Member Info for Alaric

i can only assume you slept through the webinar, GS. shame as it and the prior rns disclosed a significant amount of new information ( none of it thus inside from then). so yes in short you are missing quite a lot. if i might be so bold, you'd be well advised to get up to speed on all this before further opining on the distinction between facts and illusions concerning the results of Talitha#A

quite right Scot and, as you have seen today, there is a majority here who look forward to reading your fact-led discussion. ( it always amazes me on these boards how sensitive some are to the realities of vigorous intellectual debate, particularly when one side of the 'discussion ' chooses to dissemble).

you mean i'm not already filtered by you csw? must be losing my touch...anyway just for my record, as you wanted to know if others support Scot's position, that is affirmative. and i think not just for myself but for a significant number of panr shareholders on these boards who have come to respect the huge factual contribution Scot has made and continues to make. so what's your excuse for being here? it's a miserable lonely world in factless filtered purgatory but, you know, i kinda think you'll fit in well there.

so Jimbeaux and csw12 have both turned out to defend the honour of their champion - Brombard. csw goes so far to suggest that, as 'a gentleman', Brombard would not sully himself by addressing the factual points made in Scot's posts. as neither of them appear to want to take a stab at it either, the counter to Scot is thus literally pointless. no change there then.

readers here should be aware that JofHoggit is (at best) an 88E poster with an agenda. Scot126 has posted a complete debunking of his conspiracy theories on the 88E board, which he seems to take personally. whilst 88E have been (properly) quick to point out how PANR's recent data from Talitha#A will benefit them, comments on the (correct) conclusion that the vast majority of any shared assets sit on PANR's side of the fence don't play well to some on the 88E board.

indeed Scot facts are powerful things. given the facts here are so supportive of PANR's business case, you have to question the motivation of those among us who appear so deeply threatened by them? fwiw i also tend to find those who argue ad hominem do so because they are incapable of sustaining a discussion on the merits of a given factual construct . sadly these boards seem to attract many such types.

Pander, that sounds very much like a question for telemachus2021 on the Reddit thread?

with Brent at $65 today and San Leon in OML18 at $27, you might possibly think Oisin got a good deal?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil-research-goldman-idUSKBN2BB0D5

interesting observation, bluerill. thanks. and with oil demand projections still going up, places like Nigeria stand to do very well. this is how oxford economics see next 20 years: 'But the absence of coordinated global action to stem the rise in carbon emissions means that oil demand will continue to rise in many emerging markets. ... As a result, we forecast the price of Brent crude in nominal terms will climb to around US$180pb in 2030, slightly below the projections of both the IEA and the EIA.'

i should just add there are other posters on Advfn who have been splendid in my experience, including in particular Darcon and Rabito but there are others as well. Darcon used to moderate it (excellently btw) but he has recently given up in frustration as he is unable to moderate the 'blue subscription posters, which is a great shame and a poor reflection on the way these boards are managed. hence the real plus of the Reddit forum here, where telemachus 2021 will i am sure continue to do a superb job in moderating it and in contributing immense factual and commentary value. i have seen one other stock, where corrosive troll posting on both LSE and Advfn, left unchecked, has virtually ruined any chance of sensible discussion. its motives are always highly dubious.

sadly Rodgetrades, the ADVFN board has increasingly been infested by trolls of late,who aren't interested in factually based discussion, although Scot 126 still posts there and he is always worth reading. telemachus1, who is unsurpassed for his breadth and depth of oil knowledge and provides considered and easily understood commentary, has now moved to the Reddit forum on Panr, which indeed he also now moderates. https://www.reddit.com/r/PantheonResourcesPANR
utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

this has now become the go to discussion for in depth fact based discussion on Panr with zero tolerance for troll posting

'That's some write, no wonder some people are trying hard to generate some selling.'
and nobody better to prove your point, redeye, than old ninepence himself ! no sign yet of that refutation though

nothing wrong with tax avoidance mcco. it is every taxpayer's right (i would also say duty) to organise his tax affairs in such a way to minimise liability. obviously hmrc don't like that but they lose as many cases as they win, so all's fair in life and law?

sadly indeed the SP had already been at 11.1 p for less than a day. by the time of the 9p 'predicshun' it was 12.5p and a week later back through 18p. then within a month it went through 27p. i think most on this board (at least those without any mental health issues) would agree that's not much of a prediction (the worst ever in the history of blogging boards?). but heh on the brightside it could have been worse - it was only 4 × out!! (as of today). and that's not even counting the 6p special dividend !!

i suppose sam, if you somehow and for whatver demented reason believed the SP was going to 9p, you would indulge in the strange behaviours you suggest? Btw do you think that was possibly the worst 'predicshun' ever on any blogging board anywhere in the universe? i know it's given us all a barrel of laughs over the last year

'was a strange, semi-official, fantasy' really Eadwig, is that right? and you still here and all? well i never, thought you said you were on yer bike at 40p, so what gives now ? you simply can't help yourself when it comes to mischief making. anyway nothing strangely fantastic or semi official (whatever that's supposed to mean?) about O's attempted share purchase last year from Tosca, he simply couldn't raise sufficient funds. a total non story now and very old hat. but you know that already. as for Tosca they've come down one percent. big deal ! probably some housekeeping so wide yawn as usual with you zzzz...

'Scot is the facts Rottweiler on this and other boards, present 'facts' at your peril' - never a truer word and thank goodness for that! Well said.

'This is exactly why I don't post much...' - lesson learnt maxwell? probably best stick to your mantra to avoid further hurt feelings. generally you will find if you read scot you will learn a lot though, so plenty of positives here.

yep interesting (or probably not, in fact mind numbingly boring) qf. i've been wondering for a while whether the moderation of this board should include some kind of mental health support for those among us who have clearly lost the plot? food for thought anyway as we contemplate the excellent short term news horizon in front San Leon...

ah stephen there you are . sad story i guess with you...to remind this is you from 5 months ago: 'This at 20.5p . I dout this will go much lower but would buy back in at 15p. Seeing this price drop makes my 27p sale last year look like a good choice'.
so difficult in hindsight to think of that as a good choice but recall you saying you needed the '£7k' for your house.