Member Info for big-blue

ahhh 660LT.... a "truth" teller. I've heard some bizarre attempts at taking the morale high ground in my time. But I don't think I have ever seen someone manage to get their own head so far up their own rse before.

And this is where the whole farce false to pieces for Russia. You presumed a certain state of mind, a certain ingrained communal prejudice, that we are as seen on our TV. What an error. Practically nothing in our media expresses who we are in the UK. We laugh at the political correct wokery. We will erase it from our airwaves in good time when we consider the joke over.

Meanwhile, you've started a war. End no and go back to your land or we will go in and there will be no more Russia left. You blew it. We'll end it.

Rebels in the ranks! There are many reports of orders not being followed, desertion and total disillusionment. You can only shoot so many of your own troops before you have an insurrection on your hands (a real one, not placard weaving beardies on a day trip). My money is on for an ending within weeks. The exact method is up for debate but there is very serious trouble in the ranks, military progress is practically nonexistent and the sanctions are hurting production at all levels. The rest of the world is also sizing up the secondary impact of sanctions on them.

I give it a couple of weeks.

I'm not Jesus! I have a different birth name and safely can not turn water into wine. If only.... :)

I haven't taken any side. I am an outside observer noting the state of things over there. It's why I would never invest in an American company. I am prepared to buy shares in two companies with significant Russian connections, Poly and POG. But I wouldn't touch any US connected country thanks to the deep division caused the wokies and liberal left behaving in an increasingly intolerant and autocratic fashion and holding everybody to ransom with over race or gender or liberties and freedoms.

............. and isn't 'snowflake' racially offensive to write people now?
Since the nickname for the black character in Love The Neighbour, Sambo, is deemed racially offensive, then nickname for the white character, Snowflake, should be deemed the same as offensive.

Quite typical of those calling out everybody else as the bigots when they themselves are de facto bigots.

actually offmessage I never said I think Trump won either of the elections! I don't read any newspaper, I have a global news feed from the entire spectrum. My observation is based on the difference in the response to allegations the Trump victory was a fraud against allegations the Biden victory was a fraud. Trump's had a never ending political and FBI detailed and very deep investigation. Biden's has had no formal investigation and all attempts to investigate have been blocked one way or another. That is not conspiracy theory. The voting laws were changed such that a number of people highlighted possible voter fraud opportunity upto 6 months before the last election. To favour which side? Again, where Biden gains in electoral votes no structured or formal investigation. Where Trump gains, formal investigation. All real world facts. Does the media treat the Biden voter fraud allegations the same as the Trump allegations? You answer that one for yourself. Unless parity in investigation standards are introduced, there will INEVITABLY be a civil war in the US. One half is just not going to stand by and let this stand.

Trump was a complete 'outsider' to Washington AND the Pentagon. Yes, the panic response to Trump throughout was visualised on the networks but elsewhere a lot of people would have been very concerned with him opening files and their liberty.

I am only an observer on the US. I found the hysterical reaction to Trump as candidate and the TV media declared horror and 24hr bullying to try and force the Republicans to not put him on the ticket quite extraordinary. It was many more times worse than trying to 'manage' the Bush election.

I was in the states, Vegas, just before I think the second debate between Trump and Clinton. The intensity of the media in outright opposition to Trump with reporters talking to camera, "we know Trump is watching is right now, we have been told. You are instructed to come down to the lobby Donald Trump and withdraw from race. You are to do this now, everybody is waiting for you." or very similar words. It was across all channels except Fox. It was relentless. I had to check I wasn't in North Korea. It is no wonder after such an anti and negative bombardment so many said his victory must have been fixed. Then four more years of the same negative media coverage and he went into the second election with an equal chance of winning again. Fo the left, covid provided the cover to change voting laws to allow stuffing of the ballot box and other electoral count rigging. Despite no formal investigation, private investigations are homing in on various events. Watch this space all will be revealed. The FBI have failed to remove some critical evidence about movements of people traced by mobile phone locations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fox news is NOT the issue. They are almost exclusively the only centre right voice left. In the US the outlets are more defined in a political stance but most of Fox is now having to take defensive positions from a never ending torrent of attacks. Fox does not parrot the narrative of the left or woke andis therefore defined as the rest as an enemy within to be eradicated. People in America perceive this and hence a serious polarisation has developed. A political 'wing' is no longer tolerated and is being eradicated. It is why there is so much hate due to Trump's election. The larger part of the media discovered they did not have control over people and how they vote. Hence all of Trump's time in office can best be described as 4 years of very deliberate negative coverage irrespective of what was said and done by most of the networks to force the vote against him in the second term. The vote had to be rigged to ensure he lost the second one and the campaign across media continues uniquely whatever the consequences, including civil war, to fiddle the democracy to only choose candidates the media deem acceptable [malleable through mass media to implement a left woke agenda].

