Member Info for Bfdinvestor

I actually don't mind some of what Investace says, although his analysis is far from Ace. Firstly, EUA is now capitalised far beyond 2025, so admin isn't really a worry for the foreseeable.

Secondly I'm not so certain about 3p, a whiff of good news will take it beyond that easily.

Where I agree tho is that we are now definitely in an end game.

Spiky well done on ticking threemore troll boxes tonight

1. Somebody gives you an answer you don't like, you seek to disparage it.

2. Somebody challenges you, you claim they are being aggressive or overly emotional. Well check your volume of posts here compared to mine lol

3. You invited posters who challenge you to filter you, the end result being you get to post your untruths unchallenged

It's straight from troll 101 spikeyj, must do better!

Lots of proactive management going on here too Jeremy

Sadly it just doesn't extend to comms

Spikeyj do you genuinely believe that what you post is polite, on topic and company focussed?

If that is the case, can you explain how your insinuation that EUA was trading whilst insolvent met those criteria. Equally can you confirm the basis for your statement that Monchetundra is a low quality asset, when professional opinion states the opposite.

Perhaps you think posting that kind of stuff is amusing?

Its a shame you didn't learn anything from your ban spikey.

I'm actually surprised they let you still post the way you do.

If you ever do post anything remotely amusing/interesting/truthful it would be good to see

Spikeyj anybody can short with a cfd

I see you avoided the question per usual.

It's what I find on most boards, the uninvested have very little interest in an actual debate, it's all just about spouting their negativity

Ratio of buys to sells was 2 to 1.

Congratulations must go to the market makers for lining their own pockets. That's what today was always going to be about.

I'd guess the key thing is to focus on the end game not the dodgy games.

The number of new troll user ID's created today speaks volumes

Why are you bothering?

It's kind of pointless

You don't know if other forms of finance would have been available

You don't know if other collateral was discussed

You don't know if they could have found other ways to sell some of the product

You talked on another thread about investors and traders. There is one category you didn't mention which is shorter. Is that what you are, it seems the only explanation for your constant stream of negativity

I'm not expecting any mining any time soon.

I think whoever the JV partner is will look to increase the resource before mining.

Oh dear it seems the uninvested are really scraping the bottom of the barrel now

norm that's why han**** is so important. if it delivers we should gain more credibility for the other assets. which should help the market cap.

two things concern me atm.

1. if charles archer is being paid by ufo he should not be releasing that kind of tweet

2. as soon as the sp gains momentum the spread widens rapidly.

mms may well try to line their own pockets rather than make a market

Norm but that assumes all the other assets are worthless

With a management team that proves itself that certainly isn't the case.

As I've said, I totally agree that tuppence is currently nonsensical

Forgot to say, 2p on JV news is more than a little silly.

Market Cap ofn30-40m is probably more realistic for now

norm not sure how you can say han**** is priced into a £10m market cap?

what's more important to me atm is that, if they do deliver this month, then it begins to show that just maybe this leadership group are different. this, in itself would go a long way to helping rebuild the sp

Probably worth pointing out that the presentation also assumes c2000 dollars price per tonne achieved, which seems optimistic at the moment

Interesting and a little worrying to hear Charles Archer saying anything under 5.8p would be great value.

Let's hope this isn't the case

And there you go again Kat, the person trumpeting the possibility of a Friday RNS was .....you

Personally, I don't want a non exec to have an overly big shareholding, it can cloud their judgement

Kat the person who referred to Wellesley most was.....you!

Ofcourse Bill, more likely you realised the maths didn't work.

Well done the moderators, quick work getting rid of daisy!