Member Info for Bfdinvestor

I'd guess the rea idiots are people who keep posting on a Baird where they have no investment bon Scott. Or Nate D. Or Dc2007

So Goldman Sachs have lowered their target to a price that is higher than the current sp

Well MM's don't want anyone buying ATM, talking the you know what again!

Maybe the new faces hold shares, unlike you!

Why would they hold the results for a loss number that wasn't going to change

The AoA were updated back in July which means that the finance deal was done then.

Shame the holiday isn't getting any better

I guess it also depends how far down the line a PLT sale really is.

I doubt they would have done the accounts in the way that they have on a whim and maybe.

All that time to mull over things Simon yet you still can't get the basics right, let alone anything else.

Given that you don't own any shares, why bother?

Just to pick up a couple of things, because frankly it isn't worth any more of my time.

1. Auditors audit, they don't make up frilly stories

2. The results were far more likely held back due to PLT than the loan facility.

3. Plt isn't loss making now. Top Shop, with tiny revenue, no IT architecture and very limited customer IP is valued at £180m. PLT also wasnt just bought from the Kamani family, the valuation was agreed by KPMG AND Mahmud Kamani wasn't involved in the sale process.

4. I presume you are referring to Frasers as the cheaper finance? As far as we know, frasers only offered £125m and we have no indication of what terms and conditions may have applied. What we do know is Ashley only ever looks after Ashley. And whilst the terms aren't particularly cheap on the £175m RCF, they aren't massively expensive either.

5. I don't think many people other than the trolls on here would call 34% growth modest. Especially when it is offset by falling sales in the labels. Market place growth will be far higher 34%.

I could go on but you really aren't worth the time

There is a clear difference between something negative and deliberate lying nonsense and gibberish

Personally i dont believe in filtering because deliberate lies and spamming should be reported and hopefully admin do the right thing

I'm reporting all the lies from chef and joebloggs i hope others do the same

I hope he really has blocked me

His alter ego won't have lol

When did they ever hold it at to Boohoo office?

I'd expect notice of AGM to be contained in the header section of the RNS. It wasn't

Just another example of garbage Comms I guess

When did I ever say I had a personal broker?

I use HL for the bit of my money I invest myself

Why not focus on your holiday rather than posting nonsense here

Yes you know so much that you have to Google someone else's definition of name plate capacity

You know so much that you genuinely think that Hainan would sign up to pay for the absolute maximum that the plant could ever produce each and every month. An amount that is more than the original assumed capacity of the plant.

You know so much that you don't know the difference between a minimum offtake amount and a floor price.

Why do you bother.

This is the only board you post on and clearly have no investment

Lav, check the thread, he's simply not worth it.

He can't even admit to not knowing the difference between floor price in dollars and offtake in tonnes.

As the old saying goes an idiot is still a chef by any other name

Cheers Fed

Just checked on HL and it's in the shareholder meeting section, but doesn't appear to show as an RNS either here or on HL

So not only is he as thick as pig doodoo he is a liar to boot.

No surprise there I guess

Imagine not knowing the difference between floor price and offtake amounts

Cheers Lav

Wow amazing that you are too thick to even understand the difference between a floor price in dollars and a minimum agreed offtake amount in tonnes

Enough said

Ofcourse they are taking 100%. But they aren't signing up as a minimum to pay for the maximum amount the plant could produce each and every month. As, sometimes there will be down time and they won't hit name plate every single month.

It's a simple enough concept that anyone with an average IQ could grasp.

I guess therein lies the problem

Have you actually seen notice of the AGM Fed?

Well I'm not sure I agree with Lav on that one.

But in any event there are two different things

Firstly, hitting nameplate is a great achievement and I'm sure it will happen shortly. That may or may not trigger the permit.

Secondly, no sensible business would ever sign up to guarantee payment for the maximum amount of product that can be produced, knowing that every production facility in the world has down time.

You genuinely are as thick as the porcine proverbial.

Are you really that thick Joe Bloggs

Because there will be times over the contract period that name plate won't be hit.

It happens at every mine and most factories in the world for many good and different reasons.

So why would Hainan ever sign up to guaranteed payment for the maximum amount the mine could ever produce.

I really hope you don't run a business