Member Info for alfresco

First questions:

Good morning Noah

Thank you for your reply and the information you have supplied. I am sure that you will expect more questions, so here are some initial ones:

What was the reason for the action group's general meeting request to be declined? In what way was the application 'deficient'? This meeting would have been very important for shareholders rights.

In an announcement on 12th September 2022 the company referred to an independent reserves report prepared by Ryder Scott certifying the 2P reserves at a figure of $492m. This report was compliant with Canadian regulations. Why has this report been omitted from the reports you have so far published? Surely this valuation is extremely relevant to any bidding process?

It has to be assumed that the NDA relating to the JV expired with the cancellation of the proposal, so why have we not been informed of the details of the proposal? Surely a JVP who takes more than a year looking at the proposal would not have done so if there was no value? This definitely seems very odd, and we should be given more information. Is there a plan for the JVP to get the assets at a low price at the shareholders' expense?

Today we have seen a series of historic TR1s relating to trading in the COPL shares by Anavio. These TR1s, if issued on time, would have influenced investors' actions. The first TR1 declares that the company was notified of the trades on 10th July 2023, and the market was only notified today. It is very clear from the new shorting information released last week and now these TR1s, that Anavio, and possibly COPL's directors, have been able to completely destroy the value of the company whilst shareholders were kept in the dark. In some of today's TR1s it is stated that Anavio owned 100% of the common stock, clearly an impossible situation. On 29th December they supposedly had an actual position of 121.56%, so clearly something very underhand was taking place, and over a period of time shareholders were being fed news which encouraged them to hold or add to their positions. It is obvious that Anavio needed buyers and it is now clear why the share price was declining.

I look forward to your comments, and in the meantime will be liaising with other shareholders to compile a further list of questions.

Kind regards

My original post on this thread has moved a long way down due to several posts on the thread not related to this, so I am re-posting it here for info. I am now putting together a list of questions, please add to it!. I did notice in the first report of the monitor that the deadlines can be extended. At the moment approval of the SISP is March 19th....tomorrow, not today....LOIs to be in by April 17th , bids in by May 2nd and auction on May 8th. If there is a lot of interest, maybe the dates will be extended. Although we will not get announcements by RNA we will still pick up the monitor's reports. Here is my post from yesterday evening:

I have just received, Sunday evening, a reply from the monitor. This is in reply to the first, longer, email I sent yesterday, which included a reprint of the letter sent by Stas, plus a lot of my own text:

'The Monitor confirms receipt of your email. On March 19, 2024, the COPL Group will be seeking approval of a stalking horse sale and investment process (the “SISP”) which will provide for a broad canvassing of the market, including offering access to robust data room concerning the asset base. The Monitor is of the view that the SISP will determine the value of the COPL Group.

We also read your allegations below which we will be discussing with the company and may report on in a future report to court.

We are available to answer any other questions.

Thank you,'

'Does that sound like an invitation to put together a list?'

Stas, yes, we need to get a list together for a reply tomorrow. I am happy to keep this going!

Shouston, my allegations went further, referring to the Kravitz affidavit being incomplete and incorrect, the debts being misdeclared, the WOGCC figures not matching the claimed NGL injection, the missing billion barrel discovery, the carbon capture value, the short timeframe for bidders, the legal responsibilty of Kravitz to act in the shareholders' interests, etc. etc. And the shorting figures that I had put on here, plus Stas's letter in full.

So the Monitor says the court application is on the 19th. Also it is the first mention of the data room being open, and also that my allegations may be reported to the court. Maybe they are now rattled? If we can get as many paties interested as possible, the data room might be quite busy. Let's hope all the data is available!

I have just received, Sunday evening, a reply from the monitor. This is in reply to the first, longer, email I sent yesterday, which included a reprint of the letter sent by Stas, plus a lot of my own text:

'The Monitor confirms receipt of your email. On March 19, 2024, the COPL Group will be seeking approval of a stalking horse sale and investment process (the “SISP”) which will provide for a broad canvassing of the market, including offering access to robust data room concerning the asset base. The Monitor is of the view that the SISP will determine the value of the COPL Group.

We also read your allegations below which we will be discussing with the company and may report on in a future report to court.

We are available to answer any other questions.

Thank you,'

If your intentions are genuine, then welcome!

You may have read posts by 'Wybased', who has now been removed.

Vladyslav, if you have been watching this forum over the last year or two you will know that we have had many new members and 'sleepers' who have started posting with less than good intentions, mostly to steer the conversation in one direction or to simply disrupt. I hope that you are not one of these but it does seem strange that you have suddenly posted, seemingly with a lot of knowledge, many here will be wary, of that I am certain. Most of the problems have been eradicated by the in depth investigations recently carried out in to posters on these boards, and almost all have now stopped posting for fear of the legal repurcussions! Anyway, I was just saying what others will be thinking, and I guess if you have not been watching you will have missed all the issues.

Stas......'Morning Alfresco, fyi, I have sent both the original Kravitz letter and the final completed oil company marketing letter to the CAG for their reference and use as appropriate. The list of oil companies I have amassed have been from sharescope plus (plus does not have Canadian companies, anyone with sharescope pro can use the data mining facility to construct the Canadian company list).

I have not heard from the CAG for a couple of days thus I expect they are super busy. I will provide the list of companies to them as an excel. Hopefully they can share either through X or facebook or, our website when up and running. Failing that I'll post as best I can here.'

I am sure that we need to get on with everything we can. I would be happy to talk on email, if you want?

Vladyslav, usually this group will disregard posts from a brand new member. Even though you have been a member for several years your first post ever was yesterday. I am aware that your posts are in our direction, maybe you can enlighten us as to where you are coming from?

'The company is withholding critical information from its shareholders, such as release of December 2022 Ryder Scott report; information regarding the reason behind the suspension of JV negotiations and evaluation report recently conducted by a third party. The Affidavit states that it is not being released for competition reasons. '

There now needs to be competition for us, but the sharks that want our assets on the cheap don't want it.

Shaa.......'As soon as it’s live someone will post link on here.'

Do you have an idea of when, please?

Good morning Stas, you are working very hard on this, thank you. Are you intending to publish the final letter and the email addresses so we can all send it too?

It's good to see some of them are working on a Saturday, 8 read receipts out of 18 emails this morning so far, including Kravitz.

Ok, shaa, we just don't want to miss this window to act. It is just that on 20th January I had an email from CAG saying:

'Good Morning

My apologies, but unbeknown to me a member of our team had already secured a domain name to work with - sorry, but there’s so much happening at once that I’d missed that.

Really do appreciate your offer though.

Regards'

That's almost 2 months ago.........now is a crucial time, in my opinion, to get anyone and everyone on board!

Noted, Stas

Lloydy, I have the domain name, when you are ready we can be in contact. BUT....Shaa implied at 08.52 that the CAG are now doing this, can we clarify this before you spend time on it? Shaa, is this definite? Do they need the domain that I purchased a few weeks ago, coplshareholders.com? It is with GoDaddy.

Stas.....busy this morning but please can you include mention of the carbon capture potential which may be worth more than the oil? I will look again later, then send to my 18 recipients. 10 now confirmed receipt of yesterday's email and 3 so far for this morning's one. I will also send your earlier one when I have time.

Did you get a reply from the CAG about the website? I haven't yet. I think that a simple website will all the info in one place would be a good weapon, the link could be sent to everyone involved, including the press. As you know, I bought the domain name a while ago. I am sure Stas could fill it up very quickly!