Member Info for AML_007

C2645sg – 29/08/24 – “Noah, I was bang on, did you miss the company raising 135m in early august?”

- - - - - - - - - -

@c2645sg – Is “bang on” another English phrase that you use, but don’t really understand? Or are you really starting to believe your own (false) self-generated hype? < Roll Eyes >

As you were initially warning us multiple times that AML didn’t have enough cash to cover its liabilities, suggesting it required a cash raise to avoid bankruptcy. https://www.ukliquidators.org.uk/company-debt-advice/what-does-it-mean-when-your-business-is-bankrupt

c2645sg – 13/05/24 – “229 (cash left) - 150 Q2 (cash burn for Q2) = 79 million. That is not enough to cover all liabilities. Cash raise. Incoming. Driven.”

- - - - - - - - - -

Then you stopped talking about liabilities and started including AML’s credit facility.

c2645sg – 03/07/24 – “I said out of cash, and they are. They are using the £170m credit line… It's not rocket surgery. They are not cash raising because they are tapping a 170m loan.”

18/07/24 – Quote: “When AML run out of money, they tap the credit card. Simple.”

- - - - - - - - - -

However, you only ever talked about an equity cash raise, including speculation on the CR SP.

c2645sg – 08/05/24 – “Cash raise will be under £1 for sure now, probably around 50p depending on how much they need.”

13/05/24 – “The last time shorts increased they was a cash raise on the way....”

09/06/24 – “Will people take profits, or gamble on an imminent cash raise?”

10/06/24 – “Was this recent rise to enable a cash raise?”

- - - - - - - - - -

Note – The above quotes are just a small fraction of the HUGE number of cash raise posts you made.

Given the fact you never mentioned a private debt placing once, how can you claim you were ‘bang on’?

Have a good day everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

PS – “rocket surgery” = #NeverNotFunny ;-)

#MoreComedyGold

- - - - - - - - - -

c2645sg – 29/08/24 – “Are you sure you worked in the City? Who did you work for?”

@c2645sg – So, you refuse to say if you still have the AML shares you posted about holding & buying on here, or provide a link to any posts telling us you sold those shares, but you expect @ratty1967 to tell you who they are in real life and where they worked? #DoubleStandards

- - - - - - - - - -

c2645sg – 29/08/24 – “Let me see if anyone has heard of you.”

@c2645sg – How exactly are you planning to do that? How many people do you personally know that work “in the City” and how do you know them? Because, if you don’t/didn’t work in the City yourself, why would you expect anyone to tell you anything about someone they worked with? #Columbo

- - - - - - - - - -

c2645sg – 29/08/24 – “Sure, you’re an ex city boy who comes on a free chat board, haha. We all believe you.”

@c2645sg – So, no one who has worked in the City will use a free chat board, but you have the ability to ask around in the City to cross-check @ratty1967’s story, without being a City/ex-City person yourself using a free chat board? #Couldn’tMakeThisUp

- - - - - - - - - -

Happy Friday everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

With apologies to Shaboozey… “Oh my, good Lord”. ;-)

- - - - - - - - - -

c2645sg – 28/08/24 – “AML raised £135m of cash from new bonds on August 2nd, only 3 days out. Yet still he can't admit I was correct, again.”

Why are you still trying to claim you called you called this cash raise correctly? When you repeatedly warned about an equity cash raise and never once mentioned a private debt placing?

c2645sg – 08/05/24 – “Cash raise will be under £1 for sure now, probably around 50p depending on how much they need.”

- - - - - - - - - -

c2645sg – 28/08/24 – Quote: “Hence why Paul AML007 and others on here have to trade this to try to make cash back. Not enough confidence it will get back to £15 organically.”

What are you talking about? I’ve already made profit & shown you how. Why mention £15, when AML’s Market Cap. peaked with an @SP of £3.96 in Jul.23 (equivalent to £3.54 today, with 825m shares). Why do you refuse to take into account the impact of AML’s 4:1 rights issue @ £1.03 in 2022?

- - - - - - - - - -

c2645sg – 28/08/24 – Quote: “I've been calling this down from £20, look back at my history on here.”

@c2645sg – You keep asking people to look back at your posting history, but you then change the subject when anyone does. < Roll Eyes > If you were calling £20 as the top, then why were you buying at £19, after £20 had been reached, and waiting to buy more if the price dropped lower?

c2645sg – 11/06/21 – “Nice, hit my limit order of 1910. Keeping some in reserve in case it goes lower.”

