Member Info for alfresco

Actually, it was 18 email addresses! I have just emailed them all again to say that what they have been told is not true, I did not receive a reply from the CRO.

Stas......in my email I wrote a lot of my own words and included your entire email in a different colour. I sent it to 15 email addresses from the court service list, and so far have had 5 read receipts including Kravitz and Milholland. It looks like your email has had a result!

In my email today I reminded Kravitz that although he is the restructuring officer, he is a director of the company and has a legal obligation to act in the shareholders' interests. That he is not doing, and so he should be added to the list for the class action.

Yankee99v2, I just had the read receipts to show the emails had been opened. No replies at all yet.

So far out of the 15 emails I sent I have had 5 read receipts, including Kravitz and Milholland.

Lloydy1066.......did you hear back from the CAG about the website? I haven't yet.

'Lots of email addresses on the second link, Stas. I have copied my email to most of them apart from the secured creditors. 15 in total. There are 2 court ones at the bottom, they will have my email too. Maybe others can do the same?'

2 read receipts so far out of 15 sent! I Jacobs Ryan and one Cassells

Lots of email addresses on the second link, Stas. I have copied my email to most of them apart from the secured creditors. 15 in total. There are 2 court ones at the bottom, they will have my email too. Maybe others can do the same?

I have sent a long email to Kravitz, and copied it to the SAG.

'I’d set this up for my retirement (I’m 59). That’s out of the window now for the time being at least. '

Lloydy1066.......Exactly the same here, aged 66. Everything I had went in to this, 150kGBP, and I was running my business here in Spain down towards retirement. Now I have to reverse that, and am having to look at ways to do that. We don't have the monthly income to survive unless I can rekindle the business, so long hours now, plus forever wondering if we will ever see our money back. I guess I will have to work until I drop. Oh, and my wife does not yet know about this........

RBM, email just sent.

'RBMInvest why not use alfresco potential with offering coplshareholders.com website and use this as a landing page to promote the "true picture of COPL’s assets".

We could produce a very attractive bill board for prospective bidders with proper facts.

Then add link to this to your reaching out emails.

I'm talking the major bullet points we need to get across, some decent related images a nice css theme. We could have it there in a few days.

Alfresco would that be possible at your end, we can always update as needed for an accurate unfolding picture?'

TrustSerpico, I am happy to provide the domain name but have no experience in building a suitable website.

For amusement: https://www.britishbulls.com/SignalPage.aspx?lang=en&Ticker=COPL.L Stay Long.......lol

Stas, I bought the domain name coplshareholders.com when all this kicked off. The SAG said they already had something organised, but it didn't happen. If you want to use this I can supply it for a website to put everything out there.

Good move, Stas......This also needs to be sent to the judge or court if that is possible.

So:

On 4th Jan, RNA said that there were 1,344,370,498 shares in issue.

By 12th January, Anavio had shorted.....sold.....49.3% of these, which they did not own: 662,774,655.

Then on 16th January, they received 1,312,232,633 shares in the financing deal.

They then closed the shorts with part of this issue, and by 16th Jan a TR1 said that Anavio owned 649,638,786 shares.

So there is it in black and white, legally required declarations. There is a slight discrepancy of 180,808 shares which I am sure is because the shorts figure of 49.3% is probably a rounded figure.

And on 12th January COPL announced it did not know of a reason for the share price movement.

So surely an official body can look at these figures? If the terms of the bond were 'no shorting', then what is the penalty for breaching the terms of the bonds? Especially as they had been doing it the whole time they owned the bonds? This must be great ammunition for our case?

Https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/COPL/share-price-movement-wfynaxvymjadykr.html 12th January.......they were closing shorts, maybe, and caused the price rise. Definitely insider trading, 4 days later they closed the financing.

No wonder there was a lot of buying recently.

Thanks RBM....you have seen the offers of extra help from other KCs below?

I have asked on here a couple of times about the denial of the GM, what happened?

I am sure that all bondholders would be keen to see not only a return of the bond amounts but a return to shareholders as they own a large proportion of the shares. If they get a return on their holdings then so do we. Let's hope there are companies waiting for the opportunity to bid a sensible amount and take it away from whoever has been promised the assets.