Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
@nano
I hope you're right but personally I think that's idealising things a little bit. This has never been about respect or we wouldn't have ever gotten here. This is cold, hard business. I know Samsung is an Asian company but I really don't think that will have much to do with it. Personally speaking.
Either way, just speculation so we'll see.
@FlyingHigher
You: "The BBC, Sky, Channel 4, ITV - it's all BS. Don't believe what they say."
Also You: "your comment about GB News says a lot about your naivety - That you would write off any view on a false perception you have of the platform they appear on."
GB News is a self-confessed right-wing hate vehicle. It's trying to monetise people like you who are especially prone to fear and turning that fear into hate. It's Fox News for the UK (or wants to be). GB News, The Daily Mail.. it all does the same thing. Everything's doom. It's always someone else's fault. There's always hate to be found where there could be hope.
You will say I can't engage with you on "facts." You will be wrong. I'm just not *going* to engage with you outright because you will not be persuaded. It is a waste of my time. Critical thinking does not apply to you because you are, again, cherry-picking to fit what you need to believe. You are convinced there is a conspiracy because you need there to be one. Because it fits your view that the world is skewed against you, and it's reassuring that frightening events have a single, pigeonholed explanation however preposterous that explanation might be in reality.
So once again, take your anti-vaxxing nonsense elsewhere. You've LOST. Rejoin the world of the real when or if you're able to.
@FH - whatever your opinions on this share, please take your anti-vaxxing nonsense elsewhere. You're paranoid about massive media organisations which have oversight and public scrutiny, yet you're willing to take the opinion of ONE cardiologist who's appeared on GB News (which is a red flag in itself) and whose opinions you're quoting were outed in a fact check as:
"[F]alse; experts say his research misleads on the risks of vaccination by cherry-picking evidence and relying on flawed studies, and public health authorities agree the benefits of the shots outweigh the risks."
Now again, please take your nonsense elsewhere and accept that the tin foil hat campaigners lost - you didn't save lives, the vaccines did.
@nanogeddon
The BBC has more oversight that any other media organisation in this country. Whatever their failings, they're a damn sight better that most else of anything we have and you only need to look to the US as proof of that. Even us having The S*n and various other tabloids is bad enough.
@Feeks
Hindsight is the cancer of share dealing. I'm experiencing it on a daily basis and have to rationalise that I made the decisions I did based on what I knew at the time, not what I know now. My financial situation could be very different if I had perfect knowledge, but none of us did or not - otherwise we'd be millionaires.
That's pointless, immature and entirely your right to do so. Well done for insulting a stranger without cause on the internet - you've really broken new ground there.
Everyone else can take note of the value of IT's posts going forward.
..that this result is causing tension, resulting in backbiting. While I don't believe that "staying strong" and "keeping the faith" will have any possible positive effect on the share price itself whatsoever, it isn't going to help us taking potshots at each other either. Difficult times for everyone, but we have in common that we're going through them together.
I'm hoping this situation works out well for all of us.
@crisplex
I'm sure that's not the only scenario. There's a wide range of investors here. Many are naturally worried given that this isn't the outcome many of us expected, even those who rightly predicated a settlement. Let's all be respectful wherever possible, and I'm reminding myself of that too to be clear. I'm worried about this and am as guilty as anyone.
@HH - Sadly, having owned a number of Samsung products in the past and been witness to some of their maneuvers, it's likely that they won't care in the slightest and will be more likely to be abrasive with you than conciliatory.
The Recommend button allows you to say you agree with a post without needing to make a separate post to say it.
Or if the "?" is referring to the question - you called Bass myopic earlier today, so I asked what that was based on.
@IT
My apologies, I wasn't necessarily insinuating that you'd made those £1-2 claims but you did say yesterday that you thought this board knew something the markets didn't. I'm not sure how that looks today.
Nevertheless, if you think Bass' view is myopic can you please explain why and what it's based on?
@IT
If you're going to say things like that, can you at least back it up with why? Following previous posts on this board, there were wild claims of £1-2 per share. We aren't seeing that today and real people's money is being affected here. We need to keep cool heads but also be realistic and base things on the best evidence we have - not wild hopes.
I see three possible scenarios here:
1) The share price *is* undervalued because those on here know it's a bargain and the market doesn't. People on here just know better than the markets do.
2 )The share price *is* undervalued because there's still a risk involved as to whether Nano will actually get a decent settlement. The market is holding off, just in case.
3) The share price is *not* undervalued because it's already baked in the fact that Nano will get a settlement.
Am I correct in that most people (including some louder voices) are sure it's #1?