Member Info for Apre

Mr A,

Intellect - lightweight
Moral fibre - lacking
Objectivity - low and very variable
Patience - erratic
Respect for people who are better educated than him, have more vision and who run multi-million, multi-faceted companies in exceptional circumstances - zero.

Another good post there, from CO.

That's the viewpoint from which to look at Avacta. The whining, short-term flakes just do not, or cannot, get it. It's the BIGGER picture we need to be looking at. Once we see that, things become clearer and more positive.

Y'just need the minerals to get you through the noise of the uninformed, the weak and the dishonest.

Good post Codejunkie, well said.

These whining cry babies who come on here bleating about imagined problems don't just show their lack of knowledge and insight, they demonstrate their pitiful weakness as human beings. Embarrassing to witness.

Good post Muck, well done. One of the few well written, well researched pieces we have seen.

Jimmy, . . . hilarious.

Really, side-splitting . . . how do you do it?

Jimmy, it may be possible that a reader might be impressed with your analysis, as clearly you are very intelligent. If I may make so bold , however, to point out that despite your high intelligence and analytical skills, after eighteen months of us discussing this share on this BB, you are still spelling Affimers wrongly.

Oh, I apologise, did I say your are intelligent . . . sorry I meant thick as mince.

So Ray, when you're cruising Pattaya Beach . . . are you pitching or catching?

"Well, here I am." . . . truth is, you never actually went away . . . did you Ndn?

My word, to wait six months to reactivate your old account in an effort to appear as the hard done to victim, limping back into the arena to champion his cause (whatever the eff you imagine that is) . . . it's just too sad. Really, it's awful.

Here, here, very good post CO . . . lucid, reasoned analysis. As such, makes arriving at a conclusion so much easier. Mine is, hold steady under the short term volatility. The bigger picture is getting clearer, and bigger, all the time.

Excellent post Energyshares . . . sanity prevails.

Yep allahFuk, but it says much more about the "half-baked trolls, loons, trolloons, circus clowns, snake-oil salesmen, itinerant beggars and thieves . . . and incontinent whining brats," of which you are one of lowest and saddest examples.

Grufell,

Whatever you imagine the 'content' of your posts is, you just come across as a whining baby girl. Jeez, have you no shame, presenting yourself in this way? I shudder at the thought of what type of weakling a man has to be to whinge like you do.

As for, "What have any of this lot achieved" . . . if you can't be bothered to read the website, the RNS's and watch the presentations then fine, you will never know the answer to your own question. Personally, I wouldn't entertain you by offering an explanation . . . you don't deserve it. You give no respect so why should you be treated with respect? You are not fit to walk in the shadow of Dr Smith and his team and yet they have put a lot of money in your pocket . . . if you actually hold shares. Or did you make that up?

Have some courage. Have some standards . . . grow a pair, then sell up and disappear.

Steady on AgentB . . . there are sewer rats out there that might take offence . . .

First identified in Peru? Surely 'llama' variant . . . can be identified by a 'spit' test . . .

Ole.

Thanks for that Doze.

I and others have said before, that there are some who can see and interpret the bigger picture and some who can't. Even if we (certainly I) can't fully understand every snippet of research that appears on the BB, at least we can see that each of the snippets helps to fill in the missing bits of the bigger picture. It would be stating the obvious to say that there is clearly way more to Avacta than the current Covid excitement (and long may that continue btw) but what I do think we can now see, is that the 'bigger picture' is getting bigger all the time.

I do feel that investment returns aside, we are witnessing something quite awesome developing here. Genuinely disruptive. Dr Smith's ambitions to put Avacta up there with the likes of Roche, AZ et al, are beginning to look pretty achievable and perhaps in the space of just a few years. Mind boggling.

In very broad brush terms, at the moment the emerging story is the FDA rejection of Innova, in the face of UK Gov support of Innova, in spite of it's poor performance in the real world and it's skullduggery in providing its credentials - disgraceful enough.

But surely, the next big question, the real issue, has got to be how 'Innova' were out of the starting blocks in Wuhan before the gun was fired everywhere else.

Where's the "News of the Screws" when you need 'em?

Very impressive posts, Bella and Radiagreen. Thank you.

I have to say, a person can think themselves quite bright and well-informed . . . and then you read things like that. Man but those boffins are clever. As a layman, I'm getting the Affimers used "in humans" idea but I have to admit I don't fully understand all the implications.

On a more sanguine note, how do you begin to evaluate how a patent like that might be monetized and what it might be worth?

One for you chaps perhaps . . . Doze, Ophidian, Ben to the power of four et al . . . no, baby beta, not you. Please not you . . .

Scardey, thanks for that posting that, a good read. Enlightening and frightening in equal measure.

The exposure of this cluster eff is starting to gain traction now. (Not least due to the efforts of some of the stalwarts on this BB.) I can imagine a few bods in Whitehall and Porton Down are already getting twitchy, prepping their cover stories for when it hits the fan.

Looks like IG have lifted the 'closing only' message.

Confirmation anyone?

With your slippery semantics, snake-oil salesman verbal gymnastics and tediously long sermons, you come across as a fundamentally dishonest person; out to line his own pockets on the misfortune of others, which he has helped to create.

I look forward to skipping past your next 500 words vacuous, negative monologue.