Member Info for Banburyboy

Spec none of the bashers on here are paid. In the main ex holders who are tired of the lies that the company constantly puts out. Helpful says he did not say Glencore would pay redies and no of us can read and there it is in black and white in Helpfuls 19.24 8th July Post.

The only poster on here that is "conflicted" he may or may not be paid is Helpful as he is a close freind and confident of Andrew Bell.

I have given them a chance on Tin Hill and despite promises Helpful is setting the scene for no Tin Hill update. The world is now so rosy with multiple licences Tin Hill is of no relevance anymore.

Yes Duke that's 700m shares assuming .1p issue price.

Need news fast on Tin Hill to get a higher issue price.

If DRC comes good or as Helpful says Glencore hand over the readies no share issue needed.

Big couple of weeks.

Jonfon - you don't post oftern but your recent post sums up perfectly where we are.

Tin Hill update would be good

Mip1 - two weeks ago you called it fantastic entertainment now its sniping and counter sniping.

Investing in RRR is not for the faint hearted !!!

Helpful as I and others have said numerous time Lithium prices are not relevant if you are not selling anything !!

It seems the latest position is no seperatev tin Hill update as we now have five licences so it's out of date.

It doesn't take a genius to report separately on Tin Hill.

What we are really saying is no progress on TH but you will fiddle whilst Rome burns and post lithium prices. !!

H5O great post. Completely agree

As I have repeatedly said thf next RNS needs detailed plan and milestones for Tin Hill only.

It sounds too good to be true in terms of quotes so far. If we have a clear sensible plan on Tin Hill it will massively improve sentiment.

Helpful - that's balance and objectivity and I've would my neck in on Zimbabwe as promised. I really think this could be a game changer but Bell needs to avoid twitter telegram and talk to shareholders via RNS.

Sounds like another bad luck story Helpful but for our appalling luck we would have a $2bn asset rather than a tenuous $10m claim which is unlikely to reach fruition. And you would be 100 fold up on your advice rather than 15 fold down. And you accuse the bashers of living in the past :).

Bottom line is you have called RRR wrong for years and that you can't escape that.

New - trader a new poster !! My debate is not with you. For me the view that anyone who posts negatively somehow wants to get in cheaper is idiocy . No offence meant but that's the stuff of five year old (let alone Helpfuls teenage poster)

Some might want to get in cheaper for me I have time on my hands, detailed company knowledge, quite a few fellow posters who share my views and I'm keen no one else is sucked in by the ridiculous ramping that Bell solicits and encourages.

So no not here for a profit rather in the interests of balance objectivity and fair mindedness. Not everyone is motivated by money.

Helpful when I get kisses which you reserve for others I know I've hit a nerve :)

Helpful let's forget detail and look at the bigger picture and the strategic.

- You have ramped this relentlessly and it's fallen in value 30 fold since you appeared. It may double tommorrow but you will still be out by a factor of 15.

- I have warned relentlessly all was not what it seems.

Who was right . You cost people you were advising a fortune I saved them.

Yes I did offer to wind my neck in re Zimbabwe which I have done. I'm waiting for Tin Hill only not the next licence. Tin Hill production sales 500k a month etc.

Based on performance and punditry - I think you should perhaps have a bit more contrition.

Never mind consol yourself with posting latest lithium or gold prices or how well others on adjacent plots have done.

Bottom line is RRR has performed terribly and you have been wrong at every juncture.

Let's hope you have called Tin Hill and DRC correct as your form reads FF/PU/F/0/0F.

Even money next RNS fund raise. But I would be delighted for you and holders if Tin Hill / DRC comes good. I will then wish you all well and my neck will be wound completely in. Until then I will constructively challenge.

Hi Helpful have you ever had or made a negative comment about anything RRR does. Non stop hyperbole and in the time you have been on the board Shareholder value has fallen 30 fold. So you have been wrong on every shout.

This post is a bit below the belt and I get you are limited on what you can say on ALR but to say

" I am very happy with where we are now on DRC" really sticks.

We have carried the "promise of DRC" for far too long as a "crutch" to lean on and excuse to such a degree one of the posters normally in your court H5O is questioning DRCs validity as a recoverable asset.

