Member Info for blitzed

mikemike, are you suffering from some kind of memory loss? Or are you some kind of Trump character where you think you can repeat things often and loud enough and people won't remember? Don't you remember the last time you accused me of not being invested here and I posted a link to a screenshot of my holdings?

In which case, why have you fabricated a line saying I'm not invested? I already have. We've done this. You were proven wrong and didn't back down. It's in this forum history, in black and white. You can go back and find it.

And in the meantime, I'll go back and find where you told everyone it was a guaranteed win, just as you've suggested. You're a liar and a fantasist, and you always have been. You have no credibility whatsoever.

You can claim I don't either, but the difference is, I'm not claiming any as I've never pretend to know what will happen here - because no-one can. But you still do anyway when it's other people's hopes and money involved.

Shameful.

Your mistake is asking mikemike anything. Remember this is the poster who aggressively claimed last year that this is a guaranteed win for all CHL shareholders. And yet on Saturday he's posted:

"will ROI if having won be able to keep it a secret as.."

..thus proving, yet again, that he has no idea what he's talking about. Pure, unqualified speculation and he's in the dark just like the rest of us. We can only wait and see with no real idea what will happen.

Hi OF,

I'm offering you the opportunity to separate yourself from those individuals on here who are insistent on convincing everyone that they're delusional. Yes, you got swept up in it and made claims about whether I was a shareholder and what I bought in at - but we've now seen that making wild claims just because you're anonymous on the internet doesn't mean that they're going to be true. So perhaps you can help bring a little sense, calm and humility back to these boards.

And then it'll just be the very obvious individual who thinks he knows something that the markets don't about this stock being a guaranteed win (Newsflash: Share price *still* at 2.8p!). Whether you can accept that you were wrong about my intentions and motivations or not because they challenged your optimism, everyone should be able to agree that calling this stock a "no brainer" and guaranteeing "a fantastic outcome" is utter lunacy.

And yes, it's completely irresponsible too.

Hi again OF.

I don't think anyone can stop mikemike thinking it's still WWII and he's Dad's Army, but you and I can solve this pretty quickly:

- You can admit that you were wrong for claiming that I'm not a shareholder
- You can admit that you were wrong that I bought shares at 2.8p and am trying to protect them
- You can stop posting only buys that could easily be interpreted as ramping

I don't expect you to do the first two but if you keep doing the latter, then I'm going to call you out on it no matter what names you want to give it. Also be aware it wasn't even myself who first called what you're doing ramping, so maybe it's time to stop it and take (aha!) stock.

If you two were trying to convince everyone else here that you're reasonable, competent and trustworthy, you might want to ask LSE to add a delete button to these boards.

As it is, you're doing nothing to convince anyone that you're not just interested in posting blind optimism, nonsense and bile. Remember: It's still not my fault our stocks are in the dirt so don't take it out on me or anyone else.

p.s. OF - that's at least twice now that you've got your facts publicly wrong and that's just about me. First I didn't own any shares at all and now I bought them at 2.8p, eh?

https://i.imgur.com/2A8ShF8.jpg

This was a transfer in of stock first bought over five years ago. So that's twice you need to admit you've screwed up. If people here can't trust you two on claims like this, what *can* they trust you on? Nothing - especially when there's money at stake. Like many others here, I've lost several thousand on this so far and I'm presenting the facts here specifically so that you two don't cause further harm to anyone else.

Well, there we have it. At least you've both exposed yourselves fully now as being completely untrustworthy to anyone reading this board:

Orientfrance: Making up any possibility to fit the desired outcome.
mikemike: Excluding any possibility EXCEPT the desired outcome.

Those paying attention to what's actually happening in the real world will recognise that the case is being decided by the ICSID.. and not these two clowns. This stock is far from a "no brainer" and their analysis isn't worth the pixels they're printed on - DON'T put any more money in based on their ramping and blind optimism.

- Why are you accusing me of wanting the last word having just asked me a question?
- Why would you deny that I've got it right when all I've said is that we don't know what will happen - unless you do?
- How does exposing your reporting of positive news only qualify as deramping?
- Why would I deramp a share I've proven to own (despite your "giveaway" assessment)?

