Member Info for BlaimThrower

I'm here for what we all are. To discuss CTEA.

Why would they consult with CTEA? I don't understand why people seem to have CTEA as. company who are experts in their field. They are a 2 bit company with no proven track record. If they wanted expertise on blockchain they would go to someone like sovtech. They have clients like vodafone, nandos, deloitte and canon. CTEA don't even have the clients listed on their website anymore. Probably because most of them have ended their contracts (IMO)

Take a look at the NHS Covid-19 app and who worked on it.

"Accenture, Alan Turing Institute, NHS Digital, NHSx, Oxford University, VMware Pivotal Lab and Zuhlke Engineering. As the Government’s lead technical authority on cyber security, the National Cyber Security Centre has also supported in an advisory role."

These are all large companies who are probably considered experts in their field and have proven that they can operate a global business or they are subject matter experts from the finest education facilities this country has to offer. The government isn't going to be paying a company like CTEA for their opinion. IBM have a covid passport, don't they. Who would you go to? IBM or CTEA?

As for this being the bottom. The SP was 0.4p before they launched. Since then they have secured 0 contracts so for me this is not the bottom. If you factor in potential then maybe 1p. That's doubling the value before they created the app, so 0.6p for the possibility they might sign 1 or 2 small contracts. Currently, the company is valued 5x what it was before they took a few months to create a front end for their blockchain even though they have not managed to make any money off it in over a year. It's still very overvalued if you ask me.

I have never stated its anything other than my opinion that CTEA aren't involved with the NHS app. But bearing in mind that CTEA have previously RNS'd literally anything that could be interpreted as good news i think its fair to say they would have mentioned being involved with the NHS app. Also, they're not listed on any recently awarded government contract (small or large).

Those 2 facts pretty much guarantee they aren't involved in my opinion.

I think it's the latter MK. I can't see why any sensible investor would put more than £1k in this share unless it's someone like Alamo who just rides the waves of the constant pump and dumps in this share.

Oh yea, CTEA has great experience delivering to millions of users, don't they? I could see why they'd get asked to help the NHS who currently have an app that is used by millions and has been relatively seamless to use (IMO). A company with 3-5 members of staff with no demonstratable experience or operating at scale are not going to be asked to support a nationwide rollout (IMO)

"Posters have been saying that for weeks!

My consistent question which has been dodged everytime is how are they going to monetise the offering?

All apps are being offered for free as far as I can see."

Don't expect an answer to this Clive. CTEA have never mentioned it. Maybe this is because they wouldn't like investors knowing how little a cut they'd get seeing as they don't own the IP. This is if they ever actually make a sale.

Correct tuvok. In no way does the 30th March RNS suggest CTEA will be in any way involved with the NHS app. The Gov had an open invitation to every company and CTEA replied. How does that suggest CTEA are involved in the NHS app ste?

I meant to say re-post. Not report.

"And us holders will be laughing at the derampers this week."

I'll report this on Friday at 3:59pm

No, it wasn't. It was the same company but since they have changed their name. Do your research.

"the longer you hold the higher chance of profits on your investment"

That's a classic. Try telling that to anyone that invested in this company in 2003

You're right Natham. I'm sure there will be one of the following coming up soon which you'll no doubt see as a good thing

Another contract with no monetary value

Another trial that leads to nothing

A MOU signed somewhere in the third world with a company that has no office address listed and is using an almost identical website and app naming convention

Another Joint venture where you get 0% from sales of tests alone so you end up giving the app included package away for free to 1 badminton tournament

"CTEA's is fast and is simple."

Have you used the software have you? If not then how can you comment about how easy the software is to use?

Maybe the other user you secretly post under (HeatherH) on these boards has used it

If we got positive news on Jamacia I am almost certain it will shift north quickly. It seems lots of PI's love being sold the dream more then they do a good company making money. As Levi said though. Thats going to be the end of the year before we hear anything.

Is there a chance the lse website team can give us an option thats a lot stronger than a 'Strong Buy' that i can select when posting?

L_Graham86: You'd think that but don't be surprised if it didn't. The only thing that eventually got this over that 3p barries was a few large investors taking out a very large seller with a £3xxk purchase of their shares.

gkb: End of the year before we hear anything on Jamacia. This is based on what Brian has said in several interviews.

Inferior products? Which products are inferior and why?

Probably not.

is just another alias of richardjones. This is my favourite line from them

"I'm heavily invested and have been since 2019"

But they have only started posting since friday. Funny that isn't it?

He just jumps on whatever is top of the risers board then pumps until they can sell for a profit and move on. Just check their post history. The last time they (i say they as they post under a lot of ID'S) were on this board they lied and said CTEA had been offered £2 a share from apple as part of a takeover. They use militarytshirts and other handles on twitter too.

You're right. I should have stated the results being bad are just my opinion. It's based on the fact that they made a large loss last year and they have not signed a single paid contract since then. So it doesn't seem a fair assumption to me.