receive and, after all, whatever it accuses anyone else of doing it is doing it first, doing it ten times worse and absolutely will not stop because it makes it feel important.

You may also, in particular, discover Suthy and Phil (The Pain). Watch out for Phil. He can be particularly nasty as he tries to get under your skin. I think Jambone acts on misdirected learned impulse but Phil really thinks hard about how he goes about attacking others when he has not been necking his Vodka with a curry.

You owe them nothing. You don't have to pander to their stupid questions because any answer you give will be rejected out of hand. That's part of their troll handbook. The same with others. Idiots like this are a dime a gross over all bulletin boards. It makes them feel big because they think it gives them some sort of control which, initially and sometimes ultimately, it does. Get over that and they are just the common bullies that they became as children.

Just kidding.

ROFL

"So looking at the trades. How are peel selling shares at 1p when they have not bought shares at 1p"

Must be forward selling the placing at 0.5p. Disgusting.

Are they talking to those 10 miners now. You don't know do you? How many did they sign up? I suppose that since they have not announced any customers we will have to assume they have none. Don't try to babble about NDA's. Many companies mention sign ups as "a top tier provider" or similar words without giving the game away. QBT could do the same but they have not so that makes it zero customers.

"So surprisingly you trolls got yesterday’s thread removed, now why was that I wonder?"

Oh go on Jambone. I'm sure it wasn't anyone of those you call trolls. Like as not you reported yourself because it made you look a bit stupid.

Nasty piece of work that Jambone. Makes claims without providing links to evidence even though they know it exists just to trap others and then demand apologies for failing to post his evidence. That's what it is all about for Jambone. Even if it puts him one down it makes him feel like he is one up and that's all that matters.

"My point is when ready for QBT deployment Companies like Terawulf are looking to capitalize on Our product!"

It's the classic if someone gives me £1Million then I will have £1Million.

"Maybe explain your comment."

It was my in context reply to your previous post requesting that I leave the treehouse based on your presumptions as to how the treehouse should be operated in your favour.

It has five uptickles so I assume five others understood it.

Why is it always someone like you that pretends to miss the point?

Enjoy the pleasure that comes from asking a stupid question and being able to say you did not receive a satisfactory answer.

Night Night.

"I'm having lasagne and I'll see you tomorrow"

Damn. There is something wrong with my chronometers.

I am certain Mr Dorsey would adopt a "You Bought it You Own it" view to whatever he might wish to sell you. It is also very likely that he would be happy to help you, as an individual, to adapt it for your own purposes as long as is was not to use it to make Phil a lasagne. Then again if it gets hot enough to cook one, one off, and the result would not poison you he probably wouldn't be bothered either.

"If I was in the game my money would be on using the software which makes me the most coin, harsh but true!"

Seems reasonable. All you would sensibly need is evidence that your purchase does what it says on the tin but then sense does not seem to be one of your strongest instincts.

"Bob, looking in, LSE built the site for people to discuss there investments, so far we have more people here who aren’t invested constantly giving their negative view than those invested."

Thanks. I currently have £750 of my spons riding on this dog in the diminishing hope of a ramper driven spike that is largely reliant on your skills and therefore I have little to no hope so you are gently asked to shut up.

Apparently that is a thing.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/feb/04/meta-backed-case-seeks-high-court-ruling-bitcoin-founder-identity

"The latest features the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (Copa), an organisation whose members include Dorsey’s payment company, Block, and the cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase. It is asking the high court in London for a ruling, or negative declaration”, that Wright is not Nakamoto."

Hang on Jack Dorsey!1! Isn't he the bloke who is going to be cooperating with QBT to get their patent pending stuff installed on the hardware he robbed of them and his ASICS and other stuff. How does that one fit in with being a member of The Open Patent Alliance unless QBT, at a bare minimum. signs up to some sort of frand agreement?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_and_non-discriminatory_licensing

Bit of a shame that. All the rampers were promising so much and it turns out that Jack Dorsey is a Multi-ID self upticker trying to get in lower.

Phil.

This is not *your* TreeHouse.

You, Jambone and Suthy might want it to be but LSE built it and you, along with others who make use of it are guests.

Get over it.

"The answer to this is 5. Based on empirical evidence."

The argument was of itself empirical because QBT do not provide much if any evidence to support their claims forcing us to consider other evidence that can be experienced.

Did you spend a lot of time in the corner during your Logic and Philosophy Degree (pun not intended but ROFL)

Anyway to add further boredom,

"The research results and the statistical methodology used to validate them give the Company confidence that the research approach being used has uniquely identified some properties of the SHA-256 space that other research teams have not detected."

I think QBT might be asking a bit too much from their "statistical methodology" which could be why they have not given it. Either that or they have an NDA with themselves.

No Phil. That sounds like the number of crayons you might personally have taken off the other kids in the classroom. Now go sit in the corner.

Part 2)

So. In Part 1) we blew the budget on £25Million of storage as just under a tonne of 4TB 990 PRO PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSDs which gives us 400,000TB of storage. It takes us 10 minutes to fill up each one but let's say we have an aditional budget to buy 1,000 Bitmain T21s. Shut up at the back with your why didn't we do that and mine our own bitcoin and stop ticking up your own posts!! A T21 costs $3,185.00 or £2,500. That's only another £2.5Million so no worries. Now we can generate our user database in 1,000 minutes. Wow, that's just under 16 Hours. That's quite reasonable.

Great. Now we have our database. All quite possible after all. Shut up at the back. We would have rented some big buildings and landfill plus solved the employment problems for a small country!!!.

