Member Info for Alaric

Holy Leons! time to get back to the Batcave for a glass of some proper Batpinot (eg.Chambolle Musigny). ps. actually this is down to the 'Nigerian Sid' effect - no sooner does he appear and off we go again...

indeed roger all that Tim B. think scene 2 is about to start. they just need to clear the bodies off the stage at the end of scene 1.

indeed bluerill, as well as the faux afro - spreche - 'mr. bluerill' 'mr. alaric' etc ( arguably, as I think you previously suggested, racist) and appalling syntax, we have the classic squirrel negative innuendo, dressed up as just harmlessly telling us about how the SP has performed in the past...so what's new here ffs? you know Afamefuna, you're going to need to do a lot better than this to survive on this board.

but you see Afamefuna, that's not true is it? You didn't ask why the SP ' HAD only ever GONE down', you asked 'why DOES the SP only ever GO down'. you might think that's just a bit grammatical semantics but it isn't, is it? the alternative meaning, which you clearly intended by using the present tense, strongly implied that the SP would continue to go down. So you just got it badly wrong again, as you did with Sun Trust. Why would anyone listen to you now - you've been on this board barely 2 months and got 2 fundamental things about this share badly wrong. tut tut.

...Afamefuna. your maiden post on 14th December - 'mr bluerill this looks like fantastic information but why does the share price only ever go down. explain that to me please.'

SP on 14th December - 23p
SP on Friday 25 Jan - 29p

so you were only 26% wrong in just over a month - care to explain that?

thanks bluerill for the most elucidating exposition of the recent market in our shares. i found the passage on 'san leon 2.0' fascinating and it is of course the point that our furry friends continue to miss (or at least chose to ignore). i repeat it here since for me it is absolutely key to understanding why the past for san leon is just that now. 'it is absolutely not uncommon for a company, even one as small as SLE, to have a '2.0' as it were. In fact, it's pretty much as common as dirt. Happens all the time, up and and down the market cap scale, and side to side across various sectors. In the end, if the story is sound, the capital is still there as it clearly was when Oisin brought the Mart Resources/OML18 deal to Martin Hughes at Toscafund'

Yeah bye frus. You know I honestly think, after lord knows how many posts, you're finally doing the right thing.

'OK, shall we move on from the petty insults and school yard banter'. trust me PC01, there is a little bit of method in this madness. am not sure you were with us during the 'hyena' days referred to by mclean91 below: it was nigh impossible then to get a considered discussion on any topic, as the trolling was endemic. much cleaned up now as you see. re the SBB i think your maths is about right so it's an incredibly tight market and no way I'm selling (i know a handful of other quite serious holders here and they're not selling under £1). am ashamed to say i don't have a totally clear understanding of SBB rules for AIM companies, whether under takeover code or Cos Acts. i know you touched on this the other day.

oh yes bluerill and a quick glance back through the archives shows that junkie and BS got on just fine and agreed on most if not all things over time. most recently of course on what they termed the Sun Trust debacle. must be very disheartening for them that this episode, as we always predicted, was a fantasy from beginning to end and would be resolved on such satisfactory terms for us. be very happy to hear the guys' views on how they called that so wrong?

indeed TimB, gets confusing what with Black Sid now as well as Mary Pop-Ups. maybe they all met down at gender reassignment therapy but as the board's resident expert in this area i will of course defer to your view. (i am quite drawn to bluerill's obsession with good syntax but as a single test for troll dna, perhaps it is ultimately too narrow?)

Bill - was checking and you just beat me to it : it was indeed Thursday's. as you see any objector would have to file at the court before the final return date with affidavit in support. it is quite clear that San Leon is not expecting any turbulence particularly now they have the letter from Sun Trust.

you really don't get it, do you BS? you blather on getting no support here and none of us has any inkling really what you're blathering about, except we get that you're p'd off with bluerill, who always betters you and gets loads of support. you don't get that he posts clever intuitive well researched fact-based stuff that we really like on this board. and that's the difference. it really isn't personal. oh and as you see he doesn't tolerate trolls, squirrels and pop-ups, most of whom you seem to rush to befriend and defend on their first outing. btw. you have some letters after your name, i think you said once?

yeah, thought you might...

Blues 10 - Blacks 0
mmmh I don't recall anyone ever getting into double digits on the vote up button here but looks like your team may need to brush up a bit BS. well done to bluerill though, our very own 'Special One' ha?

indeed so mclean91, just as simple as that. and yep, bluerill, I know exactly what you mean: the 'but' word has more threat in it than people might think. as I know you know, i was being sarcastic about FT readership demographics and I do know i have to watch that; there is just something about certain posters on this board that acts as a trigger on my childish addiction to sarcasm. heh ho.

absolutely correct bluerill and looks as if the Dublin court appearance went off entirely as expected without any hitches. and all as advertised in the FT last week, as you say. i imagine they will want to see the SP back at say 50p, before introducing a progressive dividend policy and that is an entirely reasonable set of assumptions, given our circumstances and prospects now. ps.somewhat aspirational of you to imagine that squirrel types might actually read the FT!

think admin has gotten pretty wise on most of the non-holding trolls. some as you have seen have been banned. btw you mustn't ever give your personal details to them

you will be relieved to see, PC01, that our SP is rising by virtue of that most conservative of drivers - solid buying. with the SBB now on the immediate horizon along with the newsflow i refer to below, it is difficult to see what will stop this trend now.

he certainly has bluerill and well done again. and am sure he will be joined by many more and soon now given the prospective newsflow from here. to remind, we have about £50m in the bank and by mid Feb, we should have started the share buyback and be getting operational news updates at very least on the lateral well drill and on much else besides. for the first time in years we do not appear to have any black clouds on the horizon. the fact that's where we are now, just as our partner jite okoloko gets almost all arrears paid by NNPC and refinances himself, is incredibly potent. for the first time since before Shell left, we can properly start delivering field workovers and elimination of pipeline losses. remember production on OML18 is projected to more than double to over 100,000 bopd and that's without new discoveries.

you flatter yerself all you like bs. the thought of scurrying squirrel activity as some kind of reliable indicator of San Leon newsflow improving is just hilarious after all this time of their garbage trolling on this stock! (but they do also serve the purpose of providing something easy to chew on in the gaps between news). well done to bluerill on finding buyers: we should all make that a new year's resolution.