Member Info for bald_eagle

"... surely our production numbers are increasing with our new machinery/ equipment etc. "
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NMH, the recent funds secured wont have been used yet, so any big increase in production wont be seen until 2020 & 2021. I expect 'they' are making plans during the cold winter months, signing contracts for more machinery/equipment/upgrades & ground work. So IMO we are unlikely to see much increase in gold produced (although it would be nice to see an uplift)....but an update with a sensible plan on what they are going to do next year would be very helpful.

TD, wise words.

"back to £5 on a decent Trading Update, then start to close the gap in terms of PE with the trade desk"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes me cringe to see supposedly right thinking people spouting such drivel.....so the next update will see the SP at £5, now that's what I call a wet dream.

There is a saying - that may be apt wrt TRMR - 'slowly slowly catch a monkey'.

But I suppose there are those that cannot help giving the monkey a little spank...to help it on its way!

Good luck to TRMR management for 2020 (& by extension investors)....let's hope they deliver on their promises (& make us investors happy!).

So STT1 seems to suggest that the technical update in early Jan may provide the impetus to get the SP towards 200p & above....great!

Eddie, I agree...wouldn't life be dull if we all had the same opinions & agreed on everything!

I would like to see the SP get above £2, does anyone have any ideas what will cause that and when?

"Besides I have kinda come to enjoy my exchanges with him at times !! lol"
-----------------------------------------
Eddie, I can understand that...perhaps you like the mental tussle of countering his claims.

But I hate repetitive posts - something that STT1 is famous for - and so just never read anything he writes. It just amazes me that people get sucked into conversing with him. But as long as you get something positive out of it, then that's a good thing. Perhaps debating with him confirms to you why TRMR is such exceptional value.

"And if you don't believe in the notion of organised de-rampers then you clearly weren't reading this board during the great blinkx short of 2014."
--------------------------------------------------------------
DrS, do you have trouble undertstanding what people write....I did NOT say that de-rampers cannot be organised. But I did question whether the fact that STT1 is apparently working alone means that he is part of an organised effort to suppress the SP of TRMR. Or perhaps STT1 is single handedly holding the SP around 150p!! Which would mean he would probably deserve respect and is a very rich person indeed.

Just ignore his posts and he may go away. Your constant moaning about him is possibly keeping him here because he likes winding up people like you.

"....Why did you buy in despite stt1 being apparently right in all his assertions?"
----------------------------------------
DrS, when did I say the STT1 was right in all his assertions?...I think you'll find I said to ignore him.

"Still waiting for baldeagle to tell us why he went long (or short) despite claiming stt1 has always been right?"
---------------------------------------
DrS, you seem to be under the rather naive illusion that what people say on forums is trustworthy and whatever they say is the truth. If I was to give you information about my investments (which I am not going to do) you wouldn't know if I was winding you up or not.

I will say that I firmly want TRMR to succeed....but you don't really know if I'm telling you the truth, do you?!

Tricky, wasn't it you who agreed that no one person (unless they are Warren Buffet) can move the SP of a company....and I believe that STT1 is all on his lonesome with the negative commentary. So how can he be part of an organised & well-funded attempt to suppress the SP?..if it was then their would be multiple versions of STT1 spreading rumours & negativity.

IMO the only way for STT1 to be 'beaten down' is by TRMR delivering strong growth & profits. Does anyone have any positive thoughts on when that will happen.

There seems to be a lot of paranoia about organised de-rampers....just ignore the bloke and wait for TRMR to deliver on their 'promises'.

Olympics next year...is that going to be a boost to TRMR?

"Stt1 isa buyer's friend, helping to keep downward pressure on the sp while his mates hoover up using algo trading....
Stt1 is a market manipulator, not an investor and works it both ways depending upon the needs of his clients."
---------------------------------------------------
DrS, so STT1 can single handedly influence the SP of companies like TRMR...he must be a very rich and powerful individual...is he Warren Buffet?

I suspect you are giving him more credence than he deserves.

Eddie & Tricky, how about just ignoring STT1....I expect he posts so often partly because he knows he will annoy you. If people ignore him then he may get bored and go annoy someone else.

Complaining about STT1 won't make him go away (it is probably his intention to annoy)....complaining won't make TRMR's SP performance or profitability any better....complaining won't make any difference I can see.

Probably the best way to get rid of STT1 is for TRMR to start delivering strong growth figures....but that is not in our control.

If STT1 stops posting will that make TRMR post bigger profits and deliver on its potential?

Or perhaps STT1 is singlehandedly suppressing the SP and if he stopped posting all his negative comments then the SP would be over £3.

Personally he can post what he likes....I never read any of his stuff anyway. I just hope TRMR management aren't reading his posts and taking things to heart....we don't want them contracting his negativity and it impacting their performance.

Unfortunately, based on SP alone, over the years the annoying warnings by STT1 have proven a better indicator about the performance of RHTM than is comfortable to admit. If TRMR was producing strong results then he would be easier to ignore but I suspect investors are a little worried that his so far accurate predictions about under performance will continue.

TRMR needs to start delivering on the potential that they keep telling us they have. Until then STT1 is difficult to ignore...if he has been shorting RTHM & TRMR all these years then he will have done very well....unfortunately.

Sadly investors are still waiting for jam tomorrow...will tomorrow ever come?!

RB, it will be good to know what they want to spend that money on and what are their production targets (for what they are worth) for the next 2 years...next year is going to be very busy & important for Altyn. Perhaps a name change or two....a stock consolidation...relisting on AIM....a branded coat of paint on the machinery. OR perhaps they will concentrate on what's most important and try to get as much gold ore out of the ground & processed. Fingers crossed.

what a cliche!

DJones, Is India what's wieghing down on the SP at the moment?

I suppose it could also be the 'prospect' of free broadband under a Corbyn government but I have a hunch that on Friday that particular threat could be ended....at least for the next 5 years.

Hazrat, exactly. I haven't read the article in question in quite a while and took what you said for granted. I was sure you were correct....so I quoted you because it saved me re-reading the paper.

MED did show benefits above placebo in the first trial but the rapid onset data needs more analysis...one of the things to look out for in the results (next week?!).

A placebo is often used in blind trials. This is different from a 'placebo effect' whereby an inert substance (a placebo) can have a therapeutic effect because the patient believes they are taking a medicine that will do them good, when in fact it is inert. If medicine behaves the same as a placebo then it is difficult to argue that it is having an effect...which was the case in terms of onset time, but not in other aspects of the initial trial (duration & firmness of the erection according to Hazrat).

The latest trial has been structured to try to get data that will reduce the chance of a placebo effect (I believe).