Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Quite possibly LD

But it does seem strange that so many uninvested converge on this board, add nothing, and just seek to argue and insult.

Even in the early hours, it's more than a little strange

Fed ever since I first invested here group 2 has been massively bigger than group 1.

It does seem strange that this board attracts them like no other. Even posters like Pedro and daytrade, who were banned from the original boo board have reappeared. Mercifully they look far better from behind a green box.

I guess it's similar to how some are drawn to car crashes in a ghoulish way

It is hard to trust management here, the previous CEO should have gone atleast a year before he did. How he could ever sign off on a US warehouse which only carried just over half the product lines is beyond me.

Atleast we now have a CEO who has grown up in online and appears to be getting stuff done.

Very high risk here but also very high returns if Finlay delivers

Keep up with the faux rage bon Scott, it's amusing

What nobody is interested in is the the fixation that you and the other trolls have with this mythical tradey figure. It's rather worrying. Why would anybody be so fixated in the early hours of the morning. It smacks of a very sad life.

Not every comment is directed at you bon scott, although given that you display such strong narcissistic tendencies it's understandable why you think that way.

Id suggest that you actually go and read some RNS. It's what real investors are supposed to do after all. If you did you would know that the strategic review is still ongoing and an update will be provided in the full year results. Hence no CM day.

Now a valid question is, why is it taking so long, in my mind it should be done by now. So let's hope they have some solid news in the next few weeks.

Now I know why I don't filter you like the other trolls bon Scott

The comedy value is too high

What is it about these trolls and early hours ranting?

What I have posted is straight from the company RNS Bon Scott. If you actually read some you would know that. So it is the business plan not mine.

But why would you do that, you are only here to post angry nonsense.

If you aren't happy maybe southcoast could pass on Mahmud's number to you and you could give him a call.

Or maybe you could consider selling those supposed shares. After supposedly averaging down you must have a really low average lol

So the published strategy at the top level was

1. Right size the business

2. Take out unnecessary cost and reduce debt

3. Focus on five brands

4. Roll out market place model

5. Focus on ESG

Let's look at a few of the "hints' bon Scott

More than £100m taken out of opex

Two warehouses sub let

Soho office sold

Market places rolled out. I don't suppose you have even looked on Boohoo brands as you'd rather read Invezz who think Boo are in the FTSE 250

PLT rebranded

New ESG partner appointed.

Equity fund raise completed and majority of debt repaid

I would have thought that as a supposed investor,who has supposedly averaged down, you would understand some of these basics

Southcoast you are beginning to sound almost as daft as bon Scott.

The numbers have been showing for a couple of years that youth brands have been struggling. They have also shown us that Debenhams and, to a degree, Karen Millen aren't.

I certainly haven't been saying anything like you imply.

To say there is no plan is plain stupid, when the elements of the plan have been communicated and large parts of them delivered.

I don't know what the PLt research said or how well the market place approach will be taken up by existing customers. That's why I keep saying I don't know how credible the plan is

Finlay, however, does have a very good online CV and a quick scan shows that Boohoo.com already has a fantastic range of brands on it.

It's high risk but potentially very high reward

It's been obvious that PLT, with the biggest US presence, was probably struggling the most.

Foxy troll

Ofcourse you have, strange you have never mentioned GGP before.

With your 100% track record of getting this wrong, what could I have possibly learned from you?

What happened to the 30m shares you were going to offload.

It's lucky that nobody here takes a word you say seriously

Lil foxy troll

It's so funny to see you mess up

Bernard joined kod I'm 2016. Havieron, Greatland's flagship discovered was being explored not long after.

Bouguni is in production, Havieron is still probably 3-5 years away.

As for Daz, ondoubt if he is a mate of yours and I doubt if he has doubled his money yet. I've far more than doubled my money in GGP, as I have here, and more than happy to remain in both.

Maybe you should buy some shares on one or the other

Exactly, what they have is a direction of travel what they are trying to come up with is a strategic plan.

Incorrect Hexam

What they have is a business plan which has been communicated several times.

What they leave yet to communicate is an asset strategy for non core brands assets.

Southcoast I'll leave the making up stuff to you

Maybe you should go and count how many times extension of the market place model has been mentioned in RNS.

Not sure what you mean by a complete u turn on PLT? They have evolved the brand but it's not a I turn by any stretch of the imagination. If something wasn't working, would you rather they had done nothing?

Good to see lil ole foxy troll getting it 100% wrong again.

We are literally years away from being a gold miner.

There will be growing value in the gold assets as we explore them, but it is Bougouni which was always going to give us near term cash and time to do other things. Bougouni will also grow massively

Why the comparison with Ggp. I have an investment there and they have bought a producing mine, so the comparison is totally spurious

The guy clearly has no investment as he understands nothing

Lol I'd be disappointed if it was otherwise

Not at all Hexam because I see them as two separate things.

1. The three year strategy for the five core brands.

2. The strategic review to digest non core brands

So there is no contradiction to me although I'm sure you will disagree

Strange you never mentioned averaging down before Bon Scott.

Nobody who posts in the way you do would ever have averaged down.

The shorts who are in now aren't the same shorts who were in a couple of years ago.

Finlay has sign posted his strategy. Up to you if you believe in it or not.

They also stated that the strategic review is still ongoing

However what isn't in dispute is the amount of change he has carried out since becoming CEO.

It remains to be seen if it the strategy works, but if it does the sp should be multiples of where it is now.

If it doesn't, the brands have been valued at £800m, so nearly three times the current market cap.

It's undoubtedly high risk Vs very high return atm

Arb is nowhere near as toxic as this board Hexam.

My comment relates to posts not posters.

Just look at today for the level of lies invective and insults from the negative contingent here.

It's kind of pointless stating who holds shares. For instance atleast two of the worst trolls claim to hold them

Luckily I've filtered one of them and would filter the other if I didn't find him mildly amusing

Lil ole foxy troll has finally said something that makes a little sense

Unsurprisingly it's not about Kodal

Fed I don't think it is a case of who is the better retailer. It's more a question of who is the better online retailer.

Ashley has no online track record. His last foray into online with Missguided was a total disaster and ended with it being sold to Shein.

Finlay has a fantastic online CV but this is his first CEO role.

It's worth noting that Ashley hasn't made a single positive suggestion since building his shareholding, nor has he nominated a board director as promised.

Maybe he has faith in Finley. After all, he promoted someone a lot younger with a lot less experience at sports direct

I doubt it anyone is still holding from £4 LD.

If you think what Spidey posts in the early hours, for instance, is realism then you must be smoking something

Name a board which is worse Hexam. Then look at the percentage of negative posts here. It's not just about the posters it's about the volume of posts by the trolls.

Totally agree about the number of silly posts, shame you ignore most of them and then add to them

That is the troll blindness I guess

Which other board has to put up with

80%, it's more like over 90%.

This is the only board on LSE that is totally dominated by shorts/trolls