Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Bon Scott reported again

The EBT buys shares on the open market.

It currently holds a significant proportion of the company share capital, so there is no dilution

Arthur if you post lies, people may decide you are a troll.

Following the placing in April 24, there was no subsequent RNS until July. I'm sure you can do the maths!

Southcoast, atleast read the RNS. There is no dilution

The Awards will be satisfied by the Company's Employee Benefit Trust and there is no dilutive impact on shareholders.

Actually Spidey plenty of evidence

Just look at the timing of the trades and the trade types

Can only be shorters.

Why are you here?

1am in the morning and back on it at breakfast, all where you have no investment and the only board you post on.

It's not normal is it?

Wow Arthur, no news for a whole month. Are you an investor or a goldfish

Bon Scott do you think Finley has done a bad job with Debenhams then, because that is what some of his shares are for.

As for the rest, it seems a stupid amount of shares for both Finlay and Morana and should have come with a lock in period atleast.

The acid test is do they sell any. It's interesting that, knowing he would get free shares, Finlay still went and bought on the open market

Di minimis

Reardon check the trades, or lack of them, it's just shorters responding to the dominos stuff

Imagine posting at 1am in the morning and being back on it at breakfast time on a share where you have no investment.

Imagine never explaining why you do it, all the time denying that you are shorting or paid to do it.

It must be some life

Boo doesn't use di minimis in the US and tariffs have only been introduced for goods from China, Canada and Mexico.

So there is no impact on Boo.

Strange that an angry troll would have such a dull life that he posts where he has no investment at nearly1sm

Absolutely massive news

Thats their business model destroyed in the US.

I wonder when EU will follow

Not at all southcoast

I'm merely putting a different perspective to the 99% of largely ill informed rubbish that makes up this board.

Talking of which, have you worked out why PLT's revenue seemed to drop so much yet lol?

Yes southcoast nobody debates the index Boo sits in. However the scale of the business is FTSE 250 size, so that is how total remuneration should be judged.

As previously, the average income for a CEO is over £1.7m

So once again you seem to be barking up the wrong tree.

The purpose of these boards is supposedly for investors and potential investors to discuss business related stuff. Somehow can that be time wasting

It's a shame the mods don't stamp down on the uninvested trolls who just abuse, goad and try to disrupt any actual debate. They are genuinely wasting their lives. Unless they are paid to do it or shorting ofcourse

The scale of the business is equivalent to the 250.

I didn't mention salary either. Income isn't salary

Average income is north of £1.7m

Southcoast, what do you think is the average annual income for a ftse 250 CEO

You mean the reality of you uninvested trolls wasting your lives posting where you have no investment and even less knowledge

Why would anybody be here at a weekend without any interest. What a boring life

No loss making company is in control of its own destiny

What a load of crap Wyndrum

How many years was Tesla loss making for?

The auditors will take a simple view. Avacta has been able to raise before it necessary, so it will be able to do so again.

That is just how auditor's work.

This whole thread is just pointless rubbish

10% is more than Sheins profit margin

Reardon, he's probably on a 6 month notice period.

I genuinely hope he isn't giving any advice, he's done enough damage already

what you need to do southcoast is stop embarrassing yourself by posting misinformation.

so you have moved from ****ging off plt to talking about overall us revenue.

is that because you don't have the basic integrity to admit the bs you were talking about plt?

you are now providing the same false comparators about debenhams. maybe go and have a proper look at those accounts and work out the reasons for the changes you post about in isolation. for instance, why do you think debenhams no longer includes any rest of the world revenue?