Member Info for Bfdinvestor

What on earth are you on about.

That is a simple statement of accounting fact, not an acceptance that KOD is responsible for paying back £15m

You really are as thick as the proverbial chef bloggs

No Hexam, so that you can stop referring erroneously to something that you haven't even watched.

Hexam do us both a favour and actually go and watch the presentation

Ocean if PLT sells for a similar amount to Top Shop, which is what Dan alludes to in the presentation, how could exceptional cash costs from closing one warehouse that Debs actually owns even come close to this figure?

I'm also a little surprised by your comment that growth prospects are low, given that the primary engne of GMV growth grew by 34% in the last financial year

Next question will DEBS release their half year results on time

Are you saying the full year results were late?

CWWX it's really simple, go and actually watch the presentation then you won't need to speak in spurious terms or post pointless abusive rubbish

The outlook clearly refers to FY26 and maybe a little further in the presentation. We are almost half way through FY26 so it isn't really a crystal ball gazing thing is it

Serious question Bfd......

If that was in the outlook part of the presentation, then by definition outlook is what they're expecting in the future right?

Ok one last point, although the question is stupid not serious

Outlook refers to FY25 and a little beyond. So it isn't some spurious concept as we are almost half way through FY26.

If that is your view of Finley why do you hold shares here, or maybe like the other trolls you don't

Don't bother answering as your answer wouldn't be worth the paper it isn't written on

And there you go again with the lies and false narrative CWWX.

Making up stuff because you have nothing sensible to add.

Why embarrass yourself

This is now pointless and I have zero interest in sinking to your level so that's my last post on this subject

Enjoy your night

You have NEVER said "All I am saying is that the presentation makes no reference to adjusted EBITDA at that point, but it does later"

You totally denied it said "Adjusted"

No I didn't. It is two completely separate bullet points. Just as I posted earlier.

So rather than wasting your time embarrassing yourself why not just go and actually watch the presentation

It's very simple, even you will understand it

Hexam, as I've posted about five times now, the comment was in the outlook part of the presentation. So nothing to do with the FY25 results

Maybe try reading rather than looking for what you want to see

Or maybe take the time to watch the actual presentation

I guess you haven't watched the presentation CWWX. Maybe you should give it a go, rather than posting angry, petulant and paranoid rubbish.

You don't speak for everyone on this board, you don't add any value to any conversation about the actual business, all you do is try and drown out anything that isn't 100% negative.

Whatever happened to 13p yesterday. That is about all you are good for

Hexam the trading profitably was in the context of now. Not the annual results. It may be they have just moved to profitability. Equally you may be correctly who knows. All I am saying is that the presentation makes no reference to adjusted EBITDA at that point, but it does later.

For now I will take Finley at face value.

It seems to me that if so many businesses use EBITDA as a metric it must be reasonable. Clearly you don't agree which is your prerogative

Not much point in going round in circles

Youre in this up to your eyeballs so I "get" why you do BUT everybody apart from your alter ego's can see right through you.

So there is only one person creating a narrative or trying manipulate anything CWWX.

I'm simply pointing out what is said in the presentation

It's a shame your more reasonable tone couldn't last more than one post before reverting to type CWWX. But I guess it isn't a surprise. Still with the Tradey and multiple log in nonsense when you have no form of rational argument.

I'd worry about yourself rather than anybody else, you sound like a paranoid child

So you think you know better than nearly every CFO Hexam, they clearly think EBITDA is a decent enough metric.

Good to see so many flocking to southcoasts defence though. Can't possibly have anything that goes counter to the troll narrative

Claiming all brands are trading 'profitably' is also really stretching it as they are clearly talking about this also in terms of the adjusted EBITDA metric rather than overall profitability or even plain EBITDA.

This is your opinion Hexam, it isn't clear at all. Go and listen to the presentation

It is, however, a metric that is used by nearly every business CWWX.

Talking about shouting though, I see you haven't shouted about 13p today.

Now you are just embarrassing yourself even more

It must be some holiday

Also, it's good to see one of the uninvested idiots appear so quickly, presumably to defend you.

So glad I don't see what he posts as he has nothing to add.

Go watch the outlook part of the presentation southcoast

It's even written there

All brands now trading profitably.

That's the second bullet point. No mention of on an adjusted basis

Nope i'm referring to the presentation, where he clearly said trading profitably now on an EBITDA basis

How can they hide anything for a financial period that hasn't even finished

When are you going to stop making these categoric statements when you keep getting them so catastrophically wrong. Let's recap

Suspension was nailed on

5p sp after results

Admin was guaranteed

Company wouldn't even make it to the AGM

Why not give it a rest and enjoy your holiday. It should be a good day in Cleethorpes after all