RE: Re:Poly over 300p5 Dec 2022 13:03
Right from the moment the troops went in, there was only one policy. Irrespective whether Ukraine fell in three days, three weeks or three years, the basic policy is Russia must not be allowed to gain or win. The sanctions, cutting off of gas or refusing to buy gas would all have followed through anyway. The energy market was spiraling out of control months before the invasion. A lot of the political unrest within Europe is connected to a rejection of the wider net zero policy, the impact of which has been made worse by the war - and an accumulation of EU diktats and the slow awakening of the loss of self determination whilst under Soviet EU control. Even if western governments are 'toppled', the fundamental policy of no appeasement will not change. The price to pay latter is just too great. This war impacts on European people and governments directly and therefore will be seen through. This is all about when Russia accepts this and then acts. Waiting with cash to 'jump in' is a folly, you will not recognize the signs fast enough and never buy quicker than the iis. If you are a pi you either take a position now or stay well behind the curve. There are risks, but safe to say Russia will fail economically a long time before the west. No BRICS are coming to Putin's aid economically not even China. They seem content to sit back and watch Russia fail. Hell, if Russia is to toxic for BRICS, then imagine the post war landscape. Russia is in perpetual decline on the battlefield and will not be able to hold on to the territories as has been demonstrated during favourable conditions. And the special sabotage opps within Russia are only just starting, with immediate and big impacts. How many new aircraft lost in just one week?