Your photographic memory is really letting you down these days, as you must remember your posting history with regards to claims of calling the SP has been highlighted to you, multiple times before.

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.asp?ShareTicker=AML&share=Aston-Martin-Lagonda&page=2&thread=16EB0448-6072-4769-97F8-D38F96A7BA54

- - - - - - - - - -

As always, so much nonsense and so little time to deal with it all. ;-)

Have a good day everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

PS - @c2645sg - You still haven’t answered any of the following: Still think 10%+ for 5 years = 100%? Still think adding together dollar amounts & sterling amounts gives a total in pounds? Still not prepared to show us your evidence that Stroll is the bondholder?

@c2645sg changing the subject again I see. ;-)

Still think 10%+ for 5 years = 100%?

Still think adding together dollar amounts & sterling amounts gives a total in pounds?

Still not prepared to show us your evidence that Stroll is the bondholder?

Have a good day everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

PS - @NoahsArk is correct, the AML shorts only increased for a few days and then dropped back.

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareShortPositions.html?shareprice=AML&share=Aston-Martin-Lagonda

C2645sg – 23/08/24 – Quote: “Fanboy simpleton seems to have forgotten about the last 5 years of bond debt at up to 15%, Why don't you go away and calculate how much it's been since Stroll bought AML? Then you'll find it it's far more than 100%, much more, especially if he reinvested the interest every time they raise cash and new debt. Like last month. And thanks for pointing out that borrowing £135m is costing them ANOTHER £78.8m in interest alone.”

- - - - - - - - - -

@c2645sg – Oh dear, so you are back name calling, just weeks after you posted this? < Roll Eyes >

c2645sg – 09/08/24 – “Calling people names and lying just makes you look foolish.”

- - - - - - - - - -

@c2645sg - I haven’t forgotten the previous bonds & I don’t need to add stuff up either. As your actual quoted statement of “making 10%+ every year, effectively doubling his money in 5 years” remains factually incorrect, despite your best back-tracking efforts to belatedly include other stuff to make it add up (E.g. there is no mention of ‘reinvesting the interest’ in your original quoted statement).

You’ve also added a US Dollar & UK Sterling amount together to give the wrong interest total. ;-)

And you still haven’t proven Stroll is the bond holder, with that thing you previously called ‘evidence’.

So why not deal with your own posts before applying your hypocritical double standards to others?

Have a good long weekend everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

C2645sg – 22/08/24 – Quote: “Because Stroll and chums are the bondholders, making 10%+ every year, effectively doubling his money in 5 years.”

- - - - - - - - - -

@c2645sg - If your maths is this bad, no wonder you don’t understand AML averages. < Roll Eyes >

Or is it the technical English “effectively doubling” that you don’t fully understand? ;-)

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/AML/announcement-of-successful-private-debt-placing-hshq99jpjyjeiyw.html

$90m @ 10% x 5 years = $45m interest = 50% of original loan

£65m x 10.375% x 5 years = £33.7m interest = 52%

Whilst the interest is a LOT of money, it is not a 100% return, or effectively doubling, in 5 years, is it? (The interest would need to be 20% over 5 years, or 10% over 10 years to achieve this.)

Can you provide your source for who the bondholders are, based on your own high/double standard?

c2645sg – 14/12/22 - Quote: “When you state things then fail to provide evidence, you lose all credibility… That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

Happy Friday everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

@Son_of_Swiss – I’m noticing a recurring theme here. ;-)

“…these days it’s a car brand transformed, upping the ante in two key areas, luxury and performance, so that buyers won’t have their heads turned by the likes of Bentley on one hand or Porsche and McLaren on the other.”

Have a good day everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

@Son_of_Swiss – Thanks for the link, which ties in with what @MarkPatrick wrote back in May and what Harry Metcalfe talks about in his Harry’s Garage videos, the current AML line up is their best ever. It will be interesting to see if they can crank up production/sale volumes in H2 2024. Cheers, Paul. :)

- - - - - - - - - -

MarkPatrick – 18/05/24 – Quote: “…debt has increased and servicing/reducing it is going to continue to challenge the business. However, as a result of the investment in the business (debt and equity), the product lineup is excellent and people want to buy them. Risks remain and will do for some time yet, but this business now has serious potential provided it can deliver on volume and margin and cash conversion. Time to look forward, not back.”

