Member Info for BobsSocks

Typical Jambone.

Accuses someone of making defamatory accusations...

"Bobprat1, you have made defamatory accusations against Suthy which are simply not true."

...by making a defamatory accusation.

Isn't this always the case with our protectors and heroes Jambone and his like? They are allowed to repeatedly make slurs against others but should such accusations be thrown back at them life is so unfair and blub, blub, blub.

"Now 6 ticks up for that with zero proof hey Bobcat, that will just be a start to the amount of accounts you are controlling."

"Any other ideas?"

Yes! Multi_ID shorting troll boiler room rampers trying to get in at a lower price before news drops all upticking each other.

There you go Jambone. I thinks that's covered 90% of your posts for the day so, unless you need to put your head up Suthy's bottom, you can take the day off.

Got bigger.

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareShortPositions.html?shareprice=QBT&share=Quantum-Block

I am sure someone will be along soon to explain when a short is a long or a long is a short and all about the openings and closings of them.

You never admit you were wrong. First you change the words. Then you change the meaning of the words. Then you say the words meant something else. Then you say the other person did not understand the words because they are illiterate or the person using the words were not talking in their first language. Then you say the other person has multiple accounts. Then you say they are upticking their own posts and trying to get in lower as well as being part of a boiler room operation. You never, never, never admit you were wrong. Rinse Repeat. Day In. Day Out

"Because they hide behind anonymity,"

Lives abroad.

Connects via a VPN.

Boasts about being untraceable.

Changes Username/Email to avoid detection.

Upset that others are 'anonymous'.

Everyone shall abide by my rules and instructions apart from me.

MMs seem reluctant to bring the price back up despite buys exceeding sells most of the day. Probably preparing to close their books.

Hey folks. Let's all buy in so Jambone can hit their exit point. ISTR it's about 3.7p Then they can go off and lose it all on GST and leave this board alone.

Https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Case/PublicationNumber/GB2611321/Documents

Chill RNS,

"Chill Brands is committed to strict compliance with all relevant laws and the Company's existing nicotine-free vape products are differentiated through the inclusion of USB-C recharging ports. This feature sets Chill Brands' vape product apart from more commonplace disposable options, providing for a longer period of use by consumers."

Victoria Atkins,

"The health secretary, Victoria Atkins, said ministers would consult on how best to implement the changes, including making sure firms did not try to skirt the ban by attaching charging points to disposable vapes."

"Let's be reminded that Suthy doesn't talk or worry about daily fluctuations. Expect hourly updates (only when rising)"

This is not financial advice. Just my made up made up stuff.

It is an interesting non-metric though. As others have suggested we might get some idea as to when QBT launches their tests because their will be a visible disruption to the market.

Given BitCoin will be easier to mine and there will be a lag before the network difficulty is adjusted to cope with the change we might be wiser to watch out for a decline in the price.

This is one of the reasons why you should probably not listen to simpletons who are prone to making zero order guesses at second or higher order problems.

I assume they end up being trapped in a share having bought on the spike and having to ramp like crazy to find an exit. Sometimes that might work but you have to rank their quality, and that of the company itself, before buying in yourself and getting in on the last one on the, well researched, assumption that it will arrive.

"AIMhigher, you have more posts than me 🤯"

Based on the available evidence...

https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/jambone/

438

https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/aimhigherstill/

184

...that would seem to be wrong.

Gosh. That's never happened before.

"Lol, nice try Bob, as I said I bought mainly in CLp days hence why I know a big part of the history, keep tryin Bobby boy."

Yeah but you said Zak Mir said that this was going to hit 4p end of this January. Back when CLP was about Zak Mir probably had hair.

Are you saying you visited an Italian Water Park ages ago and got sold a time share?

"Bobcat, can you please share your wisdom to why this is going to 4p I seem to remember before it burns?"

Zak Mir said so. I do wish you could keep up.

🐂💩 Jambone

You have forever multiple thousands of ramping posts in QBT.

All the hallmarks of buying high and sitting on a massive loss.

Not hard to spot is it!

I have to say I am quite disgusted to hear that AHS is not a resident of this country.... from someone who regularly claims not to be a resident of this country. Which one of these bad bois should I put my faith in?

"I've blocked them both now."

"I only have one green bar and that you, why?"

Please do try to gain some consistency. I would have thought that amongst numerous usual suspects that one of your most often used ramping Trolls is to accuse someone who has claimed to have blocked you has been looking. Then you go pavement plant your own face into the same accusation.

"So let’s be clear Bob, that’s your view and you don’t know, sounds great for a negative post agenda but I would say your post is a pile of 💩"

Indeed. Although clarity is not your best attribute it is a great negative post. Thanks for the recognition. However I happen to be a qualified Scientist and you think you have to dial pizza with your pants on your head because you get a better 7g signal.

Well... Make your own minds up,

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/jhCKYQ10zHy-fp1MkSXG8WaUEl8/appointments

It's not a complete list but good luck if you can find any shareholder success in that lot.

The best I can see for anything that is not dissolved or about to be gazetted in preparation for dissolution are a bunch of interrelated yet disparate entities dependent on their ongoing concern status based ultimately on a promise to find cash from elsewhere with warnings from the auditors.

For the fun of it. No QBT have not published anything about their AI product or had it meaningfully externally reviewed. Furthermore as far as I am aware no-one else has carried out similar research. The general consensus appears to be that SHA256 does what it says on the tin and it is not subject to attack by AI pattern matching. It was developed by The NSA and adopted by NIST after a wide consultation with the clever people. I would expect that if QBT had anything then the men in black would have paid a visit or changed the algorithm to lock them out.

However, and depending on how Blockchain really works...

https://twitter.com/QBTOfficial256/status/1722524469409747282

It is my view that if QBT have found anything from analysing previous solutions in order to train their AI products then they have not found patterns within SHA256 but rather they have found patterns in the methods used to generate the blocks that SHA256 is expected to solve.

This is the Garbage In Garbage Out problem but perhaps written smaller. The solution is that you sanitise the input to correct for the flaw that QBT has discovered. Of course when people become aware that this is the problem they will sanitise their inputs and the rolling QBT fantasy will die. Bad luck chaps.

"Both sides quoting 1 rig test."

Cough. I've been banging on for some time about the one rig fallacy. It's the other side who repeatedly insist it has some meaning.

"BobS .... you can't take the assumed potential loss straight up to 7.6million in my example about Mara."

That is however the assumed potential loss that someone is going to have to sign off on. It's very easy to shout from the sidelines but that is not your choice to make.

However I do take your point that a phased scale up might be a more acceptable approach. That would take quite an amount of additional planning in terms of start up levels, metrics and cutoffs.