RE: Prem14 Jan 2026 00:32
Acker,
Are you actually for real?
You spent months hammering Graham Hill, post after post, calling him unemployable and questioning his credibility. At the time, you never disclosed that you had already sold out of PREM at a significant loss. Instead, you let people believe you were still invested, only admitting a few days back that you had exited and moved on to trading other shares
Despite that, you stayed on this board day after day, flooding it with negativity aimed squarely at Graham Hill
And now you say the board is “turning nasty and personal”
That is genuinely laughable
Do you seriously think the way you spoke about Graham Hill was not personal? Publicly attacking a man’s competence and reputation, while not being upfront about your own position, is about as personal as it gets
So don’t try to claim the moral high ground now. If you’re withdrawing, fine, but let’s not pretend this is about civility. It looks far more like avoiding accountability for months of behaviour that helped drag sentiment down while you had nothing to lose
And just to be clear, I am 100% behind PREM. I am heavily invested, having made a killing before and fully intending to make another one. What I am not behind is two faced posters on here who talk ethics after months of doing the exact opposite
The difference between you and me is this. When I exited PREM at 1p, I walked away from the board completely. I did not sit here day after day churning out hundreds of posts, talking the company down, undermining management, and trying to drive the share price lower for my own benefit. I came back only when I reinvested. That’s the line between honest participation and blatant self-interest