Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
I'm reading considerable economic illiteracy from you new bashers. Don't make yourselves look even more foolish ehh.
All about future sales, as ever.
Funding for such a large order wouldn't be an issue IMHO, probably Gov. export credit guarantees involved. Funding for ticking over at close to break even is what the market is for. Some of the recent trades could be related.
We all have to respect that nothing can be disclosed to an individual that hasn't been notified to everyone. The desire for certainty over funding has hung over us for the whole of this year to date. I agree with you that the lack of news has to mean that funding is not under threat. It's as tough a time for us as I can remember, alleviated by the information on the By Health studies and submissions. China isn't in the best of economic times right now, but By Health seem able to keep growing.
Hopefully this is the last week that anonymous bloggers, and their lickers, will try to profit from lack of information. The stated intention to improve investor communications, and dispel the foul allegations will, hopefully, disinfect these chat boards in future.
I'd have thought it demonstrates a thought process, where answers in one trial lead to a further trial, developing the health benefit claims. If the first ones weren't successful then the more recent ones would never have been launched IMHO
What is it that we are sick of?
If there was price sensitive news to report, then, by law, we would have it.
Blaming the (non) messenger is futile IMHO
I guess there has been no boom in sales, and hope that there hasn't been a dip. Glad to see it back in stock on the other sales channels, glad to see a trcickle of other products maunching, especially as they are getting their supplies direct from {Provexis. Funding is a continued worry, and, I believe, a major driver of the revnt poor performance. When By Health will open up a major selling campaign id their choice, really very little that IF can do about that. He keeps getting the blame for being a bad salesman, when he has never been a salesman at all.
Just blowing off steam, it is frustrating seeing the sp suffer.....
Yes of course, companies that have a global image of being top experts, can not be relied on to produce accurate data.
And your response, as it always is, is to attack the poster, because you can't attack plain facts.
I haven't read any post doing any exhorting. If you are claiming that Schlummy's are telling untruths, you'd better watch your back IMO. Those that have posted using data prepared by them and Baker Hughs are not in any way telling others what to do. Whereas rhetoric like "death spiral" ought to be actionable by instant banning unless absolute proof can be provided. the FACT that recent fundraising was massively oversubscribed makes such claims look the lies that they are, Shorters talking their book should have some level of legal responsibility in my view.
Another fact. You, and the other liars, ONLY appear when shorting activity is being executed.
You pick fights with those who post verifiable positive issues, and accuse them of making it up. Your statements, often claiming the precise opposite of what has been assessed by world standard industry experts, would only be acceptable (IMHO) if they were back up by oil industry information, but they are not. Instead, you constantly promote an anonymous source, which many believe to be your alter ego.
Pantheon need o get physical progress happening again, and develop further their world class discovery. Then, and only then, will you liars run for cover.
The divi was so high, reflecting the political situation. We all knew that, why do these "mood depresser" types keep on appearing constantly talking things down? Nothing to do with shorters of course.....cough.