Member Info for alfresco

Thanks to those that have sent me the report, the figures are enormous but a lot of it is over my head! We need to know if this is genuine, and then how to use it to our advantage. If it is genuine it could be sent to all the companies on Stas's list? I guess this has come from a whistleblower, maybe. It would be quite a task to create a fake report, I would think.

Thanks, Lloydy.

Lloydy, please can you send to me? I was out and missed the excitement! xb9ogxv56@mozmail.com

'Forming had the recent tr1’s been released on time I would have run a mile last year, but someone withheld that legal obligation to publish and hence I had less information to make a decision than insiders so that is legally not correct.'

Me too, but now I am locked in with no way out and on the verge of a crisis just becuase I invested everything on the basis of official announcements .

I guess that we need a bid of more than $100m to receive anything back for our shares? Or is it a bit less than that? SL plus BP plus new emergency loan plus costs etc. plus creditors and plus bonds. So after that, every $45m gives 1p per share. So say $200m would give us just over 2p a share.

5 could put up maybe 100m each?

Of course, a consortium of some of those companies could bid, share the risk and the funding.

Wow, Stas, you have been very busy, well done!

Https://www.justgiving.com/page/ryan-gaffney-1692272600856

The Dr Karma post is to the point!

I think Summit have a buyer lined up at a massive profit so they would up their bid. Summit don't want the assets, they want to get rich.

Saintnick....p56 does not refer to COPL, it is a different case used to support the application. Same for P45

2nd affidavit P7 section 8:

'I have also responded to inbound shareholder emails received since the issuance of the initial order, including several emails from retail investors regarding allegations of prior short selling by a party that is not the lender, DIP lender nor the Stalking Horse Bidder.'

Simply not true, I have has several read receipts but never had a reply from anyone apart from the monitor.

Https://www.ksvadvisory.com/docs/default-source/insolvency-case-documents/canadian-overseas-petroleum/ccaa-proceedings/motion-materials/copl---affidavit-of-peter-kravitz-affirmed-march-14-2024.pdf?sfvrsn=5d7e6765_7

There is mention of a second Kravitz affidavit dated 14th March.

Https://www.ksvadvisory.com/docs/default-source/insolvency-case-documents/canadian-overseas-petroleum/ccaa-proceedings/motion-materials/copl---bench-brief-of-the-applicants-(comeback-hearing).pdf?sfvrsn=5bf1b557_3

Https://www.ksvadvisory.com/docs/default-source/insolvency-case-documents/canadian-overseas-petroleum/ccaa-proceedings/court-orders/stay-extension-order-dated-march-18-2024.pdf?sfvrsn=a8226556_1

Today should be interesting with the judge now having information that shows that the Kravitz affidavit was not accurate!

Sharebel, I used that email list for my emails at the weekend, 18 of them.

Yes, no contact page or details.

Millholland has blocked my emails