Where was I? Oh yes we have our 400,000TB database. Thats 200,000TB for inputs and 200,000TB for outputs. Each input/output requires 256 bits or 32 bytes, I thought it was 64 but the numbers would still be silly. So we can store 6.25 x 10^16 solutions and train our neural networks on them. Ooops, we only have one nearal network to write to and the time it takes for them to swallow and resolve an input/output solution, I believe the term here is an epoch, will be quite slow? Let's say they can do it at the same speed as our SSD's. That will only take 9 x 10^6 seconds or 17 years.

Our database now has 6.25 x 10^16 solutions of the possible 1 x 10^77 solutions. In SNR terms that's 20log(6.25E16/1E77) or -1204dB. For the non-technical it's quite hard to get a handle on what that number means but let's throw the x10 improvement in in a non scientific way and call it -1021dB.

Interlude...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38mE6ba3qj8

Elsewhere to get a better idea,

https://lisa.nasa.gov/

"LISA is Extremely High Precision

These signals are extremely small and require a very sensitive instrument to detect. For example, LISA aims to measure relative shifts in position that are less than the diameter of a helium nucleus over a distance of a million miles, or in technical terms: a strain of 1 part in 10 x 10^20 at frequencies of about a millihertz."

That's golden cubes, not balls, in spacecraft at three Lagrange Points One Million Miles apart operating with signals at -400dB. That is 621dB worse, easier, than what QBT is claiming to do. That's 1.12 x 10^31 times easier.

Of course if you want to take a punt on those numbers you might want to ask yourself "Do you feel lucky Punk?"

Part 1)

https://sciencenotes.org/how-many-atoms-are-in-the-world/

The number of atoms in the world is around 1.3 x 10^50

How many numbers can SHA256 produce.

2^256 or 1.16 x 10^77

Each of those numbers in binary are 256 bits long so to store the numbers available from SHA256 you would need,

2.96 x 10^78 bits

If each atom in the world represented one bit then you would need 2.28 x 10^28 Worlds. We are talking really really really numbers here.

QBT claim that they can increase the probability of finding a solution by 2.6 times. In order to do so they claim to have trained an AI model, a neural network, to perform this incredible feat. It is interesting to note that in,

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/images/QBT_-_Bitcoin_Mining_Update_Method_B_10_May_23_-.pdf

QBT suggest,

"The research results and the statistical methodology used to validate them give the Company confidence that the research approach being used has uniquely identified some properties of the SHA-256 space that other research teams have not detected."

However QBT have chosen not to give details of their statistical methodology so we are left with rolling our own numbers.

Let's say that Method B increases the possibility of finding a solution by a factor of 10 and SHA256 can produce 1 x 10^77 solutions from 1 x 10^77 inputs. In order to train their neural network they have to provide it with a set of both inputs and outputs which they claim to have generated themselves from SHA256.

Taking an 8 bit byte as the unit of storage then for the whole data set they would need two lots of 3 x 10^78 bits or 3.75 x 10^77 bytes. Again this is many many many bytes. An Unobtanium amount.

Whilst miners can hash at an amazing rate the numbers still have to be stored on a non-volatile medium so let's say they use,

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/375227977807?hash=item575d54904f:g:UkkAAOSw2U1lt8Ru

4TB for £250 Let's look at the actual thing,

https://www.samsung.com/uk/memory-storage/nvme-ssd/990-pro-4tb-nvme-pcie-gen-4-mz-v9p4t0bw/

The write speed is 6,900MB/s. A terabyte is 10^12 bytes so they would fill one up in 580 seconds or 9.7 minutes. Each one weighs 9g so ignoring practicalities let's buy about tonne. That gets us 100,000 drives for £25Million which is already silly money. It is also silly because you would have to unpack them and plug them in. Maybe it's time to rethink things. However,

"We set up three AI groups...each Group is led by a top AI expert, a professor...[each] use AI in a different way, use different data from a user database we have created of execution of the SHA-256 algorithm...We have managed to find regularities with three different approaches...It's not just a coincidence, this is a recurring element that we have discovered...which is what allows us to out-perform brute force."

QBT claim to have this database so we are stuck with it. That's a bit of a shame.

I see Jambone has finally capitulated and provided links to evidence to back up its claims. Unsurprisingly it is still trying to score points against people for not believing it without that evidence. Life would have been so much easier if it would have given those links in the first place but that is not the way Jambone milks thing.

For those who can't be bothered with the tortuous opt-out mechanism employed by Vox Markets the posdcasts are available on Audioboom. They do include the links to the associated RNS announcements but I have give the direct ones from the QBT site to avoid Vox Markets.

First podcast for £1Million 1st June 2023

https://audioboom.com/posts/8310319-francesco-gardin-of-quantum-blockchain-funds-raised-continues-the-development-of-our-cutting-edg

RNS here,

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/images/QBT_-_010623_-_1m_Placing.pdf

Second podcast for £2Million 30th October 2023

https://audioboom.com/posts/8392250-francesco-gardin-of-quantum-blockchain-2-million-raised-will-fund-the-company-through-to-revenue

RNS here,

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/images/QBT_-_Placing_30_Oct_23_final_-.pdf

Both podcasts contain the following disclaimers,

"Nothing in this podcast is intended as investment advice and the people in this podcaast may hold positions in the stocks they talk about. Do not buy anything based solely on a tip or recommendation. Please do your own research."

It is worth comparing the contents of the podcasts to the contents of the associated RNS announcements. Again the company and FG are limited as to what they can claim in an RNS whereas they can and do get away with suggesting additional information outside of them.