Member Info for Blue-Eyes

Bonkers going to buy another tranche

I think it's a combination - trump tweeting that a china trade deal is near, dollar going up (although he won't be happy about that, flash US data and pressure on PM's . Just always feels like the time to start buying.

I'm expecting a final flush out hence I enter in tranches but in terms of where I think things are going I'm happy to build a position here

Funnily enough I sold some FXPO to buy this - FXPO looked similarly bombed out when I bought there and I've kept my free shares but for me it was more about where you see what they mine in the future and what you believe about the markets in general. I don't trust Trump and I don't trust the markets atm

Plus HOC is down too

I doubt it's that as the comment from the company was that as per protocol it was insured. Just bt a second tranche and monitoring

Opened a position here too

Surprised to see these here so bought some at this price.

Who knows - apparently they were insured so not an issue in that respect.

China US trade talks - apparently it's not such a done deal as previously announced although "still likely " tariffs will be lifted. Trumps mates must be making a fortune ...................

Perhaps this - not a road show but it's the only thing I can see for the end of the month
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/scottish-oil-club-28-nov-london-robert-trice-hurricane-energy-tickets-70607584185

Yeah I do recall another poster who unearthed something that made the eventual transfer easier. I think initially because they were reinvesting part of what they originally took out especially RC you (I) always assumed they believed in the company prospects but the longer it went on whilst they achieved little other than kicking the can down the road you then added up what they were taking in terms of salary, pension, office rental etc etc and the scales kinda tipped back again. When things fail through sheer bad luck they you live with it - you are essentially making a gamble albeit you think you've done your research I just think that to continue saying some of the things that were said wasn't right any way that you look at it. When a certain employee told a stricken shareholder how excited he was about taking Bentley to production I believe that person knew full well that it wasn't with Xcite , there is a special place in hell for you. Interestingly the one bought in to sort the finances out and who made the comment at that last AGM is still incumbent too. I can live with the lower oil prices quite happily even though it impinges on my other investments if it means that those that remain never get that oil out of the ground. Does that sound spitefull!!!!! :))

Hello you! Yes I did ....................................and then I moved! Not too far from the old place but somewhere where I'm not a slave to a garden. Don't miss the back ache. Hope all is good with you.
The same old nonsense continues to be peddled with the same lifestyle companies, slippery brokers and share placings to pay their over inflated wages, I don't know about you but I learnt plenty here. I think the mistake we made was simply believing what the BOD said - when I look back I see now just how woolly the actual RNS's were and how they padded out the details of what they wanted us to believe in their video updates or other non regulatory channels. The stuff coming back from that last AGM where they were telling shareholders that they were "totally aligned with the bondholders, more so then you would think" couldn't have been further from the truth as it later transpired so was anyone really that delusional at that point? The swiftness with which some posters were slapped with threatening solicitors letters was surprising so imv expected. Believe it or not I met some really great people via this share some of whom I remain in contact with the only regret I have is that the BoD didn't share the pain and a certain employee of Xcite got to keep his job but ultimately he knows that he lied to a seriously ill man. If that doesn't keep him awake at night now then I hope that when he reaches the point in life that comes to us all that he wonders how hot the fire really is down there!

As far as I recall it all part of the stich up. I can't remember which of the associated bunch of con merchants it was but one of them, in order to provide funding insisted on the cancellation of the RBL

From what I hear I think they believe they have a grievance . It's not about anyone caving in it's about upholding agreements that were made, parcelforce and the bullying culture within the company. From the conversation I had RMG employees feel more strongly now than the last time. The results will be interesting.

https://www.energyvoice.com/oilandgas/north-sea/208417/serica-looking-at-serious-north-sea-acquisition-opportunities/?utm_source=twitter

Conroy is a serial offender so every chance of being right at some point. The fact is that they have no income so have to keep placing to keep the lights on and them in the kind of lifestyle they have grown to expect.

Yes placing's do happen on AIM but the idea is that you use the money raised to advance the company to the point where it supports itself by generating revenue - Conroy has been a serial offender with this and CGNR in blowing mostly hot air. Take a long look at the history of CGNR and ask yourself what he has actually achieved.

Most of the people who you perceive as being negative on companies like this have had their fingers burnt here or elsewhere. We see the flurry of RNS's, the prof getting "excited" yet again and the concerted effort to push the sp up in advance of that next placing.

You and me are simply the guys they are looking to land on that spike if they can generate it, whilst they, in many cases are also forward selling those placing shares.

It's not you that other posters are trying to belittle it's charlatans like the "prof" that they would like to see starved out.

The best thing that shareholders here can do is play them at their own game and trade the backside off it

I have no idea why the disposals in Vedanta by the Indian tax office are allowed to continue as they have until the holding is all but gone.

Surely that holding or any money made should have been held in escrow dependant upon the result of the arbitration.

It's always more difficult to extract monies owed when the other party has spent it

Totally agree - it looks greedy and cynical.

When you break it down it's a huge bunce on top of decent wages

Yep :)