C2645sg – 14/08/24 – Quote: “I posted it to see if there might be some intelligent discussion around whether AML were liable for the £15k payment per car, or if they were exempt due to being a low volume producer, but I should have known better.”

- - - - - - - - - -

#MoreComedyGold

@c2645sg – So, your first post, after I pointed out the errors in your previous post, was nothing more than a link to a video entitled “Why EV uptake in UK is stalling and the government must abandon its ZEV mandate” and you expected others to ‘somehow’ know the video was to start a “discussion around whether AML were liable for the £15k payment per car”? Well, why didn’t you just say that? < Roll Eyes >

Top Tip – Add some words to the link, so people who can’t read minds know why you posted it? ;-)

E.g. What do you think of Harry’s Valour question: “Is this the greatest driver's Aston of them all?” - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNZHoo2D_WI

Or, do you think that Harry reviews of the current AML line up are fair?

Vantage - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUsE0QSYZNc

DB12 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-jYWLehd6M

DBX707 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ohR3PgMvRs

- - - - - - - - - -

As for an intelligent ZEV discussion. A quick Google search will tell you that “Manufacturers that sell fewer than 2500 cars in the UK per year are exempt from the UK ZEV mandate”. AML sold 1,141 vehicles in the UK in 2023, so have some headroom to double UK sales and still not breach this limit.

https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/electric-cars/zero-emission-vehicle-zev-mandate

There is also a complicated trading scheme, where ICE manufacturers can get ‘credits’ from EV manufacturers. Given EV maker Lucid has a stake in ICE maker AML, that might be an option (DYOR).

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65e069a9b8da63b345c8627f/vets-how-to-comply.pdf

However, AML and Lucid have not got together with the ZEV trading scheme in mind, this arrangement is the cornerstone of AML’s entry into the EV market, which has only been delayed, not abandoned.

Amedeo Felisa – “This long-term relationship will help propel Aston Martin's high-performance electrification strategy, as the Company develops alternatives to the Internal Combustion Engine with a blended drivetrain approach between 2025 and 2030, including PHEV and BEV, with a clear plan to have a line-up of electric sports cars and SUVs. With Aston Martin's technical partnerships now in place, the Company's first battery electric vehicle (BEV) is now targeted for launch in 2026, benefitting from the very best high-performance technologies available.”

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/AML/preliminary-results-year-ended-31-december-2023-55pucpqgk5ljumn.html

Hope that helps, cheers, Paul. :)

Part 2

Fact #4 – @c2645sg, less than two weeks ago you posted this… 02/08/24 – Quote: “This is about making money.” So how can my faith in AML have wavered when I sold some shares, when selling shares to ‘make money’ clearly marks the point when my faith in AML was finally rewarded? The faith that remained through all the grim years and your “Priced for its 8th bankruptcy now” de-ramping / scaremongering (where if I’d sold then, I would have made a huge loss). What are you talking about?

It is not my fault you keep focusing on one old quote of mine from 2021 whilst completely ignoring everything else I’ve posted. I’ve repeatedly explained that 2022, with the 4:1 Rights Issue @ £1.03, was the year that mattered. As this changed everything & I went from being underwater in Sep.22 to being in profit by Jul.23. Why do you struggle to understand this? I even spelt out the maths & what I did here:

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.html?ShareTicker=AML&share=Aston-Martin-Lagonda&thread=9FBFFE45-270E-49F7-B2E1-34BD119991A4

- - - - -

Fact #5 – I regularly posted on here AML’s market cap, given the changes in both the SP & number of shares in circulation. AML’s MCap for the Stroll era peaked in Jul.23 at £2.9bn, when the SP was £3.96. This was higher than the £2.5bn MCap achieved in Feb.21, when the SP was £22. But, what you now seem to be suggesting, is that selling shares at close to their all time peak is not a good idea. Really?

I still hold AML shares and if you spent more time reading what I actually wrote and less time making things up, you wouldn’t have missed the BIG clue I gave you to the average price of those shares. ;-)

- - - - -

Have a good day everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

@advocate1973 – As you know, ‘Brandolini’s Law’ means it takes more words to dis-prove nonsense, than it takes to make stuff up in the first place. Still, I’m sure you’ll find something to enjoy. ;-)

- - - - -

c2645sg – 12/08/24 – Quote: “So you made a point of sharing every single purchase on here, but sell on the quiet and expect everyone to believe you. Your faith in Stroll didn't waver at £14 like YOU said it would, but it did waver when you sold in 2023, real classy. Good to know the truth now, probably best we just ignore each other from now on, it's utterly pointless now we all know you defend the company while selling shares on the quiet.”