Good judgement is about balance proportionality lack of bias and objectivity whilst being mindful of risk. I think your comment I am happy with where we are in DRC is really poor judgement and most posters would concur. H5O is right to pose his rather skeptical and probing questions on DRC.

I'm glad you clarified KOTB.

Accepting even the merged company is undervalued which I do as well [ but not as good as no deal pre TWND SQZ]. The issue still is Mecuria control. It's not just the blocking interest on votes but every deal or transaction through are books will be to parties / interests that benefit Mecuria. Its the ultimate conflict of interest and ordinary shareholders will be poorer because of it.

Sour grapes - yes and accepting the new company is what it is the strategic financial landscape has been clouded unfortunately perminantly.

Just looked over at the other board and to me at least it seems Andrews personal stock and the perception of him has never been lower.

Lots of unanswered questions on DRC and as Hawai says no public transcripts, dates evidence of any progress. Andrew I know you read this Board and postings. An independent report on recoverability of DRC might go a long way to address concerns.

In addition a quick publication of six or seven detailed milestones on Tin Hill [ no one is interested in Jam tommorrow licences] . Even your supporters accuse you of having far ro many plates spinning. Had you stopped plate spinning and just took the Jupiter revenue we would be multiples of where we are now. The Jupiter income was wasted and eventually the asset was sold to fund more "plates" that all crashed.

Even you most avid supporters suggest you should focus on Zimbabwe. My advice leave out Telegram and Twitter. Focus on communication through RNS or as you used to do news letters. Throw everything at Tin Hill and be honest about how we perform against published milestones

Helpful your comments about the difficulties of navigating the legal system I suspect equally apply to doing business in Zimbabwe.

A month next week with no info on sales at Tin Hill.

News would be good even if just price received and tonnes sold.

Thanks Proctor. So the price of oil is irrelevant to this Board !!!@

Would you rather like the other numskulls on this board who most of us have blocked I talk about Covid Soros and the global conspiracy Qanon etc.

I've seen some cheerless grumpy posts but yours takes the biscuit. Careful what you wish for

WTI just cracked $73. Highest in a month.

Things begining to look more positive.

Andrew Bells - published words were "we realised we were negotiating in good faith with someone who had no authority and was not a party to the dispute"

At the time there was lots of keystone cops type comments.

For me this is a huge red flag as is the fact he has not sold on the interest for $2m or so. He would have done this if he could its his way.

Smart money is its dead but Andrew doesn't like a

Losing (nor does anyone) and coming clean will.decimate the SP which of course he doesn't want.

I don't think.we will ever know it will just dissapear completely. except for me and the other saddos on here who will remind new investors.

Stevo - my thoughts kign analysis was fine but the start point was far to low. EBIITD.

You've proved the point most on here subscribe to that $400m on buy backs and divy I'd affordable.

In two years time we will have 600m shares which means a materially increased divy.

Kign

I can see your logic but your gross earnings figure seem low to me for the year. I have it nearly double at $3.5BN.

Same calculations but on a higher base dividends / buy backs affordable

I can almost feel the confidence draining away from the Maqsood's Daytrader etc. Bladderman clinging on.

Helpful also really quiet.

To be clear - no one is disputing the asset rather Bell and RRRs ability to create value to shareholders. Next RNS is probably critical.

I realised and posted DRC was dead over a year ago - there has been no official news since that time just mild ramping.

If DRC happens we have the cash which I think we need to develop the asset. When that happens this will fly. In accounting terms the prospect is too remote to warrant disclosure. You are clutching at straws

Unless they are convertible to cash at 10% interest. AB can't raise any other way as SP has fallen 99% in 15 years.

As many have said it must turn eventually. But they said that every year for the last three.

Fundamental issue is AB is allways chasing his tail and presides over ending share issues that more than destroy any accretive value.

So yes our market cap may be silly but any increase won't go to you it will be absorbed in a higher base of issued shares.

RRR is a lifestyle company and that needs to change.

Never-say. Add the IX exploration well to that. As others have posted the fact the rig is still on site a week after its out of contract - sounds really promising.

Whys it not £4 - general uk market doom and fear of labour. I think the second is over done. I don't think Kier will raise EPL. I m not sure no new licences and new drilling will survive but not sure it impacts HBR materially. I think maximum bad news is priced in.