Member Info for Bamps21

I’m really excited about the Eastern breccia remarks, remember 4holes have been assay pending they must know by now.
These are sticking out through the eastern breccia perimeter that I’m aware of.
Also the remark of them trying to connect the Northern breccia with the NW extension (would confirm my lower ovoid theory.
Not exciting, my a••e, as Paddy said :))

Hi Trigga
I’ve used 0.75g/t average
The company are using 0.55g/t at the mo
The 0.55 doesn’t include the better grades of the eastern and northern breccia + SE crescent deeps

Cadia PFS average grades 0.5g/t and 0.28% copper

Hi Tom
Where has the 400m come from?
The Decline is nowhere near the vent position yet,
The vent will be situated at the top of the spiral approx 176m deep and about 750m from the box cut at an angle. Total length of decline is c2,700m
Looks like work has started on the base construction of the vent and escape holes.
ATB :))

There are 15 drills not reported in the last NCM exploration report marked assay pending.
Only 2 of these are targeting the sulphides but below the MRE inferred resource level.
The MRE indicated resource has enough drills to put into the PFS down to 350m.
In the MRE RNS it states under Jorc rules not enough drilling had been undertaken to include the Northern breccia except some high grade pockets.
These 15 drills and 1 part drill are targeting the Northern breccia and northern crescent apart from a few targets in the SE breccia.
6 of these drills have poked out through unexplored zones in the eastern breccia and southern extension. That is very exciting to increase volume.
What are these drills likely to find ?
Well SD was getting very excited about the Northern corridor of high grade zone. This looks to me more high grade breccia than sulphides.
The last MRE was split into 3 Domains of mineralisation which didn’t include the weak crackle.
This again doesn’t look as though it’s been targeted for the inferred resource in December.
It’s the high grade breccia they’re after not as high as the sulphides but decent long grade intercepts.
I would imagine these would be split into 2 Domains for the coming inferred resource down to around 700m.
What are these Domains best to look at the last MRE RNS
“ domain- specific metallurgical recoveries of 84-94% for Au and 82-92% for Cu, a AUD/USD exchange rate of 0.75, as well as treatment and refining costs, payabilities and royalties, similar to those at Telfer.
Ordinary Kriging of gold and copper was undertaken into 10m x 10m x 10m blocks and re-blocked into 5m x 5m x 5m blocks. The resource model was domained utilising the geological units of the Crescent Zone, the Calcite Cemented Breccia and Actinolite Cemented Breccia. Hard boundaries were used between all three Zones.”

We know from this that the MRE was formed by using these 3 geological mineralisation.
Now we are expecting no sulphides apart from a few pockets so there are 2 Domains of breccia calcerite and actinolite. I’ve read somewhere on the NCM web site that the calcerite has slightly better recovery %, actinolite was also one of the minerals at Telfer producing the gold and copper, so that’s very positive.
I’ve read that the actinolite degrades to chlorite and carbonates, i believe copper accumulation occurs with the chlorites and gold in the carbonates but that needs confirming
The northern corridor sounds like it’s both these 2 Domains but they haven’t been itemised as far as I know, it stretches from under the SE crescent zone and rising up through the centre and out into the North west extension.
All very exciting and growing :))

Saddlereef
They seem to be drilling around SR01 probably at an angle NE to intersect SR12 which was drilled SW angle and found gold between 67m and 100m.
The second spot seems to be around SR12,13,10
SR10 is where the gold is at surface 36m @ 0.35 g/t

https://greatlandgold.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/20191114_GGP_Announcement_Black-Hills-Update.pdf
Page 5

Hi Gerry
By 2018 Saddlereef had a great deal of drill exploration and survey reports similar to Havieron.
Both had mineralisation identified at that point in time.

Hi Malva
This Greatland map is not so detailed
https://greatlandgold.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/PatMagTen_05-08-20.jpg

There’s another one somewhere

Hi Malva
https://wcsecure.weblink.com.au/pdf/ARV/02369503.pdf
Page 17

Hi Malva
Thanks for that link
The same Dyke through Havieron runs north into Outamind.
There’s also a fault running round the north of Outamind passing that tail of Goliath and off south to the Havieron thrust fault passed Budgiedown and Apollo

Well that was our third June of Newcrest drilling at Havieron
June 2019 = 2,800m drilled in total
June 2020 = 28,000m drilled I total
June 2021 = 184,018m drilled in total

With the Newcrest full results due out on the 19th or is that our 18th Aug evening, will Sandeep announce something new?
Big risk to sell at mo in my opinion but some people have to sell.
Only 22 days to results night with at least 15 drills to announce , will there be news of the new targets?
News of the Juri jv due at anytime soon will they find mineralisation?

