Well I've bought my average down considerably - irritated that I've had to do it on the back of the concert party behaviour but maybe I'll thank them for it one day. I honestly didn't expect to be buying these at this price again but feel a lot more confident to buy now the detractors have been roundly rubbished and put back in their box.
TBH at this point I couldn't care less = let the day traders do their thing. The only thing I care about is the fact that there is no nasty skeleton in the cupboard which undermines the whole HUR concept as a certain concert party of posters spread across various BB's twitter etc would have us believe.
RE: Cash surges to $157m from $81.4m in 6 months29 Jan 2020 08:42
Totally agree - I'm a L/T holder here and logic was telling me that the kind of insidious and even outright lies that were being posted would have to merit a response by the company if true but even so in spite of all that I lacked the confidence yesterday to average down. If AIM wasn't such bandit infested cesspit and that includes the CEO's and you didn't see so many companies blatantly flout the rules it would help but like you I feel that they should have put it to bed earlier. I'm just glad they covered it in the RNS on 3 aspects - operational, commercial and subsurface
Is he actually insane! Who would spend quite so much time and effort in wrecking their own investment. IF he really believes everything he says then why on earth is he still holding Does he check his PF see loads more wiped off it and comfort himself by thinking that at least he has an audience??? I'd sell the shares and buy smartie orange buttons with the proceeds. You could still pet yourself for being right if your prophecy came true
Andy - Surely that's the point though - if as you say the two don't tally and the sp indicates an issue then under the rules of disclose HUR have to disclose. The demise of the sp should surely force their hands under the rules
If there is nothing wrong just false rumours then they have nothing to disclose. The fact that this has been going on for weeks and HUR have done precisely that then the BoD are either acting like bandits or there really has been no change to what was indicated in the RNS reference the performance of the EPS.
RE: Re-Post Per 12 Analysts Covering Hurricane Energy according to Bloomberg Terminal ANR Function Aver28 Jan 2020 13:59
Where rumours are false or press speculation is groundless, a company is under no obligation to issue denials. Untruths can’t amount to inside information.
But where rumours or speculation are largely correct, the company needs quickly to decide whether it has inside information that should be released. Once news has leaked, delay can no longer be justified, and directors need to ensure that the market is trading on the basis of accurate information that is available to all.
Soooooo since HUR are clearly aware of the rumours and have said nothing does this means we can assume they are false?
RE: Re-Post Per 12 Analysts Covering Hurricane Energy according to Bloomberg Terminal ANR Function Aver28 Jan 2020 13:53
If there is bad news from management - most investors will be out for blood.....
Tend to agree - I think the directors of the company would be in a dodgy position if something came out now. They have to act as soon as it becomes apparent that anything that affects the value of the company " is out there" so that all shareholders are on an equal footing and since they have done nothing at all in spite of the share price acting as if something ails then I think they could very fairly be heavily criticised
I'd like to average down but wary of it presently. One thing about being invested in that other one is that I don't put much in AIM stocks anymore but even so it makes a particularly irritating picture when I log onto HL. Still at least Trice and Co didn't sell here which in hindsight was a red flag on that other one.
Had to go out this pm but came back to this from HL on all three graduated orders I left.
This is an email to serve as notification that your limit in SQZ has been met but unfortunately, the price has moved back outside your limit before it was possible to deal.
Your order has therefore been restored to pending on your account.
After the share price reaches the limit price or stop price you set we will attempt to place your deal in the market. However, share prices can change in seconds and if a share price has moved by the time we attempt to place your deal it may not be executed at the price you have set, or at all.
Sod it is all I can say - had a feeling about where it might go to. Never mind I'll haunt them until I get my top up. If I don't get it I don't mind but I'm not going to pay the top of a 6 - 7% spread. I'll be averaging up anyway . Congratulations to anyone who was around to manually press the button.
Anyone here remember the RKH group that was exposed on II some years ago when one of the members became disgusted with what they were doing and posted up all the emails. A lot of them were employed within the industry. The squealing about having names exposed was almost comical as they were having a panic about their jobs totally missing the point that what they were doing was market abuse anyway
It's not just him there is also cover on Twitter from this other chap that seem to know AD. The company have made it clear what they think backed by their data and knowledge on a day to day basis of how the EPS is performing but these people can continue to push their view unhindered knowing full well that there is a window until CMD.
I wondered if they were filling an order - make people think the sp is dropping fast so they sell but deter anyone from buying at the same time. Yesterday I placed various small orders at varying prices and they managed to get hopped over or slid under without being filled . In the last half hour of yesterday at least two of my orders should have been filled.