Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Arthur let's look at the one doc you have posted

It states listing could happen in a month.

It states listing usually takes BETWEEN 6-12 MONTHS

So why have you chosen to post the absolute worst case scenario

Maybe produce a few of these sites then Arthur, for companies posting on the relevant NASDAQ exchange, assuming you even know the one we are likely to list on.

But before you do that, go and read the NASDAQ docs, which state approval is usually 4-6 weeks but CAN BE CONSIDERABLY QUICKER.

Then maybe you should consider why you are posing fud hidden as a question to someone you believe has filtered you

But be

And there you go again with your opinions Arthur

Go and read the RNS, the exchange admittance docs and you may appear not so clueless

You see Arthur that's a classic example of why your opinions count for nothing when you could have looked as Gs20 growing volumes over the last year

Because he is probably adding it on to his existing responsibilities. His post doesn't say he is giving up anything.

Keep trying to spread fud Arthur

"The spikes are just as engineered as the falls"

No Kat, they aren't, the rises have been on the back of solid news and have been driven by massive volume. Neither of those things are happening here, but the infestation of the board is. 1m share trades aren't massive and they are the exception, there are far more smaller ones. Looking at yesterday's trades, they came in bursts, which weren't coincidental imo.

Interesting post from @capitalpmh on X. I have no doubt the same is happening here, hence the appearance of the likes of Arthur and the appropriately named Fat rat. A similar thing happened when the interims came out and we know what happend after that!

What out, what out there's a 'tree shaker' about.

Indeed due to AIM's low liquidity, it appears the prices of many smallcap stocks are currently being manipulated by traders - who continuously sell very small packets (ie

As if my magic, all three of the uninvsted trolls appear to try and shout down an interesting thread

Too thick to realise that they just prove the point

Piemaker that's patently not true in the short term

Why do you think shorts and traders group together and flood these boards.

Look at winnifrith and his MO

That's the problem Arthur you rely on your opinion rather than actually researching any facts.

As I've pointed out several times, your opinions are often wrong

It's quite obvious why you are here

Totally correct Alex, sadly it's been happening for years

Ably supported by posters on these boards spreading lies and misinformation, as can be sen by this board this morning

Hexam 1 in a million is obviously just a saying.

Strange how you never comment on the posts stating admin is a certainty

If you think my valuation or Debenhams, which is significantly lower than the CEO's, is way over the top, then what do you think it is worth

Swervington, some may have done, I certainly didn't, and said so at the time. In a business context, three weeks is nothing anyway

Hopefully an RNS tomorrow to stop the drop or looking likely for another week minimum.

Don't you think that post of yours is deramping either Arthur?

Or does your crystal ball tell you where the sp will this time next week?

What news was expected within three weeks Arthur, I wasn't expecting any, do you have some form of crystal ball?

The only people saying news would come urgently were a couple of people on this board. Do you take that as genuine research or knowledge? The BoD certainly didn't say anything of the sort.

Wrt the sp tanking, it depends on your perspective. 50% down in a month or 192% up in 6 months. You only seem to focus on the next hour or day so I presume you are some form of trader not an investor. Nothing wrong with that btw, but why pretend to be something you aren't

Arthur, for the avoidance of doubt and just like most of your posts, it is absolutely deramping.

You are fooling nobody

Southcoast, as usual you are telling half a story. You forget to say that in FY 2018, before it's FIRST administration Debenhams lost nearly £0.5bn.

So it's model was basically done before COVID finally killed it.

Boo paid £55m basically for the brand name and a customer list. It built the website and environment itself.

As a profitable growing business what do you think it is worth. The CEO thinks it is worth more than the market cap of the entire group. I think that is excessive but not by overly much.

It would be interesting to see what you and the likes of Hexam actually think it is worth?

This link may help you understand the Debenhams story properly

https://www.cityam.com/debenhams-closure-timeline-of-department-store-chains-collapse/

If you genuinely believe there is no hope southcoast, then surely the first rule of investing should kick in?

Your theory imo is way wide of the mark.

Frasers are here purely and simply for Debenhams because they know the massive value within that business.

As posted earlier a partial sale of Debenhams pays off the RCF and leaves tens of millions in the bank.

So why keep banging on about a highly unlikely admin scenario

In the one in a million chances that happened, do you really believe any administrator would sell the assets cheap.

Lol

Atleast one has a bit of business acumen

Why do you think Frasers are her