We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Vladyslav, if you have been watching this forum over the last year or two you will know that we have had many new members and 'sleepers' who have started posting with less than good intentions, mostly to steer the conversation in one direction or to simply disrupt. I hope that you are not one of these but it does seem strange that you have suddenly posted, seemingly with a lot of knowledge, many here will be wary, of that I am certain. Most of the problems have been eradicated by the in depth investigations recently carried out in to posters on these boards, and almost all have now stopped posting for fear of the legal repurcussions! Anyway, I was just saying what others will be thinking, and I guess if you have not been watching you will have missed all the issues.
Stas......'Morning Alfresco, fyi, I have sent both the original Kravitz letter and the final completed oil company marketing letter to the CAG for their reference and use as appropriate. The list of oil companies I have amassed have been from sharescope plus (plus does not have Canadian companies, anyone with sharescope pro can use the data mining facility to construct the Canadian company list).
I have not heard from the CAG for a couple of days thus I expect they are super busy. I will provide the list of companies to them as an excel. Hopefully they can share either through X or facebook or, our website when up and running. Failing that I'll post as best I can here.'
I am sure that we need to get on with everything we can. I would be happy to talk on email, if you want?
Vladyslav, usually this group will disregard posts from a brand new member. Even though you have been a member for several years your first post ever was yesterday. I am aware that your posts are in our direction, maybe you can enlighten us as to where you are coming from?
'The company is withholding critical information from its shareholders, such as release of December 2022 Ryder Scott report; information regarding the reason behind the suspension of JV negotiations and evaluation report recently conducted by a third party. The Affidavit states that it is not being released for competition reasons. '
There now needs to be competition for us, but the sharks that want our assets on the cheap don't want it.
Ok, shaa, we just don't want to miss this window to act. It is just that on 20th January I had an email from CAG saying:
'Good Morning
My apologies, but unbeknown to me a member of our team had already secured a domain name to work with - sorry, but there’s so much happening at once that I’d missed that.
Really do appreciate your offer though.
Regards'
That's almost 2 months ago.........now is a crucial time, in my opinion, to get anyone and everyone on board!
Lloydy, I have the domain name, when you are ready we can be in contact. BUT....Shaa implied at 08.52 that the CAG are now doing this, can we clarify this before you spend time on it? Shaa, is this definite? Do they need the domain that I purchased a few weeks ago, coplshareholders.com? It is with GoDaddy.
Stas.....busy this morning but please can you include mention of the carbon capture potential which may be worth more than the oil? I will look again later, then send to my 18 recipients. 10 now confirmed receipt of yesterday's email and 3 so far for this morning's one. I will also send your earlier one when I have time.
Did you get a reply from the CAG about the website? I haven't yet. I think that a simple website will all the info in one place would be a good weapon, the link could be sent to everyone involved, including the press. As you know, I bought the domain name a while ago. I am sure Stas could fill it up very quickly!
Stas......in my email I wrote a lot of my own words and included your entire email in a different colour. I sent it to 15 email addresses from the court service list, and so far have had 5 read receipts including Kravitz and Milholland. It looks like your email has had a result!
In my email today I reminded Kravitz that although he is the restructuring officer, he is a director of the company and has a legal obligation to act in the shareholders' interests. That he is not doing, and so he should be added to the list for the class action.