Member Info for Adw198

All of those trades were announced too. Not like you, who told us about all your rig mates loading up at 1.90p. Hilarious how badly you get everything here - can’t even get your story straight, even allowing for the fact it’s a complete work of fiction.

Calm down WOS.

1.05 was Plan A, I actually sold before then on account of the negative vibes from H2, but bought back after Gazelle and have now sold for a profit. Not all of us have to invest 7 years at massive averages. Maybe one of your many alter egos can explain how these things work.

You’ve been caught out here, that’s why you hate me so much.

I sold WOS for some quick and easy money. Whilst the medium term future is miles better, I’d rather not be stuck waiting for a binary outcome that feels like another coin toss. Was hoping for some more buying pressure to reassure. Might well come in like gazelle did, I can live with that.

Good luck to A Few Good Men invested here - Doc, Wigster, Manx, Furry, Unnd, probably a couple more.

Skint! :)

Great, I’m sure when I’m your age I’ll be retired and mortgage free too.

Hopefully unlike you though, I’ll have some loved ones around to enjoy it with and won’t lose my mind about what a stranger thinks about a Mongolian explorer.

Right, no more indulging you now. Company talk - Heron 2 looking less likely the longer it takes imo. I’m thinking of selling for a quick bit of profit.

“Gravy - I did my best to get him banned a month or two ago. I went to a lot of trouble in fact.”

This is hilarious! This mornings anger is all because I gave some views about the likelihood of PC paying us in November.

I hope I find something better to do with my retirement time than get so worked up about people having views on a share I don’t agree with. Although I also hope not to lose as much money as the lads have here.

I bet LSE were laughing their socks off at the misplaced self importance of these prats. I certainly am!

I’m quite well placed to umpire this little squabble between Investor and Gravy.

Investor does indeed do a better job of ignoring me than gravy, given circa 90% of gravy’s posts are literally just complaining about / to me.

Investor does at least mix it up with some stories about RR and his latest get rich quick trading idea.

That said, Investor is a massive hypocrite because he spends longer telling other people to ignore me whilst frequently bringing me up.

2 all round laughing stock posters clearly nursing huge (paper) losses here.

As I keep saying I’m a holder lads.

You can continue to mock me for not being an oilman or accountant if you like. I’m not a Mongolian expert either. Just like everyone else - bar Abzzba who claims to be an oilman and yet who has had the most spectacularly wrong precisions. H1 output!! :)

All the lads are out this morning piling on simply because I’ve asked why they all expect PC to amend, sign and then make good a contract.

Abzzbas own version of 2025 is that PC were playing games trying to starve us of capital. For reasons he’s can’t / won’t explain they’re suddenly going to rush things through to hand over nearly a million dollars. He might even be right, let’s wait and see - in the meantime time opinions on binary outcomes seem fair.

Unless you have a massive biased agenda of course :)

Wow, Tt1981 going even further and thinking it might be “this week” PC suddenly do a complete uturn on their behavior.

No wonder so many are so down and so angry here

Know Doc, all these people so confident in the behavior of PC. Cute!

I hope they’re right, although you’ll perhaps note not a single one of them can explain why they expect PC to negotiate / agree / amend the wording, sign it and then pay what it says to all happen in November.

Like with the raise let’s see who is right, who is wrong and how whoever is wrong reacts. Perhaps this time it’ll be me who so embarrassed I need to start a new alias (WOS)and or disappear on holiday (Proquo)

Hi Barmy,

I thought Id explained earlier but it’s a fair and polite query.

I’ve used negotiate and I’ve also used amend. It definitely needs amending because that’s the word the company used. I think amended and renegotiated are largely interchangeable.

The contract might just need minor tweaks, I don’t know what PC need to be comfortable paying what they contractually agreed to.

There’s also the need to update it to include Gazelle - I’m not sure why that’s needed either as I wouldn’t have assumed it needed specifying which well.

Whether people prefer the word renegotiate or amend is up to them and not a biggie. The underlying point I was making is I don’t think it’ll be done quickly based on the evidence of their past performance.

Re the sales deal being amended, signed and paid by the end of November it’ll either happen, or it won’t - and one of us right and one wrong.

I’ve explained why I don’t expect it, you just told to us to expect it and refused to say why.

It’s like the raise - I told people why I expected one, you just told us it wouldnt happen.

You tell us you were an oil field worker so forgive for me thinking you have absolutely no idea what due diligence involves in a deal like this.

“Past the due diligence stage”.

Hmm, do you know what involved in due diligence in a deal like this? There’s lots of moving parts, especially when there are ongoing / new drills.

Asiamet announced a deal had been agreed for a JV for a mine build, but THEN NINE months were needed to complete due diligence.

What about you gravy / Margs - do you also expect PC to amend a contract, sign it and cough up within 6 weeks?! :)

“Fully expect the reworded sales agreement to be signed by end of November and the $800,000 PC have withheld to be paid along with monthly invoices paid in full.“

Maybe this will happen, but let’s recall the chronology. They took YEARS to agree a sales deal. They took 3 months to physically sign it. They then decided not to honour it on the basis they may have some tax obligations. They asked us to resolve this with the authorities. When that clarification was given rather than pay and apologise for the contractual breach they said the contract will need reworking. The idea they’ll rush this through within 6 weeks just so they hand over nearly a million dollars is pretty optimistic.

Perhaps you could explain what your expectations are based on lads?

@roadhouse

Im the original!

Someone who spent years ramping this with false claims called wiseowlspeaks then set up a(nother) new account to sound like me. And then went off to other boards to cause disruption specifically as revenge for me sharing my views here.

The likes of Gravy, Investor, Abzzba, Tenbag, Proquo, Margaritas (most of whom are are probably the same person) choose to ignore this context because adw189 continues to pump out ramping nonsense that they’d like newbies to swallow to bail out their losses.

All very childish and definitely petty.

Gravy and Margs, what a double act. :)

Hi Tt1981

Appreciate the reasonable tone, happy to reply in the same manner (as I did to you on Telegram). I’m not a shorter, I don’t know how to be honest.

I’ve been dipping in and out here and I’m currently invested precisely because of Gazelle. When the facts change we need to reassess - same reason I sold following Heron 2 results last year. My negativity aka honest analysis at that time proved well founded, as did my belief that a raise would be needed. Remember the abuse I received simply for holding those opinions?!

As I’ve said,l (having spent so long here) I believe I’ve got a better knowledge of this company than I do all bar a coupe of AIM companies, so hopefully I can use that to get some of the money I lost back, albeit Im playing for smaller stakes this time because believe or not I personally think a Mongolian explorer / maiden producer is still high risk.

Thanks Gravy.

Equally, I think you’ve found your level - stalking / abusing people who discuss the company prospects.