Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Spiky I have zero interest in trawling back through your plethora of posts.

It seems you have gone into overdrive to try to find new negatives now that your previous ones have been proven false

Truthful and you don't really sit comfortably together tho Spiky.

By your definition (and it's your definition we are talking about here), the sand is worthless, the other assets are too low grade to sell, yet Sanderson will have done a risk assessment and be fine to get their money back in a default scenario. A default scenario you implied already existed but doesn't

Amazing you can't see the contradictions in what you post or maybe you are so arrogant you don't care that others will see through them

Now maybe you could confirm the total quantum of the loan facility not just the part you chose to mention?

Wow spiky after having got everything wrong it's amazing you are still ploughing on with this complete garbage.

You maintain that EUA assets are virtually worthless yet you now post that Sanderson have limited risk as they would rank higher in a default scenario if those supposedly worthless assets were sold

It's hard to understand whether you are ridiculously arrogant or just plain daft. Maybe both.

Atleast you have stopped peddling the nonsense that there is a £2.5m loan facility at 2.5p, so I suppose we should be grateful for small mercies

Awww bon Scott still living in your fantasy world of anger and rage.

How much of a loss did the Daily Mail make? Do they constantly refer to themselves as "struggling".

Anyway, returning to the topic, it's good to see ASOS following where Boo led again.

Paid for returns is rapidly becoming an industry standard, in a couple of years it won't even be a thing

Nobody knows for sure is the honest answer bobrad.

All that can be said at the moment is that there is no reason that the suspension shouldn't be lifted on Monday.

What isn't true is all the troll garbage that has been posted here in the last few weeks

So let's recap

EUA hasn't been trading whilst insolvent.

The accounts have been signed off

The product stored at WK isn't worthless.

Monchetundra and NKT aren't poor grade

Imagine how the trolls must feel wasting weeks of their lives just to be proven wrong

Oh, and a final one, one of the idiots was posting last night that EUA has signed a £1.5m loan facility convertible at 2.5p. They haven't.

That is how silly the trolls are now becoming

Interesting to see ASOS have started charging for returns, to a subset of customers. Equally strange that the Daily Mail always needs to start with "struggling" every time they write about ASOS or Boo

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13823145/Struggling-fast-fashion-brand-Asos-start-charging-customers-return-clothes-footsteps-Zara-Boohoo.html

Wow quarter past twelve on a Friday night Spidey.

Living your best life

So sad

Investace I'm taking your advice.

Not really, I was going out for a couple anyway

Happy Friday all invested.

Trolls not so much

Who knows oldpsursfan. But whatever the reason is, he has done it.

Would any of us have done the same?

It shows commitment, integrity and hopefully a belief that he will make money.

I'm not his biggest fan btw, but he has definitely stood up and been counted today

Officecat...purrfect

GLG2

Must stand for Gecko Looks Gormless again

I wonder if spiky will fall off his lilo

All of you idiot trolls who have been slating Christian constantly should be ashamed of yourselves

Talk about putting your money where your mouth is.

Not that any of you have any money here

This is a whole new definition of single market!

And just who is pumping this Kat

What I see by and large in reasoned debate, with a couple of exceptions

Hexam, I understand exactly what you are saying, I just don't agree with it.

I think we can all guess who the others you are referring to are!

Ofcourse Hexam, surely you see how silly that sounds.

He has paid £130m into a business that is a purely online fashion business that trades almost exclusively via ASOS platform.

What do you think Debenhams is worth currently with it's own architecture and customer base

Thanks for sharing Hexam, however it's our appear that the billionaire who has bought into Topshop doesn't share your methodology.

It makes it more likely that Boo will do something similar with Debenhams, albeit for a minority stake.

I'd agree that there were several reasons for ASOS rise yesterday and the bond thing was important. Perhaps that is a route that Boo are exploring too.

Ian personally I didn't see any daft ramping yesterday.

I'm not a fan of it either, it happened here a couple of months ago and those posters vanished.

Most of the posters here are long termers.

Although I don't like ramping, I equally dislike pointless trolling which happens here far more often

Care to explain your point Hexam?