Too many announcements to be made to make an informed decision on whether to sell or not.
Well I’m leaving mine alone

From the RNS November 19

https://greatlandgold.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/20191106-GGP-Announcement-Paterson-Range-East-Geophysical-Targets.pdf

Basement rocks at Paterson Range East are interpreted to be predominantly calcareous rich sandstones intruded by several late stage granitic bodies. Historically, several of these targets have been subject to initial first-pass work, including limited drilling by Newcrest Mining Limited (“Newcrest”) in the early 1990s, and show promise at hosting mineralisation as seen at Havieron.

Greatland commissioned a detailed, low-level airborne magnetic survey to cover the entire Paterson Range East licence. The survey comprised approximately 5,200 line kilometres at a line spacing of 50m with a mean terrain clearance of 40m. Previous aeromagnetic coverage of the area included 200m and 400m line spaced surveys.
A comprehensive ground gravity survey has been completed at Paterson Range East. A total of 3,736 new gravity stations were collected over the entire tenement at a spacing of 400m by 200m with local infill at 200m by 200m over selected magnetic anomalies. Results from the recent ground gravity survey have been received and modelled, and are reported in this announcement.
Four primary targets and four secondary targets have been identified following modelling of the detailed magnetic and gravity data (Figures 2 and 3). MMI sampling has been completed at 200m by 200m sample spacing over all targets with results pending. The four primary targets are described below.

Goliath: Originally identified as a very high amplitude bulls-eye magnetic feature in Greatland’s recent aeromagnetic survey, Goliath is interpreted to be a metasedimentry dome with the magnetic anomaly at the fold hinge position. New gravity data shows a very large amplitude anomaly semi-coincident with the magnetic anomaly (Figure 4). Three historic drill holes were completed in the early 1990s off the northern edge of the magnetic anomaly failed to reach Proterozoic basement (OCE0102 - hole depth 88m)

Los Diablos: A bulls-eye high intensity magnetic anomaly located in a structurally favourable position (interpreted hinge zone of a folded sequence of metasedimentary rocks). The gravity response is of moderate to high amplitude and coincident with the magnetic feature (Figure 5). Three historic holes targeting the southern edge of the magnetic anomaly were drilled in the early 1990’s. These holes failed to adequately test the magnetic and gravity anomalies (CAW07 - hole depth 70m).

Just carrying on with Malva post now Zoros has woke up.
Referring to Goliath I am still quietly optimistic on the look out for Dykes/faults , there are a series of faults running NW -SE one runs through the centre of Goliath and is crossed by another fault at the centre of the magnetic bullseye anomaly.
Also there is a long tail running to the SW which ends on the dolerite Dyke next to Outamind.

Hi MFU
I have to agree with you , if we don’t find anything else on the Paterson I am still very happy with my investment in Havieron.
It’s the excitement in chasing that elusive new find.
Remember we still have found gold in Firetower, Warrantina, Meadows EG, panorama

Hi Mr B
It’s just conjecture until independently verified by a relevant qualified laboratory, it can’t be reported until then. This may be under Jorc regs

I was just thinking it’s too early for this and then Zoros post :))
Breakfast yum

Hi Zoros
Sorry mate :))

Hi Mr B
One theory I have for the delay is that being in the middle of nowhere they were not likely to take each core drill to the lab separately.
They would have been carrying these around for weeks before going to a core store at either Havieron or Telfer for cutting and sorting.
They may have been waiting for the Parlay drill before sending to the lab.

Thanks Malva I understand what you are explaining.
I have done a lot of delving into Had05 drill results and can see that as the drill passed through the Dyke the mineralisation on both sides is consistent with being pulled apart, which is why I’m assuming the Dyke was formed by post mineralisation movement over an existing fault.
The vertical nature of the breccia pipe ( and the depth) suggests this is not an anticline but fluids from the fault from different intrusion points, these can be seen partly by following the cross sections on the drill reports.
It’s still very early days yet for anyone especially me to understand the origins. Magic said I should leave it as this is Phd academic stuff but I still find it fascinating