Member Info for Ayecuramba

Someone wants to move on quickly, unfortunately our BoD's signed irrevocable allegiance to the TXP offer, until such time as TXP release them from this or until the Jan. 2025 lapsing on the deal they have to stick to what they signed up for. That's just the facts, nice to see you bashing both TRIN and TXP, just the kind of shareholder every company dreams of :-)

Spread is lowest I have ever seen it, what shenanigans :-)

Don't need credibility with you thanks, just my belief in the numbers but thanks for caring :-)

On the basis I hold both stocks and therefore may been seen by some as even handed in my view, whereas you only hold TRIN and could be seen by some as intrinsically biased, hmmm...

I think this was a shareholder chat board, seems it's an all agree with Thunder board, my mistake :-)

Force is a strange word, see both sides of the equation is surely better than one side but seems you prefer the latter, each to their own dude...

I own both more on the TRIN side right now but the situation is fluid, like the deals :-) What about you?

No one is favouring lower offers, you are really struggling with this I can see, it's just about timeframe and LOL know this hence their speculative bid, once CAS 2 & 3 are brought online (well before the Jan. 2025 you seem keen to hold on for) TXP share price will rise and bring the TXP offer more inline (if not exceeding) the current LOL bid, lets see who votes which way then :-)

My half a brain says rather have greater value in a year than a quick win in 3-6 months but you do you :-)

Time will tell how many would take the TXP or LOL route, while their spot price maybe higher I am not sure (as you may have noticed I have said many times) that the long term value will be there for TRIN holders, therefore some with longer views than your would vote thru the TXP deal still, anyway lets hope it doesn't come to a vote and the BoD of both companies put on their big boy pants and strike a deal otherwise it's sit and wait until Jan. 2025...

If only they had not signed over their votes irrevocably the picture would be much different, also if the shareholders had not voted by over 90% for the TXP deal, this will give belief to TXP that with the existing 41% irrevocably tied to the TXP deal they would have a good chance of getting over 50% with another vote, this will need to get the TRIN, LOL and TXP teams together around a table to hash this out with some kind of deal, a competent and professional board would have already done this behind the scene :-)

Luckily some of us want those discussions and opinions from others, so to all the opinions on the board I say thank you, you all bring value and views that help expand the discussion and the knowledge of all, not one voice but many :-)

Well looks like Trinity have reconfirmed the irrevocable nature of their voting rights and while they say they endorse the LOL offer, they understand that on Touchstone can release their votes from their irrevocable status by allowing the deal to lapse, take it we will need to see the response RNS from TXP to see what they plan to do...

A lot can happen between now and the 31st Jan '25, til then the TRIN stock will be dangling in the wind, thanks to our reneging BoDs...

Well looks like Trinity have reconfirmed the irrevocable nature of their voting rights and while they say they endorse the LOL offer, they understand that on Touchstone can release their votes from their irrevocable status by allowing the deal to lapse, take it we will need to see the response RNS from TXP to see what they plan to do...

I will take it from that you will be voting against the irrevocable votes of the board then... No one said you were one dimensional I just said we do not share the same timeframe for this deal. In terms of TXP if you think they will walk away then you are playing this right, I on the other hand do not think they will walk away as they have put a lot into this deal and TRIN BoD want to line their fat pockets at the cost of longer term shareholder value in my view, but good luck with your view and I will hope for good luck with mine :-)

Not upset at all, think your response shows that you only think 1 course is available, whereas clearly from TXP press release this morning that option may not be available to TRIN BoDs, time will tell on that one, it neither makes my position or your irrational, we are just thinking different outcomes are better, mainly I would suggest as you want something in the short term (68.05p) and I want something in the longer term (150p +), different needs different views that is all...

Over 90% of your fellow shareholders disagreed with you at the official vote on the TXP deal, so who has a clue now dude :-)

Enjoy the golf, no one is shooting any messengers, just as I thought you would want, responding to the issues you raised but hey ho each to their own eh :-)

The clause is there that is the fact, an irrevocable 40% is not there for discussion, the TRIN BoD knew this was the case, this shriek of a team who has had their hands in the cookie jar too long and want another dip before their show is over, good luck to them, clearly they give little thought to their shareholders who voted over 90% for the TXP deal, that should say it all :-)

Yeah Rio Tinto, develops DLE, wow breakthru, know of any companies doing this, while Rio Tinto are developing the process Cleantech have already produced more than a tonne of material and processed it, won't hold my breath for the Rio investigations thanks...