- - - - -

@c2645sg – Oh dear, you really are confusing your made up world with my reality…

Fact #1 - I actually made a point of NOT sharing every single purchase on here, due to your hypocrisy & rather unhealthy obsession with my AML holding (when yours is “none of my business”). E.g.

AML_007 – 25/03/23 - Quote: “I stopped posting details on here. Instead, I wrote things like this: “I’m also still here and topping up every now and then too (as funds allow).” A 100% truthful statement that deliberately didn’t include two things: - Total number of shares I bought. - The price I paid for each of those shares. I also didn’t post what I did, or did not do, about the RI.”

- - - - -

Fact #2 – I did NOT sell on the quiet and just because you said it twice doesn’t make it correct once! I’ve even offered to provide you links to my posts on a quid pro quo basis (this offer still stands BTW). Given your bombastic reply above, surely you didn’t sell your own AML shares “on the quiet”?

AML_007 – 27/04/24 – Quote: “@c2645sg – Tell you what, if you show me your “I sold” posts, then I’ll show you mine. ;-)”

- - - - -

Fact #3 – Your photographic memory has let you down (again). As the £14 you’ve used is actually from a quote confirming my faith in AML was still there. ;-)

AML_007 – 26/11/21 - Quote: “Back in May 21, I thought a £15 SP would break my faith in Stroll, Moers, etc. But today, six months later, my faith is still there and not deterred by the current £14 SP… Back in May 21, I wasn't expecting to reach 2 years of WFH in Mar.22 either.”

I then continued to confirm I was still holding AML, despite the SP continuing to fall. E.g.

AML_007 – 06/03/22 – Quote: “Well, I’m still here and haven’t started selling, despite my (theoretical) losses running into £000s…. Given @c2645sg’s apparent concern, I should add that I did also top up at times, rather than sell… There is not £1 that I have put into AML that I need any time soon, so I am happy to wait and see. Am I happy that the SP is where it is? No, of course not. Am I somehow gripped with fear? No, why would I be? I am certainly not sleeping in a basement during air raids, or watching tanks roll down my street. And I am

C2645sg – 10/08/24 – Quote: “Triggered. You of all people should know what underwater is. ;) What’s your average here Paul?”

- - - - - - - - - -

Triggered? Calmly asking you how @jk290483 was “now underwater”, given their AML £1.375 entry point, or asking about your definitions of ramping/de-ramping, hardly counts as triggered now, does it?

Yes, I do know what being underwater is. For a shareholding, it means that the value of the shares you own is less than what you paid for them. Without a doubt, there was a time when I was seriously underwater with AML, which I’ve never denied. The thing is, and this is the key part that you perpetually fail to understand, at the time I sold AML shares in 2023, the shares I sold were worth more than I’d paid for all my AML shares, which is known as making a profit. #Simples

However, in terms of being ‘triggered’, you are the one desperately trying to get out of the very corner your own 2024 error posts have painted you into, by repeatedly asking me a question that I’ve politely explained I’ll not answer directly due to your hypocrisy. Which also confirms, for all to see, that you are clearly the Troll poster that you doth protest too much about. #Ironic ;-)

- - - - - - - - - -

Have a good day everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

@c2645sg – My question was why did you claim @jk290483 was “now underwater”?

As your definition of ramping is all part of your double standards on here. E.g. Why doesn’t your ‘I won’t be selling ANY of the considerable amount I have for at least 3 years or anything under £30’ post count as BS ramping? Or why doesn’t your “Priced for its 8th bankruptcy now” post count as BS de-ramping?

Your double standards also saw you post this yesterday: “Calling people names and lying just makes you look foolish. Which you obviously don’t mind.” When you were the one who called Lance Stroll something so offensive your whole post was deleted by the LSE Chat moderators. #FoolishIndeed

Have a good weekend everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

C2645sg – 09/08/24 – Quote: “Beware of the ramper who is now underwater...”

