RE: Bewise and other LTH!6 Oct 2020 16:49
I'm not really relaxed about the move to ADSs as the only trading mechanism. When we're off AIM there will be even less governance! This is from the September RNS, where it talks about what coming off AIM means to shareholders:
"The Company will also no longer be subject to the QCA Corporate Governance Code or be required to comply with the continuing obligations set out in the FCA’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (“DTRs”) or, provided the Company’s securities remain outside the scope of the regulation, the EU Market Abuse Regulation (“MAR”). In addition, the Company and its shareholders will no longer be subject to the provisions of the DTRs relating to the disclosure of changes in significant shareholdings in Verona Pharma."
At least they are up-front about it.
I must be asking for trouble, but I've decided to hang on to my VRP shares and let Halifax convert them to VRNA ADSs. My reasoning... I think the Phase 3 status and the 16 clinical trials performed to date reduce the risk of the formulation NOT being successful. Their business plan looks reasonable, and the market opportunity looks pretty big. Once they start marketing the product in 2023, a $1Bn market cap should be achievable. Nasdaq should give Verona a higher valuation.
I can believe that the anti-inflammatory and improved lung function characteristics of Ensifentrine will help Covid patients too.
In the past I’ve looked at Synairgen – it’s a very similar product and the company is comparable. VRP/VRNA has the same market cap as Synairgen but SNG001 is at Phase 2. Comparing the two offerings is interesting: SNG001 appears to improve lung function/volume more that Ensifentine (2.21L versus 400mL) but SNG001 is earlier stage and doesn't have the same anti-inflammatory properties as far as I can see. I think Verona is probably lower risk.