Member Info for Bfdinvestor

Nor will they convince anyone that you hold shares

Totally agree massive I was in an oil explorer I'd written off about two years earlier.

Suddenly came back to life from nowhere and I made about 300%

I've reported the previous thread as it is headed by a lie and full of other lies

No suprise as it is started by the multi log in with no life

The multi log in idiot is at it again today I see Lav.

I'm amazed LSE haven't done anything about the stream of continual lies.

It's just consoling to know that the idiot has no life and makes you realise how good your own existence is in comparison

Sorry posted on the wrong thread originally. Don't want to give the multi alias idiot air time

I doubt if they can even calculate the AISC totally accurately as some of the contract costs will have variable elements I'd guess.

For example I'd be amazed if there wasn't contractual flex for transport cost given the current situation

All I need to know for now is there is a considerable difference between the cost of spod and the worst case figure that is oft quoted

I doubt if they can even calculate the AISC totally accurately as some of the contract costs will have variable elements I'd guess.

For example I'd be amazed if there wasn't contractual flex for transport cost given the current situation

All I need to know for now is there is a considerable difference between the cost of spod and the worst case figure that is oft quoted

Wow the multi login idiot is at it again

Seems to forget that two directors bought more shares at.24.

Seems to forget that that they told us Steve had left the business

Seems to forget that the $15m is disputed and in any event has been covered off by the loan.

Luckily actual investors don't forget the rubbish posted by chef brown

It's kind of informative about the MM strategy here that as soon as there is a little buying pressure they immediately try to create a false spread

Goh's £40k is more embarrassing that anything else as he's down 50%. BoD are also down 65% on their bigger holdings. Yes. they#re n for the long haul but it's their job! the only upside of that is 0.68 makes this a 2-4-1 on the £40k buy (what does that say about his understanding of the biz!) and near 3-4-1 on their original buys.

Actually Kat the only person this embarrasses is you

So you are staying that the executive chair of the business doesn't understand the business or industry despite having spent decades working in it and despite being highly intelligent and successful.

What it shows imo is the vagary of the market and stupidity of the sp not any lack of intellect or ability of Goh

Yeah we need a cleaner simon

Wow can't believe the idiot is still posting his stupidity about the export permit.

Just as he kept posting his stupidity about the grade calculation

I thought it was only women who were so right when they were wrong.

Then again he is also Sylvia Browne lol

Key personnel?

In position for less than a year so probably couldn't cut it

Good to see the cabal of the uninvested hard at it again though

Looks like your Bs about Suay Chin increasing the speed of their selling was exactly that chef brown

if they were selling faster as you posted we would have had an RNS before now.

Looks like you and Danners are cut from the same cloth

Strange danners ive just been offered .2712 for 1m no problem at all

didnt sell obviously

Billy I looked at it a few years ago and it just screamed lifestyle company

Which is what those same idiots were saying about GST yesterday lol

This s the opposite of lifestyle.

Strange to see Kat still trying to support it.

Nobody would have got in at the open price and all those people buying at .35 and above i guess will see the reality of a true lifestyle company

A couple of our not so positive contributors were lauding UKOG yesterday about how to come out of suspension.

I wonder if they still share that view today

I guess it shows the danger of following the money and not doing any form of research

Yes Billy I posted at the time that it was most likely a 3-5 year contract. We were also told at the time that the vast majority of the contract was for hardware, which would need to be installed and set up.

This element would be done at cost for the hardware and an hourly rate for installation.

The ongoing elements would be around upgrades and maintenance

The vast majority of the contract value would, therefore have been in the set up phase, so it makes sense that it would have been accounted for prior to our ownership.

The arbitration could be over a number of issues and not something I'm prepared to speculate on due to lack of knowledge

But I'm confident that this is how the contract would have been structured

It seems strange to me that nobody has considered that the ex Semnet directors are selling to fund the arbitration.

They did get the best part of 60m shares.

Far more likely than forward selling imo

Hardly chef bloggs, but I'm always happy to call out lying posters

I doubt it anyone on here values your advice

Now compare them to the previous year!