Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Dip that's a really interesting post.

It's the first time any of the.rock star board, with the exception of Shaun Day, have bought any shares, so they are certainly looking at it as a new investment!

How high do you think the market cap can go. Using Northern star as a reference, they have something like £2.5bn revenue and £8.8bn market cap.

With 13.3bn shares in issue, we would need an sp of 66p to hit their market cap, yet it is hard to see how we hit their scale.

To reiterate, despite what some may say, I'm positive about Ggp, I believe a good return is still achievable and this is therefore highly investable

"Planned to create a top 5 ASX owned gold mine"

Napthman that is the exact quote from the presentation referencing Havieron.

It may not worry you guys but it concerns me

Trippytaka, it looks like you are the one who is unable to have a debate

You are correct nobody can know where the sp will go. That is why I used the word "probably"

Any sp approaching 40p is the best part of a ten bagger from here so it's not a deramp of any sort

Unless you believe the 88p nonsense ofcourse.

I've held here for years, I bought more shares in the retail offer which I have no intention of selling. So it's unclear to me why you would accuse anybody of being a deramper, subtle or otherwise, just because they don't think Day is the bee's knees or they don't have a genuine worry that he will revert to type.

Chat boards are meant for genuine debate, opportunity and risk, it's how good investing should work

Good points starbright.

It's been clear for ages that Day doesn't give a toss about Pi's.

Whilst the deal is undoubtedly a good one in whole, it's less good for LTH, the max sp we will probably see in the foreseeable is in the 40s unless we hit big at another target.

My worry now is the presentation references greatland being ASX owned. I hope the cross listing is just that and not another funding exercise.

When is the TH, personally I'd love to ask him a couple of questions

So Bon Scott let's summate what you are saying.

You went on a website to find an archive that somebody else had saved from a period when you supposedly weren't here to find posts from somebody who no longer exists, just so you could post it here to try to pick one of your endless arguments. And a poster who isn't me anyway.

Do you realise how stupid that is and what a waste of time.

Maybe you should think about how your life aims.

It seems this Tradey is rattling around in your head in a very unhealthy way

Bon Scott

It's strange you didn't respond yesterday to my question asking how you could possibly post something from 2022, from a poster whose content doesn't exist, despite you not being here in 2022 apparently

It is strange how you and Spidey apparently can discuss stuff from years ago despite apparently not being here.

Same user, repeat offenders or multi multiple accounts?

Do you have any other explanation?

Di minimis first, then the rest of the business model hopefully

The one that uses children, slave labour, proscribed cotton and poisonous materials.

Amazing anybody wants Boo to fail so badly that they will support these business practices

Spidey, the processes are already in place

It's an absolute doddle

They prescribe by business or country of origin

Now we know it doesn't fit your trolling agenda, but it's likely going to happen.

Spidey why not actually read something for a change

Firstly Boo doesn't use di minimis

Secondly US legislation is being specially targeted at China.

Thirdly EU legislation is most probably going to be based on the amount of new products sold, which once again will only target the Chinese.

How many user ID's have you used over the years to gain your supposed historic knowledge?

Those Spidey skills to the fore again

The member for less than a year talking about the last four years again.

Maybe all the trolls are the same person, who knows

Still no answer Spidey

It's just what trolls do

Strange how you and bon Scott have this supposed full history of this board for years when you werent members.

One and the same potentially?

I'm more interested in this Spidey and how bon Scott can access vanished posts from 2022.

What could the answer be

I'm more interested in how you apparently know what people were saying four years ago when you joined less than a year ago "

Interesting the RNS on the 5th said they were at customs.

It's only a couple of hundred miles to Bougouni, so I hope they haven't done a detour like the boat!

I hope they haven't

Thanks Bamps

Asllan if they are doing 10mph on those roads I'd be amazed

Depends how quick they got through customs, but it should only be a few days

Thanks bamps

So it looks like you think there is atleast enough ore at Telfer to keep generating money until after Hav comes online and probably after?

I guess it's like any major project where there are constrained resources, you go for low hanging and cash generating fruit first

Ggp may be good but it is still a relatively small company so focus is good.

Do you have any idea why there is so long between first ore and first gold?

The presentation is very interesting and tells a good story.

From a risk perspective, one obvious question stands out, perhaps someone like Bamps or Dip could answer.

The project plan shows first ore H2 26 yet first gold H227?

This seems like a long time to wait.

Per current plan Telfer has an 18 month life span which hopefully can be extended, but we have a potential risk of a significant period without revenue. Hopefully the RCF is in place to cover this risk?

HD IT's how these things usually work, it's why i put in for a relatively small amount as these are usually allocated in full. It's the big requests that get scaled back.

Now if they had done a prospectus and made a decent allocation.......

It surprised me that the first partnership in the US was nastygal and not a brand, so thought i'd do a little digging and it's quite interesting

Nastygal.com 1.15m webisite views in August, an increase of 6%. 75% come from the US and this figure was up 12% in August.

Nastygal.co.uk 157k views in August, down c3%

US.boohoo.com 1.39m views in August, down 8%. 80% of views come from the US and were down 6.9% in August

So it would look like maybe Nastygal is a better brand than I thought in the US and there may be some legs in this new strategy

Even stranger Bon Scott

you joined in September 2023.

Yet you have a post from 2022 for a poster who doesn't exist and a search against member name returns nothing.

Perhaps you trolls are all the same person after all

How else would you explain it?