I can see the civil war eventually erupting in the US. The insistence that mass media sets the narrative and the politicians simply act as the executive wing of media is causing major splits amongst a heavily armed population.

Active suppression of the voter fraud reporting n the last US election too. It is practically forbidden to raise the issue on mostUS news channels. Also not reported is the suppression o an attempt to investigate voter fraud allegations. Compare that to the never ending headline deep investigations from Polosie to the FBI over Trump's election win. The media narrative over fraud allegations between the two elections could not be more different.

Long night on the Xaxxon help desk is it?

You will note amongst a lot of politician comments and retired military talking heads that the psychological line of provoking a nuclear exchange has been crossed. It does sound like a nuclear attack is expected irrespective of what the west or nato does or says. The authoritarian Russia has dictated a course of action and response to the west and, because they are back to soviet mind set, they can not contemplate non-compliance.

The interception systems for ballistic missiles are being rapidly expanded. The decision to respond with like for like nuclear yields and target election will already have been made.

If that escalated from a few tactical exchanges, Russia is guaranteed to be turned to dust with recoverable losses in the west. Russia will be so decimated there will be no rebuilding, but the west will be able to. Either Russia concentrates warheads in one place for maximum irrecoverable damage or as to dilute the impact over many targets. Concentrate on one area, mot if not all missiles and delivery systems will be erased.

And then there is the decrepit state o the decayed rusting Russian nukes. Why do you think the invasion made straight for the nuclear plants? They were looking for fissile material components. I bet the extent of decay of Russia's battlefield nukes is so bad there is a very low probability ANY would go critical and they are currently trying to cannibalise a few to actually use thinking they will scare of the west.

Russia will be nuked in response by standing order. It is a guarantee and anticipated.

So if the boot was on the other foot and Ukraine had annexed Krasanodar or Rotov-on-Don you are saying the Russians should simply have moved back and redrawn their border east of the towns?

Of course not. So the terrorists in attempting to take Ukraine territory backed up by Russia were legitimate targets. Why were the separatists armed to the teeth with tanks? What kind of peace process is tat?

You are all ust peeved because the Ukrainians stood their ground and now have open up in a full military stance and are kicking ten tonnes out of the clowns and the Russian army circus. Get used to it because it will be nato forces next and Russia will be deleted from the UN and every institution going.

If all that chart reading works so well, why aren't all chartists millionaires?

Are there any not on the list?

One issue is some poster don't get any response to their comments. So they retaliate by filtering believing all the green boxes indicate somebody is commenting on them. It is a personality disorder,

Pete460 would like to invite you all into his bubble. That way he has control over you. By getting yo to filter out various opinions, you are left with only what he wants you to hear. You are now controlled.

Does he work for twitter, or google perchance? Makes you think. Why would somebody encourage you to filter someone, or indeed such a large number of people.

If he asks you for money............

"that free speech was stated by you as being unacceptable to you"

What did I say was unacceptable?

If somebody was to post some fourier analysis related to high low frequency movements against things like interest rate, workforce numbers, then you can impress me. But that is a bit more involved than the very basic least squares fit I keep being posted. Even a polynomial regression can suddenly flip the axis proving it is all about start/end point selection and degrees of freedom YOU chose.

0.04% is CO2, a trace gas. Show any proofed equation that shows how even doubling that could lead to any observable change in a planet's temperature and you may even ignore accelerated plant growth with higher CO2.

Still waiting - and this 100% Poly related because industries are paying ever more billions to mitigate carbon on the basis of cc claims. Happy for your future divvies to be halved then quartered in order to pay for the carbon capture scheme? Or perhaps some independent scrutiny of the claims to see whether sucking CO2 out of the atmosphere is needed or indeed potentially catastrophic to plant life and by the food chain all landlife on earth. It is a very real argument that is completely suppressed.

I think charts is mumbo jumbo hocus pocus Tarot card reading.

But I wouldn't click the report button. I would caution about paying subscriptions for the random lines to those who maybe fooled into thinking the folly has any use.

I can't wind the key any further without breaking the spring. No doubt I will now be labeled as a Saville anti-immigrant Brexit Farage Murdoch lover. Did I leave out any of today's insults thrown at me?

"May as well leave the board to blue..."

The final deletion. Actually, all you end up doing is sweeping al the deleted together in one place.