@c2645sg – Save yourself! You have just quoted @jk290483 saying they are in @137.50p and now you want to claim they are a ramper who is under water. Why? Because the AML SP spent a short time today below 136p? By your logic, they must now be ‘quids in’ when the SP closed at 139p. < Roll Eyes >

C2645sg – 08/08/24 – Quote: “Still laughing my ass off at Paul aml007 saying his faith in Stroll would be lost at £14… now it’s under 1/10th of that and he still thinks he is a decent investor who should be listened to. Guys like that never admit they are wrong. Bet they are selling when they type all that BS. :)”

- - - - - - - - - -

@c2645sg – If you think my old £15 quote is funnier than your old ‘waiting for £30’ one, laugh away. ;-)

But, at least admit you don’t have a photographic memory. Because I’ve covered my old quote multiple times before (whereas you now appear to be in denial that you were ever an AML investor). Things changed and I adjusted my approach to match. I’ve also explained that my AML experience was similar to de Picciotto / St.James, buying shares at high & low prices and selling for a profit in 2023. (When, unlike you, I did post I was selling on here.) Why ignore these facts if you “never forgot”? < Roll Eyes >

All you can do is make things up (“Hitting the AML sell button in front of his soggy cornflakes.”) in a feeble attempt to distract from me pointing out the errors and hypocrisy of your own posts. Forget old quotes from 2021, here are just some of your 2024 ‘highlights’: 2023 annual sales forecast of 6,160 sales vs. actual sales of 6,620; 8 x 2023 Profit Warnings, but no profit warning issued; Fulsome refinancing means “cash raise or debt for equity swap”, which it didn’t; “No way AML can refinance on better terms” when they could; ‘2024 AGM Resolutions mean Stroll taking AML Private, but same resolutions in 2021, 2022 & 2023; No ‘cash raise within 4 months’ (before 05/07/24); Equity cash raise (“Cash raise will be under £1 for sure now, probably around 50p”), when it was a private debt placing; & Nebula court case.

Anyway, it is Friday, so have a good day everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

C2645sg – 05/08/24 – Quote: “Rattled. All those words and still refusing to share your average. Perfect. I am here to stop all your idiot gamblers punting your 'buys' and sharing them on here, ramping without challenge. Job done, nobody dare post an average or any share buys. Lovely :)”

- - - - - - - - - -

@c2645sg – Rattled? Not me. After all, I’m not the one resorting to making things up, am I? Instead, I calmly used my ‘words’ to explain (again) that I don’t share my average due to your hypocrisy. You understand hypocrisy, right? It means you can’t expect anyone to answer your questions, if you will not answer theirs (Do you hold AML shares? When did you sell?). Yet you think it is because “nobody dare”? If so, does that mean you don’t ‘dare’ to say if you hold AML, or show your ‘I’m selling’ posts on here?

But why doesn’t your prediction of a £30 AML SP count as ramping? Also, are you now saying that when you posted about your Jun.21 buys (“Nice, hit my limit order of 1910.”) you were an idiot gambler? ;-)

Finally, you seem to be claiming your intention is to stop people posting about AML buys, on an AML Share Chat, and achieving that is “Job done”. So, what kind of job is that exactly? < Roll Eyes >

Anyway, lovely day for a morning run, have a good one everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

PS - With 39 posts between Friday & Monday, you appear to meet your own definition of desperate. c2645sg – 06/07/23 – Quote: “The more someone posts on here, the more desperate they are.”

C2645sg – 04/08/24 – Quote: “Which exact bit is misinformation. Please explain your reasoning and enlighten us all?”

@c2645sg – On Friday you said AML “refused to warn the market last year”, but on Saturday, you said “I know what the definition of a profits warning is. My point is AML circumvent one by loading dealers full of DBX they can't sell, just to avoid warning sales aren't what Stroll promised.” Thereby confirming your use of the word “refused” was misinformation as, by your own words, AML didn’t need to issue one.

- - - - - - - - - -

c2645sg – 29/04/24 – Quote: “Let's keep it professional/on point and stop the conspiracy theories”

c2645sg – 03/08/24 – Quote: “did you go short and that's where your profit came from?”

Why don’t you follow your own advice for a change and “stop the conspiracy theories”? As all your speculation about what I did, when you don’t really know, also counts as posting misinformation.

- - - - - - - - - -

c2645sg – 04/08/24 – Quote: “All Paul can do is troll me over the finer details.”

So, after you posted the extra interest costs & fees associated with AML’s ‘private debt placing’, you still claim the differences between this & the equity cash raise you predicted are just “finer details”?

- - - - - - - - - -

c2645sg – 04/08/24 – Quote: “It doesn’t matter which metric you pick, this has been one of the worst financial investments in recent memory.”

