Member Info for Andym123

French research? More weight for France to be an early mover on SNG.

Superb- just keeps stacking up.

I respect anybody’s right to make their own decision on taking one of the vaccines.
I am reticent about taking medicine willy nilly and if you read the packaging they invariably warn of a spectrum of side effects ranging from minor, moderate to even fatal.
But in this case guessing your age range which might have a big baring I would simply say absolutely your choice but risk to benefit?

Great work all.
Mabs like Regeneron seem relatively effective but their Achilles seems to be how specific they are.
Anybody an idea how long they take to rework against new strains?

Just trying to identify the best MP to dodge and confuse the issue.
My guess is we are given an unrelated lecture about vaccine success :-(

Worthy of a lot more exposure.
First France then the world!
Anybody from SNG care to confirm or deny or is everybody furiously busy ramming product into lorries ?
What a nice thought :-)

Great stuff.
Anybody from SNG care to comment ?

Thanks Agent that has really helped.

The key issue ‘should soon be available in France in this indication.’
Literal translation leaves room for interpretation sounds a bit Eric Cantonna.
But very intriguing.

Anybody else trying to understand the credibility of the reported French Story?

Has it been confirmed that the French Health Minister was talking about SNG or are we hoping he was referring to SNG?
Seems like it has not gone away but is there anything in it? Thanks in advance.

The good doctor saying quite clearly SNG was effectively ignored after phase 2 when we warranted emergency approval and larger study backing.

We didn’t have big Pharmaceutical & political backing but hopefully that’s about to change.

Ideally more than one pharma will come knocking and give us a price we can be happy with. I would be happy to multi-bag with a takeover and have global success if that’s what it takes to stop being overlooked.

It has just not as we probably expected.

Inertia and finely balanced but the scales will tip in our favour when confidence returns. The good thing for me is this company is pushing on and letting investors know, the share price will eventually reflect this.

The entry forms were carefully checked and scrutinised.

The Authorities have just released details of other infected passengers, they are looking to trace namely

‘Big Ears,Lord Lucan and Noddy.’

Nice one.
The Standford doctor was joining the dots. More of this and happy days.

So going back to the original question which was wether 100% of people needed vaccination. Clearly there is antibody resistance similar or better than that offered by vaccination.
The chances of getting reinfected a second time are a lot lower (83% ?).

But then living as a student and working in a hospital setting where sick people end up with Coronavirus there is fair to say a greater risk of getting reinfected given the increased viral loads etc maybe?

Prof sorry I may have missed your point.

I have never heard this assertion from a ‘Dr’ before is it corroborated anywhere ?

I think Baffyman was simply asking a legitimate question?
I have tried to get you to reflect on a tendency to go in guns blazing and **** folk off but it obviously hasn’t worked.

One of my sons who is a med student was pondering the same question just last night. He’s had the virus twice and as a result will now have developed some level of antibody resistance. He is a very bright guy and was unsure what if any benefit having a vaccine would have which is only trying to mimic what his body will have already done ?
So yes is it sensible to vaccinate 100% of the population?

A many legged proposition- the best kind.

Any one becoming widely successful will create huge revenue but multiples being successful, would be colossal. Patience required.

I may be deluding myself but statistically I should be low risk but that is an unknown.

What is also unclear is the efficacy of all the different vaccines depending which data you believe.

So despite probable limited use to me I will get vaccinated on the off chance it stops me spreading it to someone else for whom it might lead to life changing debility or death.
That’s my risk analysis. It might help me or even might not be great be for me but there’s a fair chance it might unintentionally stop me harming others.

Joey holey guacamole. Thinking.... need to digest this....

Try saying it with a Clouseau accent sounds passable Gallic.
But I think they would rather rub garlic in their eyes than save France with a very British product. Can’t see it.