Member Info for Bfdinvestor

So southcoast you have moved from 4.5m remuneration for the year to less than half that.

As Hexam as posted, in agreement to my previous posts, lots of his package is in shares and is vested over time so he hasn't been paid it. It relates to growing Debenhams.com from nothing to newely £700m gmv

The remuneration committee in my view got it wrong. It's old news. Move on

His current salary, which has no associated bonus package at present, is £650k per year. This is not excessive and is hundreds of thousands per year less than the previous CEO

He wasn't paid 4.5m in remuneration as you claim.

Go and read the deferred share elements

His actual cash salary would be in the region on £1.35m, then legacy benefits from his time running Debenhams.

Still a lot more profitable than running your CFD I'd guess

I'd agree that the remuneration committee got it wrong

His actual salary of £650k is less than the previous CEO was paid and isn't particularly high for a CEO

He wasnt paid anywhere near that as the actual figures I've posted show southcoast.

And the Debenhams figures are mainly long term incentives relating to his entire term at Debenhams where it went from nothing to nearly £700m GMV

Can't help lying to work that CFD can you?

MT go and have a look at p98 of the annual report, it is all there.

It's Adobe so I can't paste it ATM

Lloyd the related party figure you refer to is $260k.

This could purely relate to Semnet as there is no further breakdown given

What we don't know is Finley's salary in the first seven months of the year when he was just heading up Debenhams.com. I'd guess about £300k.

Which would mean his actual cash salary and bonus, excluding legacy benefits, would be £1.35m

Rather than ask dumb questions southcoast, here is the appropriate detail from the annual report. Additionally he was paid a

2025 package

Annual salary £650k

cash bonus of £400k .

Legacy awards

Share awards vesting immediately 1.1m

Partially vested shares 1.7m and 290k

cash award 1.1m

It's also worth noting that Finley's salary is considerably less than John Lyttle was paid and no bonus scheme is yet in place per the annual report

Adderblack there is one other troll I've filtered who uses exactly that saying.

How many log ins do you have kiddo

As for the rest of your verbal diarrhoea I haven't got a clue what you are on about.

As for your previous post, I don't post defamatory and libellous comments unlike southcoast.

Oh dear super mouse demonstrating supreme stupidity again

Go and look up how fraud works half wit

So southcoast npw you are claiming they have deliberately misled the market and the auditors are complicit in the deception

#desperate for money

Again, this is my belief and I don't tey to force it down anyone else's throat...Its my opinion you could say also.

The number of times you have posted this says otherwise

Keep working the CFD though you must be desperate for the money

So Bob Holt asked others to think about something southcoast

You are stating it as a definite opinion

Totally different

There is a reason Revb Couches their statement in legalese.

Maybe you should learn from them and stop posting outright lies.

You must be desperate for the CFD money

Bob Holt said nothing of the sort as far as I'm aware.

You are stating that Kamani's haven't disclosed their total holdings or a concert party position which is basically illegal.

It's one of a long string of outright lies you have told southcoast.

You clearly hold no shares here so why continue to do it.

I don't respond to all your posts, just the most outrageously stupid ones.

If you stop making lying statements I will have no reason to respond

Danners Bernard is correct

AISC normally doesn't include tax as it's an operational cost measure

I don't believe the ownership of this company is truly reflected by the rns history

So once again southcoast you are claiming illegal behaviour.

The moderators really need to ban you

So you managed to miss a £1m buy a whole two months ago unhooked.

That's some top research

Not like you don't have form lol

The idiot is just trying to pick an argument, an AGM is never going to be an announcement scenario.

They know the upgrade is there

Southcoast strange that you don't understand the role of market makers at all.

Maybe it's not so strange given you hold no shares lol

Simon

You are wrong

Not often Hexam and I agree but on this one we do

Market makers are there to provide liquidity not match a buyer to a seller.

End of