Member Info for BobsSocks

"How do you know he has nothing."

No RNS. Simples. Just like you.

Https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareShortPositions.html?shareprice=QBT&share=Quantum-Block

Don't moan at me about the companies poor PR but all we have is some words from a video that suggest live testing is the next phase and might have already started. I'm not sure how that one works if you assume the videos sre snippets from the same production that began about the start of last November given they would not have banked the cash to start this live testing at that time. In the meantime there has been no announcement about anything via RNS and you would have thought that the commencement of live testing would be a major event requiring such an announcement. No amount of warbling by Jambone can get over that one although I can be sure we'll get the usual FG would not have said it if blah blah blah. No RNS... Hasn't happened. End of.

Sorry missed that. I went in pants down and got an advert for a BitCoin game. You know. They are the ones people from Third World countries get muled to play in the expectation of wealth beyond their dreams. Second time someone advertised another thing I was not interested in. Google has a strange algorithm.

Anyway I finally got to see the full Al Jazeera, who say they are funded in part or in whole by the Quatiri Government so I need to check that one out for bias, report and seeing the crowd wondered if they had experienced an AC/DC concert because it did not look like the crowd was showing much enthusiasm for the On Stage Crypto Bros explaining how half of their money would go on BitCoin and the other half on a Volcano to power the generation of their BitCoin,

I assume that might include a secret submarine lair for Il Presidente. Perhaps he can share holiday videos with FG.

Anyway. I tried to check out AC/DC live El Salvador and I ended up with another Bitcoin game intro advert prior to Live at The River Plate. Which is nowhere near El Salvador but from a historical perspective it is where us Brits stuffed the Germans like wot we did with Brexit and, should any local Gammon wish to experience it again I was surprised to find a copy on You-Tube. The old ones are always the best and I shall be, slowly, snaffling a copy for myself,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8bISpsdoZM

YMMV but I think it might be legit unlike the ones where you get the first three minutes and then you are invited to visit a dodgy website to get the full version. Ding! Ding!

OK back to AC/DC Live at The River Plate,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCC8gWTOkEk

You really need Firefox with No-Script to avoid the BitCoin mining game adverts but notice how the audience is slightly more energised compared to the presentation given by the Crypto Bros in El Salvador. I'll take a guess that the AC/DC audience paid for their tickets and enjoyed themselves whilst the Cryto Bros audience was bussed in on the promise of an Air Drop and ended up with nothing apart from being poorer.

Grumble Argentinians and The Malvinas. Blooming Politicians. Look at them sweat. Monster.

Ah well. Cat is scratching at the door so I suppose I shall have to go out and harvest BitCoin from my neighbours gardens. It's a brilliant excuse for the missing panties.

Night Night.

Apologies for being a link freak.

https://noblehelium.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/MST-Access-NHE-Update-Report-24Aug23.pdf

Page 10)

I just have a thing about people quoting stuff without giving the source. In this case what appears to be an Australian company doing the same sort of thing as HE1 as what appears to be a brokers note. Sure it may be competition but why try to hide in your Telegram Group it if it proves the model.

"Bob, this may or may not be of interest to you … bit too complicated for my little brain."

Way above my simple head as well. You can get what I think might be the full text here,

https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:3ae9ffba-9d91-4464-a889-3761983ff307/files/s5425kb64h

Going for a quick, know nothing, read of the first few pages there seems to be a difference expressed between crust and mantle derived sources. This will probably be wrong but crust is what we live on and mantle is the Semi liquid gloopy stuff that makes volcanoes.

Again on a know nothing basis if HE1 have hit a bunch of gloopy derived stuff then it might be a reservoir that will not be filled again and will run out.

However if they have hit a bunch of crustal stuff it might be from an in place deposit of Uranium/Thorium that is actively producing new decay products which, depending on its rate of production, might be initially harvested at a monster rate and subsequently still be viable at lower levels in the future.