Not that you've acknowledged already having been proven wrong on that last one, of course ;)

Now, again - please stop ramping and we can clear this forum out for *genuine news* on the share only, to everyone's pleasure and benefit I'm sure.

Splitting hairs, OF. If you post your "observations" on a forum, you should absolutely expect reactions to them as well. That's why the link below each post says "Reply" and not "Fawn Over Because You Posted Good News".

Between yourself and MM, I thought you might be the one able to consider the other side of the equation if someone outside of our discussion were to show it to you. Now please, for everyone's benefit - stop ramping.

Supposed investor OF? Bzzzt! Ouch, bad luck guys:

https://i.imgur.com/BkdgRQx.jpg

And hilariously MM, you commend me for pointing out that we have no idea which way it'll go but then only go on to just talk about a positive outcome. What you'll note is that *nowhere* have I ever said we will lose this case. Ever. And yet you both violently knee-jerk against anyone who dares to talk about anything other than a win because it's the only thing you want to believe.

Remember guys - just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean the ROI and ICSID aren't out to get you.

Quite clearly untrue, based on unbiased, irrefutable historical fact - the share price *is* in the dirt, Churchill as a company is *not* in a strong position here and you only posting buys does not change that. Optimism or pessimism has nothing to do with this (and I'm actually usually a very positive person, just FYI).

My saying so is simply to disprove the distorted situation you and several others are trying to put forward. As I've said before, repeatedly, we have no way of knowing which way it'll go, good or bad. But past performance at least does not suggest the likelihood of the stunning victory that only looking at positives will deluding yourself into believing.

It's irresponsible. Some people may be in desperate financial situations and invest further in this company based on this misleading representation. I know that's possible because while I'm financially secure, I put more money in several years ago before I got wise to what was really happening on these boards.

So stop giving yourself and other people false hope, and just take it as it comes - unless you have some grounded evidence that these buys you're posting are for good reason.

"ROI must be wondering just how bad things can go."

You've literally just made this up because you want a good result. One of the requests were rejected and you decide that's "short shrift".

In reality it's nothing to do with optimism or pessimism. You seem to think that being presented with the facts hampers our chances for getting a good result. It literally makes no difference whatsoever and yet you insult anyone who challenges that.

The simple truth is that the only thing worth interpreting at this stage aside from *what actually happens* at the next hearing is what's happened so far.. and anyone honest with themselves will acknowledge it's been a disaster.

So count all the buys you like but our share price is still in the dirt. There's a slim chance that'll be changed at the next hearing and while we will ALL be happy if it does.. past performance says otherwise.

Yes. I'm wondering if, whether you realise it or not, you're only posting positive news, even if doing so doesn't necessarily reflect the reality of the situation.

OF: Are you able to offer any insight as to why you're only commenting on buys rather than sells?

Okay. So what's the latest share price?

Thanks for the link, much appreciated. And yes you were right on the share price - I'd read the latest bid on the NEX page. I stand corrected. Having read through the page, it sounds like there's a chance however there's one thing to bear in mind. This is written by the party which feels it's been wronged. They're challenging the ruling because it's all finished if they don't. It is *going* to sound like there's a chance. So I would, respectfully, amend your assessment to: "The tribunal appear to have broken their own rules, therefore an annulment would seem highly possible.. according to Churchill's take on the situation." We need to remember, even if it comes off for us, that Churchill are the ones on the backfoot here, even if just for now. So don't get your hopes up just yet - because we all know the history here.

I don't have a take on the latest news either way - I tried to find the link and was unsuccessful, so if you wouldn't mind sharing that'd be great. However, there have been many serious cases of either disappointment and/or confirmation bias on outcomes on this share in the past so that - as usual - is what I'd like to help couch everyone against. I notice the sp has dipped to 2 today from 2.2 as well, so it doesn't look like the markets share that confidence just yet (sadly.. it's my money in there too, after all).

Would you care to elaborate on what makes you think it's a strong case?

Maybe check the over-aggressiveness of your previous post first.

Yep, I did. "Edging up steadily" implies a trend. And merely a week after, that trend didn't work out. That's all I was saying and it's hard to argue with. Getting your hopes up won't push up the share price. Pure and simple.

*still come good Good weekends, all.