@c2645sg – Does that make your post telling people to buy AML shares & hold them for 3 years/£30 SP (£1.50 post 20:1 consolidation) one of the worst pieces of investment advice in recent memory then? Are you sure you have a photographic memory and never forget? ;-)

c2645sg – 27/10/20 – Quote: “More proof that long term thinking is better than short term. Forget wave theories. Buy a company that has this kind of potential and let it run. I won’t be selling ANY of the considerable amount I have for at least 3 years or anything under £1.50.”

- - - - - - - - - -

So much nonsense, so little time. < Roll Eyes >

Have a good day everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

PS - c2645sg – 05/08/24 – Quote: “I bet AML007 is having quite a different breakfast this morning. Hitting the AML sell button in front of his soggy cornflakes.” – Why are you still making bets, when you still haven’t honoured the previous one you made on here and lost? No surprizes that you are wrong, again.

With apologies to Taylor Swift… “And the Trollers gonna Troll, Troll, Troll.” ;-)

- - - - - - - - - -

@c2645sg – I’m too scared? Oh, you are so mean to me, I must run and tell my mummy. < Roll Eyes >

Alternatively, perhaps I don’t share my average with you because, back in 2021, you said “My shareholding is none of your business AML007”. Given that you will not even say if you hold AML shares, I think you will find that the real reason I don’t share my average has more to do with your perpetual hypocrisy and less to do with the fantasies you make up about what I did or did not do. #Fact

@TheAnswerIsNo – Ah bless, you are so sweet. Still posting here, three years after you sold your AML shares for so much money, it just shows what a kind and considerate poster you are. #Hmmmm

Cheers, Paul. :)

PS - I’m heading off now in advance of the Goodwood Breakfast Club tomorrow, where me, & my car, have been invited to be on display along the Madgwick Straight from 8am to 12noon. Anyone on here who wants to say hello IRL is more than welcome (look for a very distance cousin of the DBR1).

C2645sg – 02/08/24 – Quote: “…avoid the subject of another cash raise to keep the lights on, obviously not big enough to accept I was right, again.”

@c2645sg – Are you now saying that all your multiple posts about an equity cash raise (based on references to the new equity’s SP) were actually predicting a private debt placing? #NotRight,Again

Quotes - c2645sg – 08/05/24 – “Cash raise will be under £1 for sure now, probably around 50p depending on how much they need.”

13/05/24 – “Cash raise. Incoming. Driven.”

09/06/24 – “Will people take profits, or gamble on an imminent cash raise?”

10/06/24 – “Was this recent rise to enable a cash raise?”

- - - - - - - - - -

c2645sg – 02/08/24 – Quote: “…this is a nailed on profits warning this year. Saying that, they refused to warn the market last year and came out with terrible figures instead.”

#TheGiftThatKeepsOnGiving

@c2645sg – Why do you still refuse to use the UK Stock Exchange definition of a profit warning?

AML are required by law to issue a profit warning, via RNS, if their results will be materially different to market expectations. Therefore, AML didn’t “refuse” to warn the market last year, the 2023 results were sufficiently in line with AML’s previous forecasts not to warrant a profit warning.

- - - - - - - - - -

c2645sg – 29/04/24 – Quote: “Let's keep it professional/on point and stop the conspiracy theories”

@c2645sg – Does your definition of being professional/on point include using UK share terminology correctly/in context? If so, don’t say cash raise when you mean private debt placing. Don’t say profit warning when you mean terrible figures. Don’t ignore the fact that ‘refinancing’ is defined as swapping one debt for another debt and post your own definition of refinancing as being “Cash raise or debt for equity swap. No other way… tons of dilution coming your way…” Similarly, “they refused to warn the market” is a conspiracy theory, because there was no legal requirement to issue a warning (something AML did do for their 2019 & 2021 annual accounts).

- - - - - - - - - -

Have a good weekend everyone, cheers, Paul. :)

@advocate1973 – The Nebula case is just one in a long line of things that @c2645sg has been proved wrong on, but that doesn’t stop them posting the next round of things to complain about. ;-)

So far, in just the first seven months of 2024, @c2645sg has not been “on point” about 2023 annual sales figures , 2023 profit warnings, what fulsome refinancing means, AML ability to refinancing on better terms, what AGM resolutions mean and not forgetting their personal favourite, cash raises.

Ironically, they undermine their own credibility by not acknowledging the Nebula ruling is a good thing for AML. As it was true that it was a risk for AML, although the ‘making things up’ part was not needed.

Anyway, I’ve got to go, so catch up another day, Paul. :)