RE: The bottom line.10 Jan 2021 11:23
I agree Nanonano but if Nanosys had a process that could deliver the right quality at the right volume (fair assumption if the collaboration with LG is producing commercial products) and that process doesn't leave the signs NANO says reveal their process then why didn't Samsung use that? Conversely, if they did and it does leave the same signs as NANO's process then the smoking gun in the patent case has got a missing firing pin.
A third possibility is that LG did the research with Nanosys and have had to go to someone like NANO through one of their partners maybe to build product in commercial volumes and that's why Nanosys aren't crowing about these new TVs.
This is all over simplified logic no doubt.