Member Info for bistolover

darby tries to kill off chance of any offers before the agm vote to ensure his bonuses "2017 Long Term Incentive Plan Award" are approved prior to offers being made. Remember the agm vote is the only way we can put pressure on the board to work for all shareholders, so use your vote to show what we think of the performance of OUR shares, vote down the resolutions.

nissin are in the business of selling manufactured goods, here nissin sells to pfd, so if nissin decides to not sell, then nissin lose opportunity to utilise spare capacity. in a co-pack deal both sides gain. nissin are not giving away the products for free to pfd.

again what technology is transferred to pfd. nissin makes a product in their factory and sells to pfd. this is co-pack, which happens all the time.

what technology. Nissin makes the super noodle pots in one of their factory, not in a PFD factory

two peas in a pod

well done AAT, every bit helps. reminder to others to vote as well. if enough vote, it will put pressure on darby to not ignore us investors.

interesting comments "These reviews are carried out in the ordinary course of business as part of the group's standard planning cycle and also on ad hoc bases, and may involve external advisors." so more signs darby is planning to give more shareholder funds to his friends in the city using the magic money tree, can see the debt build up further. We need to remove this clown before he does more damage

could it be Darby passing Rumors in the city to save his job.

just a reminder to everyone who has not voted as yet, and who feel the ceo darby had failed to deliver, then vote against the agm resolutions.

oasis are investors just like previous large investors who got badly burned. If they are getting close to being burnt, then they will ensure they take darby down with them. returns are not guaranteed with premier foods, very high risk with small potential upside.

why are you saying minimum 70p, do you know something others do not know. why not 40p, or even 30p. nobody knows what instructions they gave darby. bad news could go on for another 1-2 years, if darby can push it that far, then what will the price be, the debt is likely to be creeping back up to 530-540m by now.

this will only happen after darby has delivered the other 80% they do not own as cheaply as possible. Darby first target are the small holders as he has a personal dislike for this group i.e. he think if them as pests that do not deserve his time. another. His time is only reserved for the big holders, bond holders, bankers, advertising giants etc

There are 832.51m shares in issue, so 23.5m shares, so more like 2.82%

then a block of 23.5m shares ( 2.82%) would have attracted a considerable premium, especially if the buyer was nissin or oasis. Probably one of the holders moving to or from a total returns swap holding to another form.

Sales of ice-cream up 24%, but due to the effort of the clowns in the Board PFD will not benefit from this. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40412059

no problem doom, your more then welcome. I only wished every one listen even more, I did well to the bits I did listen to like waiting the last time until we got to 30p, unlike the poor darby lovers who put all their eggs into this and fell for the darby's magic formula lies. This board should give you a special honour, how does Sir Doom sound.

how could anyone say they were negative comments when they have turned out to be 100% right. comments made by darby can be considered considerably over exaggerated such like the £350m per week for the nhs

1. both lack understanding of what is required for the job 2. both cannot be trusted with our assets 3. both got the job without anyone else being considered 4. rather than showing themselves to be strong and stable, are actually weak and unstable 5. both lack ability to be able to communicate 6. both need to be replaced asap as their position is untenable 7. May can be kicked out whenever the cabinet wants to remove her, same with darby, the board can remove him easily, but need a hint from us via the agm voting. the main difference, May is trying her best to help the country, Darby is trying to his best to ruin the company for his own and vested groups interest. Please vote against the resolutions to show the board that we are not happy. Darby is a dead man working, board just need a sign to remove him. Just like the chancellor is likely to take over, in Darby's case the FD can takeover and ensure the objectives of reducing debt is met.

you could be right. they must get preferential over the large amount of bonds paying around 6.5%, this is 20% in three years. all darby had to do was use the cash generated to pay down the debt, the risks would have come down rapidly but he decided to create complex financial setups where at least 100m ( exluding the coupon payments) of shareholder funds were moved to his friends in the city. The debt is higher now then it was in dec 2013, 9 months after he started at premier Yet more debt was added from recent new bond issue, to replace existing bonds. why was this needed if £40m of debt was going to be paid off in a year through cash generation. All I can think he wants to increase the debt further, with 20% like for like profits down in his time at premier, what will the share price be like. we need to vote against him, it may not fully work, but will send a message to the new chairman, whoever he is, just hope darby is not planning to take on chairman role on as well.

although we each have small holdings, together this will add up to a large amount. each share has a vote and this needs to be used to give the board a message to say we the small holders cannot be ignored and kept in the dark, not be giving trash by Darby year after year. Darby is working for nissin only not for other shareholders interest. another year or 2 and nissin will be able to buy the remaining 80% for fraction of today's price. vote to remove darby