Again this is all mad speculative nonsense but the RNS suggests they have Geothermal Energy at 80C and,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_gradient

"temperature rises in about 25–30 °C/km (72–87 °F/mi) of depth near the surface in most of the world"

So, ignoring Global Warming, they might expect 60C but they get 80C and,

"The major heat-producing nuclides in Earth are potassium-40, uranium-238, uranium-235, and thorium-232"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potassium-40

"Potassium-40 undergoes three types of radioactive decay. In about 89.28% of events, it decays to calcium-40 (40Ca) with emission of a beta particle (β−, an electron) with a maximum energy of 1.31 MeV and an antineutrino. In about 10.72% of events, it decays to argon-40"

Argon.

I know nothing, but it suggests that they have drilled into somewhere in the crust that is full of radioactive elements that have spent a long time producing this commercially viable Helium and the other stuff and, subject to things above my head, will remain productive for some time to come.

Oh. From the RNS,

"helium began to flow to surface following reverse circulation and yielded a compositional mix up to 4.7% helium, 1.5% argon, 8% oxygen and 86% nitrogen."

What did they reverse circulate it with? I am assuming they had to pump something down to get the stuff out and would take a guess at Nitrogen. Trust me when I suggest I am on for the monster ramp here but if I wanted to reverse circulate gases I would use Nitrogen,

https://techxplore.com/news/2022-12-simulations-nitrogen-flush-oil-underground.html

Did they subtract the Nitrogen from their assay?

Just going off on a ramble whilst you lost chat about legs up, bags and takeovers.

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/HE1/itumbula-west-1-well-flows-helium-4-7-to-surface/16317286

"When performing the Basement DST, high concentrations of helium began to flow to surface following reverse circulation and yielded a compositional mix up to 4.7% helium, 1.5% argon, 8% oxygen and 86% nitrogen."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Earth

"As of 2023, by mole fraction (i.e., by number of molecules), dry air contains 78.08% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.04% carbon dioxide, and small amounts of other gases."

You might assume that 'atmosphere' below the ground might be slightly different to the stuff that we breathe but given these people at HE1 are drilling it would it be possible for them to figure out just what they have drilled into based on the percentage mix on the assumption that some, part, or all of the differences in composition have resulted from nuclear decay.

I mean... like. A big Uranium deposit might be expected to produce a different profile compared to a big Thorium one. Also there might be an indication of the rate of production over time versus the rate of leakage that affects the overall profile of gas recovered.

Let's say Hydrogen, being smaller, leaks faster than Helium but the rate of production, Uranium vs Thorium, and leakage, Helium vs Hydrogen, indicates that the area is actively producing stonk loads of new Helium rather than being a reservoir of old stuff that will run out once it has been tapped.

For those who did not notice and wish to pile in I do apologise for having an interest in Physics and science in general. This has been a mild ramp at the technical level from someone who may not know stuff.

"smelly sockers ****r

well known on qbt"

Which I happen to have sold in order to invest in HE1. The technicals here make so much more sense.

"Worth reading the research paper here ... it is technical."

Thanks.

Assuming it works the direct link is here.

https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/pdf/10.1144/petgeo2021-029?download=true

There was no mention of gas, natural gas, in the flow percentages. I get the impression that Helium from a gas well is more or less a byproduct and may or may not be at commercial levels. However the accumulated Helium will have resulted from radioactive decay from stuff like Thorium or Uranium. Might I assume therefore that HE1 have not drilled a gas well but, by design, drilled into a belt of radioactive material as indicated by the elevated temperatures, assuming that the depth in geothermal terms would not normally support such temperatures and it is the result of radioactive decay. Ignoring how much Helium they might ultimately get out of it is it possibly to chemically leach the stuff and if so do they now also have a Thorium/Uranium Well?

"There's nothing bad about working for Tesco's,

Although having BS (lol) as a junior colleague, well..."

Well. There you go. These are the words of someone with management experience at Tesco. It does go some way to explaining the feigned superiority and the overall poor performance.

"And yet you spend hours posting drivel here."

It is only drivel to you because you put your teabag in the milk and then add tepid water.

"And then there is the straw clutching who think they are more clever than the experts who know all about Quantum computing and mining, now I wonder who we should listen to

1. The experts

2. The resident naysayer"

There's another sound trolling ploy often used by those who believe they are proficient at trolling, or indeed ramping, but generally fall far short of the mark in both fields.

