Member Info for Bfdinvestor

No, southcoast, they really aren't, as the article states. You just can't help lying can you. I had already voted against that resolution

. We are pleased that both ISS and Glass Lewis supported all binding resolutions.

Almagest I think you are misinterpreting the accounts

I think you are referring to the impairment of asset section?

If so you have only quoted one terminal growth rate. For instance the Semnet one is 30% not 2%

I also can't see where 15% is referenced in this section for the next five years. Perhaps you could confirm.

As this is simply for impairment calculation purposes and is a long term DCF model, I doubt if it is actually reflects anywhere near what the BoD expect to happen over the next couple of years

Oh I find this quite cathartic Ocean

Seeing the green boxes and the other uninvested helps highlight how blessed a life not full of negativity and envy really is.

No I'm not Ocean

But better that than the ground hog day that all of you 'investors" seems to inhabit

Who are Hilton Smythe Ocean

They are hardly a household name advising massive businesses.

More likely rent a quote for a bit of publicity

Oh yeah that is hardly the same as the previous comments is it.

And from the highly accurate Telegraph article that vanished

And I don't recall Frasers ever offering £175m, it was just the £125 wasnt it. And nobody knows what terms Frasers would have attached.

Her number one priority is ensuring that tranche 3 isn't drawn down as that basically hands control of the company to Shemasian.

Priority two is stopping it converting

Good spot, I don't recall it ever being discussed

I just recall a number of conversations about how Robertson was making it all up from the usual suspects.

I'd guess from the amount of spend it must have got a fair way down the path

. The loan has been described as higher rate and drawn criticism from Frasers.

I recall Frasers calling the last RCF the worst finance deal ever. I don't recall anything such about this one?

Perhaps you can explain

So let's sum up the valuable input from troll corner

1. Let's obsess and bore everyone with Tradey fantasies

2. The BoD are crooks/clowns

3. There is no plan and never has been

4. The business is screwed and hurtling towards admin

5. Despite posting hysterically about the same four things for months we all continue to hold our shares... Honest guv

Now let's look at an alternative

1. The new management who, although inexperienced at full BoD level, actually really understand online and have a fantastic track record of success.

2. If you stop focusing on hysteria and other posters, there is a place to be seen. The number of brands is reduced, the cost base has been reduced by hundreds of millions, the business is well on the way to being right sized, Debenhams is now profitable and capital lite and is being replicated on the other brands. The business review seems to be really slow, but that may be because of Nda's. The focus of the business is moving from fast fashion to more profitable areas

3. The cash outflow has reduced dramatically and the new RCF probably gives flexibility for the next two years.

4. Perhaps the real idiots are the posters who repeat the same hyperbolic and negative stuff day after day and expect others to believe that they continue to hold shares.

Its like a pay day loan for business.

Comical. If it was 15%+ you could maybe claim that.

Amazing the ADog isn't still claiming it will be many months before trading resumes

There was apparently no chance before the arbitration process completed

Personally, I can't see why it won't be tomorrow

I know who he is also - we spoken manyntimes on the phone....

Southcoast we don't know each other

We have never spoken on the phone.

You are really starting to take your fantasy world too far

Their extraction of cash runs far deeper than most can imagine.. If only we got Mike lennon on the board to se what was going on.....

So you didn't mention Frasers. Just who nominated Lennon then? You just can't help lying

You have been posting for weeks about how Kamani has taken share holders to the cleaners in a dishonest way for months and using the IPO as part of that

You need to give it a rest

And how can your opinion on something you know nothing about ever be a fact

There is an exact comparison

Kamani sold off part of Boohoo, a business he had built from nothing. You keep pitching this as some sort of bad or shady deal.

Ashley sold off £800m of Sports Direct. Is that also shady.

The Boo IPO was at 50p in 2014, so Kamani may have made lots of people lots of money, which is also something you always ignore.

Amazing you can't see the comparison given you think Ashley is some form of solution here

Cheers, you are right, I'd missed that bit of the RNS

Everything you post claims dishonesty

How much did Ashley take out of sports direct

What you are posting is plain ridiculous

So you call an IPO theft.

How much would people investing at IPO have made if they had stayed around a few years.

The answer to your question is a lot less than Ashley took out of Sports Direct

Do you call that theft as well

The broker warrants were exercisable at 0.12 as far as I can see. The only conversion I'm aware of at 0.08 are the convertible loan, unless anybody else knows better?

Fed I agree it makes sense.

I think the overall cost reduction plan has worked at real pace.

What I'm really frustrated at is the speed of the brand review and the overall Comms.

It's why I think PLT must be further on than most seem to think.

It's not far off a year now since the business review was announced and it doesn't take that long to come up with a plan