Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Strange how you are avoiding answering why you think a placing is required Wents

Let's just move on to the next unsubstantiated piece of fud, it's far easier isn't it?

Hh just go and look at the revenue and net asset figures in the accounts

It makes the current sp look ridiculous

Southcoast why are you attributing something Bon Scott said to me.

You need to stop this anger posting, just the lying by itself is bad enough

Why would you think a growth company would be valued at as little as 7 times revenue Kat

That is plain daft imo

So let me translate bon Scott

Other than your Tradey fetish you have nothing to say

Thanks for confirming

Maybe you could explain where they are blasting all this money bon Scott

Given that capex is massively down and forecast to fall further. Stock levels are also massively down and headcount cost has been reduced by 50m annually before the Burnley closure.

Maybe at some point you will replace your Tradey fetish with some actual shares.

Wents we got nearly half a million in warrants a couple of weeks ago, which the MMs used to trash the sp like it was a placing.

Why would there be a need for more money, especially when we have millions in WCE shares

So I'll post what you actually said again, just so you look even more stupid. You don't know that what we are producing is 5.5%. Every published result so far has been above 5.5%. The common denominator in the calculation is 6% SMM spod price. Now go and have a rest you have embarrassed yourself enough ched bloggs

So it's based on sc5.5 (currently produced) and shipping from Africa = what I said. dh

This is what you actually said. Which is totally wrong. I can only assume you are genuinely that stupid

So it's based on sc5.5 (currently produced) and shipping from Africa = what I said. dh

Still trying to drown out anything positive southcoast

So sad

Have you actually read the AR.

The 1.7m award in shares, which I assume you include, has only partially vested so he doesn't have access to these

What you continue to ignore, which is actually far more interesting going forward is the simple fact that Finley's salary is hundreds of thousands less than the previous CEO

It's strange your mention Egypt seeing as you are totally wrapped up in ancient history

I'm far more interested in stuff like the designers at Debenhams incentives or the US link up which you seem desperate to drown out

Seems you still can't help name calling like a six year old bully CWWX

Sad

Have you asked KGtrades why 7p is likely

Thought not

I'd prefer it of course if greater emphasis were applied to stopping the business from wasting so much money, and into generating more sales.

So you don't think relaunching designers at Debenhams, with the great PR it is generating, isn't aimed at increasing sales Bon Scott?

It aged perfectly well but why are you trying to drown out anything positive again

Gotta work the CFD?

Great to see designers at Debenhams relaunched with lots of positive PR

No it's based on 6% and adjusted.

So the price for 5.7% will be different to the price for 5.6%. But the difference is based on difference from 6% not 5.5%

Are you really so thick that this is too complicated for you

It's based on an adjusted price for sc5.5 coming from Africa also shown in SMM, learn to read.

No chef bloggs it isn't.

It's based on 6% adjusted for grade and quality.

We don't know the exact calculation.

Published grade so far has been above 5.5%

Maybe drop the aggression and develop some humility

Funny to see the trolls trying to drown anything positive again.

Kim Cattrall has over 2m insta followers

Debenhams has an older audience.

The PR already looks impressive

Not a bad choice

MT it's just what he does. He lies, pretends he hasn't and then starts the circle again.

He forgets that the vast majority of the legacy payments relate to payments made for growing Debenhams.com from nothing to a near £700m GMV business.

But he also ignores the most important point, which is that Finley's salary is now hundreds of thousands a year less than his predecessor.

Does the

So southcoast you have moved from 4.5m remuneration for the year to less than half that.

As Hexam as posted, in agreement to my previous posts, lots of his package is in shares and is vested over time so he hasn't been paid it. It relates to growing Debenhams.com from nothing to newely £700m gmv

The remuneration committee in my view got it wrong. It's old news. Move on

His current salary, which has no associated bonus package at present, is £650k per year. This is not excessive and is hundreds of thousands per year less than the previous CEO

He wasn't paid 4.5m in remuneration as you claim.

Go and read the deferred share elements

His actual cash salary would be in the region on £1.35m, then legacy benefits from his time running Debenhams.

Still a lot more profitable than running your CFD I'd guess

I'd agree that the remuneration committee got it wrong

His actual salary of £650k is less than the previous CEO was paid and isn't particularly high for a CEO