In order to assess the experts do we believe...

1) The resident ramper who is qualified in burger flipping and conspiracy theories.

2)The resident naysayer who is qualified in Physics, Chemistry, Computing and Electronics and Communications Engineering.

🤔

"Not sure if this was posted before but we appear to be onto something- just need it to work with partners.."

Sorry but that's just indicative of the level of poor thinking and straw clutching that goes on here. If and when Quantum Computing becomes sufficiently advanced to either,

1) Work with QBT's fabled methodologies.

2) Break SHA256

Then it is game over for Bitcoin in its present form. Of course for QBT this is good because no doubt Bitcoin or a derivative of it will be re-purposed under a new technology and QBT can proclaim that they have discovered a magic thing based on whatever the new buzz words become that improves mining.

"Jeez. My son has less words to write for his dissertation."

Nice.

However assuming that is the case then perhaps he might reconsider his choice of educational establishment.

This is the Thesis by Rahul P. Naik

http://www.nicolascourtois.com/bitcoin/Optimising%20the%20SHA256%20Hashing%20Algorithm%20for%20Faster%20and%20More%20Efficient%20Bitcoin%20Mining_Rahul_Naik.pdf

Which is the precursor for the first patent application filed by QBT,

https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Case/PublicationNumber/GB2611321

For his MSc Degree in Information Security at University College London.

It's only 65 pages long.

Are you feeling stupid now? No I didn't think so. Very strange how people sitting on life changing losses lash out at others for situations they created for themselves.

I do hope your Son, whichever subject he has chosen to follow, gets the opportunity to write many more words than myself in a more constructive and meaningful manner and as a result you will become proud of him and listen to his advice in the future.

https://archive.org/details/12AngryMen1957

"They will have been given access to all the workings of the algorithm and shown it is real and honest. Not a fraud ."

Sounds a bit like straw clutching and you expect people to accept your binary choice. It's another ploy regularly used bt troll but I am sure you are not one.

Your other option would be Eufingest are between a rock and a hard place. They demand their money back and blow up the company or they extend and hope, like someone sitting on losses that they have not as yet crystallised, that something happens.

"Also bobsocks if your wife had a baby you would be a father. Not could."

Depends on who made the deposit. After all. You've got to be in it to win it.

"Awl - If good news drops this could go ballistic"

"Awl - If my wife has a baby then I could be a Father."

"Promotion to who? Please don't tell me the intended audience for these videos was prospective clients?"

I also would very much doubt it. The level of the presentations would be more like that you would use to whizz bang prospective investors with little to no technical knowledge into coughing up cash for the last placing. Unfortunately whilst they might have hooked their prospects exposure to a wider audience demonstrated that there are other investors with a better sense of what QBT might be trying to achieve and, for them, the material fell short of expectations.

It would make more sense to me that on the assumption that the response came from the PR team and it would have been the PR team that generated the material they had a bit of a panic themselves and pulled the plug. As I have suggested before I am surprised FG, who should know and be able to express his technology better than anyone else did not try to do a better job of it rather than read a prepared script from a marketer that treats everything as a Fast Moving Consumer Product, bar of soap.

As we can see on this board, apart from the lower quality rampers, there are a number of people that can cope with higher level communications and don't like having things explained to them like they are children. Again this excludes the lower quality rampers among us.

Someone else probably has?

https://spectrum.ieee.org/mathematical-model-ai

"MIT and IBM Find Clever AI Ways Around Brute-Force Math The technique could drastically cut AI training data requirements."

Given my previous rambling about Signal To Noise Ratio and my inability to see how QBT can claim what they claim let's assume they can because they have managed to "drastically cut AI training data ". It's the only way.

If that were to be the case and their technology were to be generally applicable, i.e. not bounded to blockchain, then they might have something worth more and more beneficial than they realise. Again personally I think it is all rubbish but perhaps they should have a chat with MIT and IBM.

Of course, just in case you miss it, your big caveat is that MIT and NASA are using reliable and predictable mathematical models to provide the data to AI and not some SHA256 thing that is accepted to reliably produce 1.6 x 10^27 unpredictable numbers.