RE: Forbes artical, a fair assessment of where aml is.15 Mar 2024 07:24
@c2645sg – Do you need a hug?
After all, you did say that… “The more someone posts on here, the more desperate they are.”
And your posts yesterday had such an air of desperation, that perhaps they were a cry for help?
- - - - - - - - - -
c2645sg – Quote - “Because there is not a cash raise today, you think that's it forever?”
@c2645sg – Many people, myself included, have said there ‘may’ be a cash raise in the future. DYOR
The point, which you appear to be desperately trying to avoid, is you confused refinancing with CR.
AML raised over £1.1bn with neither a cash raise, nor a debt for equity swap and zero dilution.
Can you at least acknowledge your error, before getting slightly hysterical about something else?
c2645sg – 21/02/24 - Quote: “AML have said themselves there will be a fulsome refinancing…
Cash raise or debt for equity swap. No other way… tons of dilution coming your way…”
- - - - - - - - - -
c2645sg – Quote - “Why refinance when you ended up paying more in fees than what you save?”
AML Option 1 – Refinance existing debt due to expire in 2025/26.
AML Option 2 – Replay the existing debt in full in 2025/26.
Do you really want me to spell out why Option 1 costs AML less in 2025/26 than Option 2?
- - - - - - - - - -
c2645sg – Quote – “How are they going to pay for this debt refinancing?”
@c2645sg – You asked this before & I’ve answered it before, did you even read the RNS?
RNS – Quote - “The proceeds from the offering of the Notes… will be used… to pay expenses and fees in connection with the transactions”
I also told you AML still had £106m left over from the money they raised last year to pay off debt.
https://www.astonmartin.com/-/media/corporate/documents/2023-results/aston-martin-lagonda-fy-2023-results.pdf
“Cash as at 31 December 2023 includes the remaining £106m of proceeds from August’s share placing, following the redemption of a portion of the outstanding second lien notes in November”
- - - - - - - - - -
@c2645sg – You calculated the new bond interest incorrectly, as it is neither $137m, nor £107m.
One bond is $, the other £, you have just added the 2 interest numbers together. < Roll Eyes >
@TheDuke2 explained PiK interest, highlighting how your old bond interest numbers are wrong too.
So, you posted the same mis-information four times in less than 30 minutes. #SchoolBoyErrors
- - - - - - - - - -
So many false narratives and so little time to challenge them all.
The good news is it is Friday, so have a good weekend everyone, cheers, Paul. :)
PS
Please don’t worry about my average, I’m fine & you seem to be worrying about too much as it is.