RE: From TOT on iii13 Jan 2019 10:25
The main reason for the Claim of Damages against hope was I think very likely to null & void the Default then at least restructure the deal on the Loan Notes in Frr's favour.
Otherwise what would be the point of just going for the damages of $56M, but losing an asset worth $Bs of which is clear that is not what Frr are thinking on.
Obviously Frr will/have likely have some of the $60M to use to pay off the Loan Notes, if needed.
Now we wait on the hearing this coming Thursday & see what comes out of it.