Member Info for AIMing_high

WSG isn't leaky

those two statement could well be true...but i don't they are connected. last time there was big buys it clearly wasn't insider trading as the shares tanked from 10% up to 25% down on the same day

yes...i can see why we're down vs pre RNS (the deal is now on hold and some people are anti Iran) but i do feel that anything 15-17 is just rude

suspect he's busy washing the blood off his hands after the Israeli Embassy move. .......scratch that, he's either too stupid to realise it's his fault or simple fails to give a f**k

doubt he'd have been able to sell......always had the market sensitive knowledge that the client was Iran, and now he'll be in a closed period running up to the results. but he's not a big trader in this anyway. if WSG goes titsup then i suspect there will be a fair bit of scrutiny on him anyway, he certainly wouldn't want to add insider trading to his list of things to defend.

a week on Friday for the update...but yes some pretty serious volume going through but not really any price movement...feels like it wants to break north but something is stopping it. but maybe that's just because to me it feels very undervalued currently. volume of 1.25m in the first 2.5 hours is pretty good

i bought some at 27p but they got auto sold this morning by IG when there was insufficient funds in teh account (i'm an idiot).. so i bought them into an ISA, so i still have the shares, they just now costs 11.29p and have a nice loss to match with them. i lost 184,105 this morning but have managed to buy back 149,000 - my average is now up to 23.5p (sad face emoji)

looks like you may well have called this right....dropping back a bit again

We haven't had this single day volume since the LoI day back in May 2016 (25th i believe) and there's still an hour to go....sadly there are more share in issue these days

there are plenty of reasons: it dropped because people wanted Oman and not Iran s the ME contract, it dropped because the Iran deal is now on hold, it could drop further if the deal got indefinitely postponed due to these sanctions. i think it will get sorted in relatively short order, but there are plenty of reasons for this to have dropped and maybe drop fruther

don't you be joking about this Tosh...it was bl00dy you telling us! you still haven't enlightened us as to how your source was so incredibly wrong......it's almost enough to make be drop one of your C-bombs!!!! ;-)

it categorically is Iran. they stated in plane English that it is Iran, that's not a slight of hand and clever plays on words......they stated it as a fact and that's the kind of thing they simply can't make up in an RNS.

the cat is out of the bag on the location....as soon as the results are out in 2 weeks i can't help but feel that it would be a good sign (and potentially a great time) to buy some shares......i doubt it will happen.

by similar logic when you sign the deal the price is set

or a glass half full view is that there are now fewer competitors for this business due to the sanctions and the Iranian government will want to do all the international trade that they can now that the US is off the table.

Twitter has a 100% record of getting the calls wrong on WSG

not enough cash in my account (my stupid fault) and all closed out - lost 144k shares.....bought 123k back in real accounts so hopefully not too stung. lost out a fair few hundred quid but as far as i see it this either goes to zero or over �1.....so i'm not too bothered about the actual loss, i'm more concerned about the loss of the potential gain if this comes off. seemed get all of them at 11.50 - i honestly think that this company is worth way more than that without the ME contract.......at least now all my holdings are real shares i can just ignore until the RNS bings (one way or the other)

i was thinking of taking my wide on a nice trip to Muscat with my ludicrous WSG gains (not that i was ever convinced it was Oman but no other options lent themselves to dreaming). now i guess it's Iran...which i actually really want to ski in...might leave the Mrs behind though...she'd love it there but tough.

i wonder who's providing security to Oman...sure as hell isn't us. can we now all agree not to use "100% certain" for things that are a: not 100% certain and 2: turn out to be 100% wrong. if we can eventually operate with Iran under these US sanctions then there could be some serious money to be made. i doubt it can be soon though. they'll have looked at all quick solutions before they suspended the deal.

"it should be noted that the Company considers that services and equipment anticipated to be supplied by Westminster fall outside any current sanctions..>" that to m reads as them not being from the US....otherwise they'd already be picked up by the sanctions.