RE: A quick aside to this currently freewheeling discussion8 Jul 2025 16:12
Mick have you ever thought the only reason WG can let new contracts is because SID are providing guarantees to lenders ? Might even be a lender themselves as of now per the terms of the take over.
I agree we need the best outcome for shareholders.
I trust Rothschilds, the big PIs and yes even this very poor board to achieve that.
In my view WG is in real trouble and going it alone is not an option at all.
I hope SIDs grip is not to tight to stiffle other interest. Again that's for the advisors BOD and big PIs to assure us on.
The prospect that WG can go it alone with all this awful news is a falicy IMO. Lenders will want paying ASAP and debt for equity will be a wipe out.
Just my opinion and yes ICE if SID take over it will happen IMO without accounts as the majority if the SHs[ big PIs] determine it is appropriate.
What I hate here is ICE belittling posters and presenting his views as fact.